![]()
Co-op is using facial recognition tech to scan and track shoppers
Branches of the Southern Co-op are using facial recognition to look for potential shoplifters. The roll-out raises concerns about the creep of surveillance tech in the private sectorwww.wired.co.uk
big co-op watching you.
@Scouse
The private realm is unregulated - which is shit really. People justify it by saying "companies can do what they like - you don't have to buy from them" - but if they all do it...![]()
Co-op is using facial recognition tech to scan and track shoppers
Branches of the Southern Co-op are using facial recognition to look for potential shoplifters. The roll-out raises concerns about the creep of surveillance tech in the private sectorwww.wired.co.uk
big co-op watching you.
@Scouse
No we are not the most. china holds that record and the government uses facial recognition as a matter of course and population control.The private realm is unregulated - which is shit really. People justify it by saying "companies can do what they like - you don't have to buy from them" - but if they all do it...
...we're the most surveilled population on the planet. We have zero real freedom. We're a race of slaves.
I'll give you that - but in terms of the most surveilled cities london does hit third on the list.No we are not the most. china holds that record and the government uses facial recognition as a matter of course and population control.
I'd rather not live in a society based upon "not as bad as" thanksNo we are not the most. china holds that record and the government uses facial recognition as a matter of course and population control.
I think the moral outrage and public shaming of companies absolutely started the process.Well of course they are going to take it seriously, facing an army of lawyers, moral outrage and public shaming guaranteed.
Im surprised its not 90% of meetings.
Because generally squeaking is indicative of a grease defecit.The squeaky wheel gets the grease.
We are doing - hence the push for diversity and inclusion. Because it improves things for everyone.You may argue that ridiculous endgames is not an argument against movement now.
But I really think we should pay more attention to what we want from this.
Just to confirm in case anyone ever wondered: diversity and inclusion agendas are NOT lipservice only in global organisations.
Sat on a planning meeting to spend $2.7bn next year and D&I has taken up 20% of the hour...
It's being brought in in our place as well. I remain to be convinced what it adds over the existing legislation and company policy, and our company is already pretty diverse - but it keeps HR people busy I guess.
Not diverse then.everyone is any position of power is a middle aged white bloke, except one middle aged women on the board.
How diverse are the decision makers? I've always thought my place was quite diverse, cos on the ground it is, but basically everyone is any position of power is a middle aged white bloke, except one middle aged women on the board.
I was commenting in the abstract, inequality and difference is one of the cornerstones of life, its what drives us and makes life interesting enough to see it through.Because generally squeaking is indicative of a grease defecit.
We are doing - hence the push for diversity and inclusion. Because it improves things for everyone.
White people included. Poor people most of all.
I was commenting in the abstract, inequality and difference is one of the cornerstones of life, its what drives us and makes life interesting enough to see it through.
Im sure our brains could evolve to gain stimulus from absolute stagnating sameness, but given that we are on a mission to achieve it, where do you think it should stop?
At the point where its impossible not to be in any state of difference, or someway back where the amount allowed is dictated by cultural fashion, controlled by big tech
Im not talking about an even playing field, the end game of adjusting all players abilities so they can all win.
Enforced fairness which probably breaks some unkown law of the universe , we are all here because someone or something lost and on a continual basis our bodies devour life of every level to survive.
This all might sound a bit batshit, but everything Ive mentioned has begun its inplimentation because logic demands it.
We decided slavery was unjust..well the west did.
Then we decided gender discrimination, homosexuality was unjust.
Now we are turning on meat eating and our effect on nature itself.
Next will be geographical disadvantage, then cognitive ability.
And the upcoming biggie, can we use robots as slaves?
I'm just saying, its a can of worms.
We do spend a lot of time taking the piss out of our French colleagues, but I'm pretty sure that's expected.
Not diverse then.
Starts from the top down.
Until you have sufficiently qualified and experienced people to fill the roles you can't have a diverse c-suite. You literally can't start at the top unless you're going to employ unqualified people. The only exception in the UK is women, and that deficit is being addressed pretty well.
I agree - but these people aren't that hard to find.Until you have sufficiently qualified and experienced people to fill the roles you can't have a diverse c-suite. You literally can't start at the top unless you're going to employ unqualified people. The only exception in the UK is women, and that deficit is being addressed pretty well.
Can of worms is a bad thing.I'm just saying, its a can of worms.
His Da was a coal miner, that's where he gets the skintone fromTom Jones and Beverly Knight are presenting a gospel music night over Christmas, which is splendid.
It would seem someone at the beeb thought he was a bit too white for the article about it .
View attachment 43292
Tom Jones and Beverly Knight are presenting a gospel music night over Christmas, which is splendid.
It would seem someone at the beeb thought he was a bit too white for the article about it .
View attachment 43292