Chronictank
FH is my second home
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2004
- Messages
- 10,133
Very interesting article, and to you european ba***** who say "lols im on 10 meg (yes im bitter :<) not mentioning any names Atos
. Uk broadband explained;
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2103-2330140_1,00.html
but take it with a pinch of salt:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2103-2330140_1,00.html
but take it with a pinch of salt:
tolien said:Saw that posted on ADSLguide.
I'm inclined to take the speed results with a tonne of salt though because unless you compare the speed you get to the sync rate you're at, you're hardly comparing like for like (unless you assume every ISP has the same spread of sync rates, isn't using traffic shaping to prioritise the AG speed tester etc). I'm still on home2000 so if I get a lower speedtest than someone that's synching at 8128kbps (and getting the full 7.2Mbps IP rate) it's hardly a shock.
To a point, it's the ASA that's at fault - they should be killing all the ads with "unlimited" (fair usage applies), "up to 8Mbps" (if you work for us, because we don't currently offer Max to our customers) and "free" (if you're giving us >£20 a month for your TV/Phone service)in them. 8Mbps' on services dependant on Max are a bit dodgy too, given you'll only get 7.2Mbps at most by the time ATM takes its cut.
But the ASA won't touch ISPs' web sites, so to a point they can get away with murder.
Ofcom's main interest is promoting competition (and keeping their NTL pension funds healthy), so as far as they're concerned as long as LLU keeps expanding (and NTL Telewest keep plodding along) they're happy.
The complaining about "up to" being unfair's a bit spurious though - no one has any idea what kind of speed you're going to get out of ADSL until you've got it, and the drive for "free" broadband's in the process of killing off any cause for investment in the local loop, so that isn't going to change soon - all you'll get is an LLU provider offering the same service, perhaps with a few tweaks as a result of using a new technology like ADSL2+.
The activation fee wouldn't come close to covering a proper "optimised routing" job like you (used to) get with SDSL either, and any increase would a) have the LLUers screaming and b) only make the joy of deferred activation fees worse.
The article blurs dodgy support into it too - if the ISP couldn't blame the bits between you and them that they can't control, they'd just blame something else. "It's the site your using, sir", or "It's your PC, have you tried restarting/reinstalling the OS/recharging the magic smoke container?".
Wouldn't work, unless you're up for a higher activation fee to cover the eventuality that your line can't hit the minimum.
It's Ofcom's pushing that keeps exchange VPs as tight as they are, and it's Ofcom that keeps Central prices as high as they are - so BTw aren't entirely to blame, and neither are the ISPs (though obviously neither apply to the LLUers or cablecos).
Agreed, though the two of them are more or less the one thing.
Not terribly useful. Performance can (and does) vary significantly with both time and area. Why do you think ADSLguide stopped publishing their top 10 speedtests...
There's a hell of a lot wrong, but there's equally a hell of a lot right.
In 2003, home500 was £98-£150 wiht a £150 activation fee (including USB modem, woooo!) - so in 3 years, the price you pay's dropped by a factor of at least 5, while the speed's increased by a factor of up to 16.
Long contracts are hardly abnormal either - the mobile networks have been doing them for years.
Now that's what I call a long post.
