The Greatest on Camlann
- Thread starter darkmanx
- Start date
Bonelamencer
One of Freddy's beloved
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2005
- Messages
- 1,060
Succi said:something along the lines of :
vinters
farek
jergiot
shadows
lethul
succi
zzang
sorusi
.. or lios alfar
ok ok,now go back into the kitchen and cook me something lady !
~Latency~
Can't get enough of FH
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2004
- Messages
- 1,517
Succi said:something along the lines of :
vinters
farek
jergiot
shadows
lethul
succi
zzang
sorusi
.. or lios alfar
Weren't even good though dunno how you can say that, all of you guys gaveup after being owned? Fair enough you were low RR and no toa etc, but you just flatout gaveup with it, even geared you were gonna be owned and you knew it ; ]
Lios Alfar? Lewl, they did no PvP till they all had ML10 and full ToA templates... most people on the server had lower than ml5 / scrappy templates.. met their main group and we owned them, they were missing a ml or two tho!1
EDIT : Some may say there were ubarawesome when they finally got all their shit together, maybe it's true.. but if you're good you don't need ml10 to compete.. you meet groups who don't even have higher than ml3 / rr6 and they are really good.. Lios just wanted every single advantage available - including a awesome setup ; unlike the other players of camlann who just formed guilds and ran with what they had!
~Latency~
Can't get enough of FH
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2004
- Messages
- 1,517
Succi said:
People from cluster are used to running setgroups with the best setup and being high rr, they realised at 50 that it will be a long long time before they can dominate and gaveup imo, not that they aren't good - but you guys weren't happy with some challenge of facing higher rr groups for a change (instead of being the high rr one) and you stopped?
old.windforce
Part of the furniture
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 3,415
Succi said:something along the lines of :
vinters
farek
jergiot
shadows
lethul
succi
zzang
sorusi
.. or lios alfar
All good players except succi the buffbotted mincer of no skill
Btw Horde run a group on cluster for a few weeks and didn't have much trouble to kill RR8-11 set groups.
Lios Alfar was good, Pinp might have radared (well your gay buddies) them down while they were doing pve but no way you would have beaten them pvp ready in strongest formation.
~Latency~
Can't get enough of FH
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2004
- Messages
- 1,517
old.windforce said:All good players except succi the buffbotted mincer of no skill
Btw Horde run a group on cluster for a few weeks and didn't have much trouble to kill RR8-11 set groups.
Lios Alfar was good, Pinp might have radared (well your gay buddies) them down while they were doing pve but no way you would have beaten them pvp ready in strongest formation.
We actually met their main group, when they all had ml5+ (guessing cuz' we saw them at ml7 a few days on) and prawned them, so how you can magically say for certain that we'd loose is stupid
old.windforce
Part of the furniture
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 3,415
~Latency~ said:
You don't understand the difference between a suboptimized, unfinished pve group and a fully toad rvr / pvp group?
Lios Alfar had some very strong, good players and a fixed group.
an tell you there isn't much difference between good players from German servers, english cluster and Camlann. Dunno if you are a good player since i never grouped with you and never fought you in decent 8v8 but i do know Angui radared. Wasn't Sroy in your group as well?
oh, the lios and nolby stuff again :O
lios: fix group, perfect temps, ml10 facing pugs with suboptimal setups. impressive! but they lost alot vs decent horde or nexus (yes, we were able to beat em! ;o) guildgroups, that did not play together for 3 years and were not ml10 and without fotm reavers bombing around. lios was not good at all and got owned on their previous servers alot.
nolby..or diva! dont divas cry alot when something aint perfect? fits so perfect. first of all, i think you had ml5+ at least the banelords and perfector ones :> not more than the average camlann player. but they got so owned so badly. instant down tbh...but there are the players like succi trying to keep the myth alive and blame templates and mls. but shouldnt such mighty mighty players win vs guild pugs that are full of "crap camlann players" ? just wondering... and not fixing temps/mls is just a nice excuse imo. but nevermind, keep spreading the rumours m8
you guys strongly remind me of tiarna. german fix group comming, losing alot, getting owned although being a setgroup but keeping spreading alot of rumours about camlann noobies, spamming one pic all the time where you can see 8 dead adrenaline ppl to support there rumours.
remember, it werent diva or any wannabe setgroup that actually rocked, more horde, ruin, adrenaline and, only if some, nexus groups.
i dont say that the players you mentioned are crap, they are great, but always keep in mind that they got owned alot on camlann (the low skilled players!) alot ;o
and mvv - sroy did not use radar until he finished his warlock, this is what i can tell you for sure in addition he did not run with ruin, his former guilds were adre and nexus.
furthermore "an tell you there isn't much difference between good players from German servers, english cluster and Camlann" by old_windforce -> the average of "skills" is the same everywhere... but i would say, that the "top players" of cam could easily compete with any setgroup of the cluster or any german server
dunno if anyone cares at all, but i think the text aboves includes more truth than any comment of formers "lets rock, oh qq lets give up" ppl
lios: fix group, perfect temps, ml10 facing pugs with suboptimal setups. impressive! but they lost alot vs decent horde or nexus (yes, we were able to beat em! ;o) guildgroups, that did not play together for 3 years and were not ml10 and without fotm reavers bombing around. lios was not good at all and got owned on their previous servers alot.
nolby..or diva! dont divas cry alot when something aint perfect? fits so perfect. first of all, i think you had ml5+ at least the banelords and perfector ones :> not more than the average camlann player. but they got so owned so badly. instant down tbh...but there are the players like succi trying to keep the myth alive and blame templates and mls. but shouldnt such mighty mighty players win vs guild pugs that are full of "crap camlann players" ? just wondering... and not fixing temps/mls is just a nice excuse imo. but nevermind, keep spreading the rumours m8
you guys strongly remind me of tiarna. german fix group comming, losing alot, getting owned although being a setgroup but keeping spreading alot of rumours about camlann noobies, spamming one pic all the time where you can see 8 dead adrenaline ppl to support there rumours.
remember, it werent diva or any wannabe setgroup that actually rocked, more horde, ruin, adrenaline and, only if some, nexus groups.
i dont say that the players you mentioned are crap, they are great, but always keep in mind that they got owned alot on camlann (the low skilled players!) alot ;o
and mvv - sroy did not use radar until he finished his warlock, this is what i can tell you for sure
in addition he did not run with ruin, his former guilds were adre and nexus.furthermore "an tell you there isn't much difference between good players from German servers, english cluster and Camlann" by old_windforce -> the average of "skills" is the same everywhere... but i would say, that the "top players" of cam could easily compete with any setgroup of the cluster or any german server
dunno if anyone cares at all, but i think the text aboves includes more truth than any comment of formers "lets rock, oh qq lets give up" ppl
~Latency~
Can't get enough of FH
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2004
- Messages
- 1,517
Shintari said:oh, the lios and nolby stuff again :O
lios: fix group, perfect temps, ml10 facing pugs with suboptimal setups. impressive! but they lost alot vs decent horde or nexus (yes, we were able to beat em! ;o) guildgroups, that did not play together for 3 years and were not ml10 and without fotm reavers bombing around. lios was not good at all and got owned on their previous servers alot.
nolby..or diva! dont divas cry alot when something aint perfect? fits so perfect. first of all, i think you had ml5+ at least the banelords and perfector ones :> not more than the average camlann player. but they got so owned so badly. instant down tbh...but there are the players like succi trying to keep the myth alive and blame templates and mls. but shouldnt such mighty mighty players win vs guild pugs that are full of "crap camlann players" ? just wondering... and not fixing temps/mls is just a nice excuse imo. but nevermind, keep spreading the rumours m8
you guys strongly remind me of tiarna. german fix group comming, losing alot, getting owned although being a setgroup but keeping spreading alot of rumours about camlann noobies, spamming one pic all the time where you can see 8 dead adrenaline ppl to support there rumours.
remember, it werent diva or any wannabe setgroup that actually rocked, more horde, ruin, adrenaline and, only if some, nexus groups.
i dont say that the players you mentioned are crap, they are great, but always keep in mind that they got owned alot on camlann (the low skilled players!) alot ;o
and mvv - sroy did not use radar until he finished his warlock, this is what i can tell you for sure
furthermore "an tell you there isn't much difference between good players from German servers, english cluster and Camlann" by old_windforce -> the average of "skills" is the same everywhere... but i would say, that the "top players" of cam could easily compete with any setgroup of the cluster or any german server
dunno if anyone cares at all, but i think the text aboves includes more truth than any comment of formers "lets rock, oh qq lets give up" ppl
Shintari is speaking the truth a lot lately ;d
he says pvp isnt my main server lol....im gonna have to agree with shintari
from my limited experience lios was probably the toughest fight, but for playing together 3 years and being ml10 setgroup they weren't that much harder than many other groups (horde castergroup and so on).
from my limited experience lios was probably the toughest fight, but for playing together 3 years and being ml10 setgroup they weren't that much harder than many other groups (horde castergroup and so on).
