- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 36,753
Before I answer that (and I will) why not take a shot at any of the questions I've posed?Scenario - ahead of the race she says to Jockey 'if you win this it would be funny if I give you a massive kiss on the lips, you agree?'... replies 'it would be, yes, but let me win the race first!'..... just sayin'
How do we know that didn't happen???
1) How is it materially different? It's a kiss in the flush of a victory at a sporting event. Only the sex of the kisser and kissee differs.
2) Should the action itself be prohibited - given that the only way that it can be policed is either it's allowable human interaction, or it's always wrong and always sexual assault. It can't be policed any other way because if you try to police it on whether the receiver of the kiss is offended then you de-facto ban it anyway because nobody could take the risk.
3) Lots of women think this:
Just like in the good old witch-hunt days,what we are once again witnessing here is puritanism in the name of a so-called greater good, claiming to promote the liberation and protection of women, only to enslave them to a status of eternal victim and reduce them to defenseless preys of male chauvinist demons
So should we paint women as eternal victims and defenseless prey of mail chavinists, or do they have their own agency?
To answer your question: he said he was surprised. If your frankly crazy and bizarre whataboutery situation was true, then he wouldn't have been surprised would he.