Belgerath said:Thats true enough but lets be honest all 3 realms zerg but albs do it alot more than others

Belgerath said:Its more or less a population problem 2bh albs have more then mids who have more then hibs thus due to this albion have a much higher chance of well out numbering any enemys and thusly from mids and hibs perspective they r Zerging, its the same on nearly every server inc american servers excal isnt as bad as pry though on pry mids and albs have simular numbers but i play hib there an we r on average out numbered 3-1 per realm.
A trend i have found in BG1 is who ever has the CK seems to be the realm zerging at that point, and 2bh its the only time u ever see any hibs out in numbers in bg1 is when they have the keep. I played Alb Excal for a very long time so i know what im talking about and only recently moved to mid excal and believe me emain/bg1 is the same albs outnumber every1 so if they want 2 or not they zerg.
Read reply if u want but thats just my 2 cents![]()
Hardly 100% true now at lvl 508 Hibs > 8 Mids > 8 Albs.
Belgerath said:Its more or less a population problem 2bh albs have more then mids who have more then hibs thus due to this albion have a much higher chance of well out numbering any enemys and thusly from mids and hibs perspective they r ZergingI know it appears that way but on saturday I did a test with a mate - there were 34 albs online at that point and 31 mids - seem balanced? But of those albs there were 4 buffbots by APK and for the mids 6 buffbots - then when you break it down further there were way more mid stealthers online than albs - so what you had were a lot of mids out to own with their stealthers whereas the albs were playing more 'visible' classes - thus even with about the same numbers the mids felt outnumbered and were complaining about the alb zerg...
Youre test is flawed, 1fg of those mids were gank grps for the sake of argument -8 from the 31 straight off (in reality there were 2 gank grps BC and Celerity) since thye wont run with "the zerg", this ofc was morning/lunch time when i aw numbers close to that leaving 23 mids, say 10 are stealthers, 13 mids. Generally this is 1fg + 5 adds.I know it appears that way but on saturday I did a test with a mate - there were 34 albs online at that point and 31 mids - seem balanced? But of those albs there were 4 buffbots by APK and for the mids 6 buffbots - then when you break it down further there were way more mid stealthers online than albs - so what you had were a lot of mids out to own with their stealthers whereas the albs were playing more 'visible' classes - thus even with about the same numbers the mids felt outnumbered and were complaining about the alb zerg...
Chronictank said:Youre test is flawed, 1fg of those mids were gank grps for the sake of argument -8 from the 31 straight off (in reality there were 2 gank grps BC and Celerity) since thye wont run with "the zerg", this ofc was morning/lunch time when i aw numbers close to that leaving 23 mids, say 10 are stealthers, 13 mids. Generally this is 1fg + 5 adds.
In comparison Say 10 albs again for arguments sake are stealthers 24 albs left, in the morning there were no alb grps seperated from the zerg 2 hrs gaming and the only fg's were hibs which i saw and later on a caster debuff grp.
24 albs vs 12 mids amg/mmg.
Albs tend to be all in one place where as mids tend to spread, call it what u will but thats how it is. Albs have a cg mid do not, (leet attitude of gank grps i guess).
This is the general picture day in day out in emain
Chronictank said:Youre test is flawed, 1fg of those mids were gank grps for the sake of argument -8 from the 31 straight off (in reality there were 2 gank grps BC and Celerity) since thye wont run with "the zerg", this ofc was morning/lunch time when i aw numbers close to that leaving 23 mids, say 10 are stealthers, 13 mids. Generally this is 1fg + 5 adds.
In comparison Say 10 albs again for arguments sake are stealthers 24 albs left, in the morning there were no alb grps seperated from the zerg 2 hrs gaming and the only fg's were hibs which i saw and later on a caster debuff grp.
24 albs vs 12 mids amg/mmg.
Albs tend to be all in one place where as mids tend to spread, call it what u will but thats how it is. Albs have a cg mid do not, (leet attitude of gank grps i guess).
This is the general picture day in day out in emain

Spot the irony!!!!!Belgerath said:we soloed the keep on monday
:worthy: :worthy: :worthy:Guinever said:This is a game you play it for (FUN), if albs wanna zerg let them if it's their idea of fun, personally I dun care if I am not having fun anymore than I just turn the game off, its as simple as that.....Hibs zerg, mids zerg, albs zerg I dun care, stop whining and enjoy the game imo![]()
Guinever said:This is a game you play it for (FUN), if albs wanna zerg let them if it's their idea of fun, personally I dun care if I am not having fun anymore than I just turn the game off, its as simple as that.....Hibs zerg, mids zerg, albs zerg I dun care, stop whining and enjoy the game imo![]()
Coldbeard said:lets all be friends!![]()
or not![]()
Awarkle said:naw wasnt rez bot we needed 8 rps for our healer and all of us had just hit our 350 cap so couldnt return that was the bonedancer zerg you saw earlier was us getting the last 8 rps
and yeps taking to 50 but will be a 2 week break as some members are on hols so we will be leveling up buffbots and earning some money on a bd team two of us decided to make.
Coldbeard said:forest heart hits you for 180 damage!
forest heart hits you for 180 damage!
forest heart hits you for 180 damage!
forest heart hits you for 180 damage!
forest heart hits you for 180 damage!
forest heart hits you for 180 damage!
forest heart hits you for 180 damage!
:touch:
Botond said:ohohohoho QQ about a class gettin nerfed and nerfed and nerfed even tho its useless in most cases that can occur in rvr?thats a good one m8,now try QQ about smiterclerics >.<
Xplo said:That new Shortlegs group plays better then you guys imo![]()