Only the broken would entertain the idea for more than a mere fleeting moment. Attraction, for human beings that aren't mentally ill in some way, is more complex that seeing a girl with healthy genes.
from link said:
Where do I even start with you lot, you get an idea of my post and start arguing against..when I said the exact same thing as you in my post.
Where do I start with you - you deliberately post something in controversial language that clearly conveys a specific meaning, then you backtrack.
In passing men can notice that young girls are attractive. But in the context you clearly posted - and backed up with a wikipedia article to boot - you were talking about sexual preference. Which is a whole different thing.
It's A)......its always A)
No I didn't. Go back and read it without cherry picking what you want to see. It's very clear.
I watched it all, mostly through disbelief. They went so low as to use a child as a prop towards the end. I remember watching a proper debate between these 2 last year (maybe the year before) and Nye pretty much destroyed Hamm but to be honest he didn't do especially well here. That being said, he was probably internally shaking his head at what he was hearing for most of it.
Sorry @Yoni, @sayward, @russell (when she's about):
This. Exactly this when I** encounter a woman or group of women on wide paths / canal towpaths / actual cycle lanes whilst on my bike.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DT7d_LshnY
**and much to her annoyance (because I rib her about it) when my girlfriend encounters them too)
And in my defence - I promise I do look ahead better than he did...
Disagree.
