He does have a point, though. Never post an URL to a cheat thingie, don't even post the name of it. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.Marc said:You rank twat number 1 full stop.
He does have a point, though. Never post an URL to a cheat thingie, don't even post the name of it. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.Marc said:You rank twat number 1 full stop.
old.Whoodoo said:Fail to see your basis for comarison, only against yourself. There is help out there for you tho http://www.lifeteen.org/TeenTalk.asp?Action=ViewBoard&ID=20412 you really should read this, im sure you can relate to it.
Belomar said:There was a reason the mods edited out the name and link of the cheat program in the original message.
Skilgannon said:Oh, come on Belo.
I know that alot of users are not too conversant with search engines but it doesn't take 10 secs to find the proggy if you wanted to.
The main thing now is that it doesn't work. It is history. If the VN board was correct the new proggy is same developers but diff name and diff company.
Nope. Bad news for them is that it's open source and completely free to download and use.Skilgannon said:The problem for the twats who used this is that 1.68 screwed it by changing the encryption algorithms.
Bad news for the idiots who buy from Ebay is that they are buying a ripped off version that doesn't work anymore. Poetic justice
I believe it took just a month for the dev to code a workaround for the new encryption and there's been a pre-release version of the util available with this since Apr/May.Skilgannon said:Bad news for the DaoC community is that the developers are hard at work on the version that will run with current encryption
Actually, the devs did 2 things:Skilgannon said:The main thing now is that it doesn't work. It is history. If the VN board was correct the new proggy is same developers but diff name and diff company.
Skilgannon said:I guess have spent too long in the company of adults.
It is no good trying to hide from problems like this:
MorganLeFay: (230) Albion: 16% Midgard: 30% Hibernia: 53%
Merlin: (387) Albion: 21% Midgard: 41% Hibernia: 37%
Galahad: (176) Albion: 21% Midgard: 41% Hibernia: 36%
Bors: (141) Albion: 49% Midgard: 28% Hibernia: 21%
Pellinor: ( 98) Albion: 43% Midgard: 32% Hibernia: 23%
Palomides: (108) Albion: 18% Midgard: 59% Hibernia: 22%
Pendragon: (108) Albion: 63% Midgard: 23% Hibernia: 12%
Bedevere: ( 85) Albion: 60% Midgard: 24% Hibernia: 15%
Percival: (147) Albion: 34% Midgard: 38% Hibernia: 27%
Kay: (102) Albion: 43% Midgard: 35% Hibernia: 21%
Gawaine: ( 87) Albion: 32% Midgard: 29% Hibernia: 37%
Guinevere: (222) Albion: 33% Midgard: 21% Hibernia: 45%
Nimue: (124) Albion: 75% Midgard: 10% Hibernia: 13%
Mordred: (636) Albion: 35% Midgard: 27% Hibernia: 37%
Iseult: ( 88) Albion: 25% Midgard: 35% Hibernia: 39%
Lancelot: (247) Albion: 30% Midgard: 23% Hibernia: 45%
Igraine: ( 54) Albion: 37% Midgard: 29% Hibernia: 33%
Tristan: ( 98) Albion: 30% Midgard: 27% Hibernia: 41%
Gaheris: ( 49) Albion: 30% Midgard: 30% Hibernia: 38%
Nothing to indicate euro servers are any differant.
It is time this issue was made more public and more action was done and, importantly, seen to be done.
Sabu said:That percentages are totally a lie, wonder why people takes it like serious, seems like u would like all that cheats on servers.
After 10 days of me posting that, and the fact someone else said exactly the same thing, not only are you not funny, but ill put money you typed "masturbation" into the FH search engine to see if you could get any tips, and found this thread.dual said:Quite funny how you find a thread like that, guess u use it all the time huh?
old.Whoodoo said:Meanwhile, the rest of us got back onto the topic at hand, and you can go back to the topic in yours.