- English -
Resident Freddy
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2004
- Messages
- 5,263
I get annoyed hearing of all the terrorism killing people in places like Iraq. Especially just after this disaster :/
well, you can blame Mr. Bush for the Iraq shit ... before he "rescued" and "cleaned" Iraq from the evil evil people there was no terrorist attacks and daily killings of soldiers etc .... THANK YOU MR. BUSH FOR DOING US THIS FAVOUR!- English - said:I get annoyed hearing of all the terrorism killing people in places like Iraq. Especially just after this disaster :/
Vilje said:There is an ethical difference between the Twin Towers and this disaster. Atleast many will feel like it is. In the Twin Towers 4000-5000 people were murdered.
Tuppe said:its like when US dropped 2 nuclear bomb to japan and how many japanese, childs, young, old, males and females, in end get killed? what i have read cancer is still killing japanese people, was it murder or war act? how twin towers different from this? i guess those stupid jerk terrorists think they are in war against US.
actually japan is the largest contributer at 500m currentlyBoomeruk said:USA: £18m
UK: £15m
Japan £15m
with the US being the largest donators....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4145259.stm said:Japan
$500m (£264m) in government donations
USA
$350m in government donations
Britain
$96m in government donations
Be happy they used those bombs, a full scale invasion in Japan would have costed millions of lives
fionnel said:a) Not true, Japan was isolated and w/o resources to keep this war for long. Nothing suggest they could hold on more than Germany did and that hardly cost as many lives.
b) There's a difference between killing army soldiers, however tragic that may be and just bombing unsuspected civilians.
It's pure propaganda bs that bombing was needed, it was just a show off.
Sorry for going off topic, carry on.
Ssera said:it would have taken far far longer and cost far more
Ssera said:a.) No, the Japanese Army would have fought to the death, just like they did in almost every battle they fought against the allies. An assault on the Japan and Tokyo itself would have resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths, and even more civilian casualties.
b.) True but people seem to forget that the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed less people combined than one night of bombing over Tokyo (the allies used incendiary bombs and as Tokyo was almost solely built with wood... well I'm sure you can imagine what happened).