the final solution

Karam_gruul · Jun 29, 2003

i've just been on holiday in france, which was nice, but i got talking to my brother while i was out there about britain and the state of it. and i 'think' i may well have come up with the best idea thats ever been thought of by anyone ever..

why dont we make people apply for licences to have kids? all male children should be sterelised at birth (which is reversable), and they should be forced to apply for a license before even thinking of having any kids. things like, how stable the marriage is, how long they've been together, weather either have been involved in drugs, crime or any other scumbag activity. weather either of the parents live on a council estate, weather they make enough to give they're child a good home to grow up in. that way we'd eradicate all the scum on the planet (council estate people) and all the scumbag druggies and theives at the same time!!!! omg its good in so many ways..

crime would drop so much because people would know they'll never have a child if they commit a crime of any description.. people would work harder to make more money for themselves, and benefit the economy at the same time..................... omg..

there is not a SINGLE argument that can be put against this idea, i tried it out on my brothers lefty bird, she's as far left as u can get, and she couldnt come up with a valid argument as to why this isnt the solution to all of man kinds problems.

o and kill all immigrants imo

Cloak_ · Jun 29, 2003

how about the fact that your taking ppl`s freedom of choice?

Karlo · Jun 29, 2003

its a good idea but...

It would drastically cut the population in a generation. There would be fewer people around to do the jobs and the economy would fail.

You would have hardly any choice in who you had children with, as, as has been stated, the population is cut.

So no, its not a good idea

Karam_gruul · Jun 29, 2003

because some people dont deserve freedom full stop. criminals, drug takers/dealers, commoners etc, they wont make good choices because they're stupid. need to eradicate them asap.

and its not taking peoples choices, its giving them the choice of being scum and wiping out they're family, or being a decent person and having a family.

Cloak_ · Jun 29, 2003

so we dont have that choice already ?

Karam_gruul · Jun 29, 2003

Originally posted by Karlo
its a good idea but...

It would drastically cut the population in a generation. There would be fewer people around to do the jobs and the economy would fail.

You would have hardly any choice in who you had children with, as, as has been stated, the population is cut.

So no, its not a good idea

my mate said that exact same thing.

jobs would drop yes, but so would demand. put it this way, before the licences, there would be 10 people buying 10 pints of milk from the shop, with 10 people stacking the shelves. after, there would only be 5 people wanting the milk, therefore 5 pints of milk, and 5 people stacking the shelves.

it would even itself out. we're over populated as it is. we'd just need less supply, which would be fine because we'd have less people to create this supply.

Karam_gruul · Jun 29, 2003

Originally posted by Cloak_
so we dont have that choice already ?

urr, of course we do. alot of people are too scummy to realise tho, its about eradicating that kind of person.

old.m0000 · Jun 29, 2003

Originally posted by Karam_gruul
because some people dont deserve freedom full stop. criminals, drug takers/dealers, commoners etc, they wont make good choices because they're stupid. need to eradicate them asap.

and its not taking peoples choices, its giving them the choice of being scum and wiping out they're family, or being a decent person and having a family.

you forgot townies and generally people who I don't like.

Trinilim · Jun 29, 2003

Originally posted by Karam_gruul

why dont we make people apply for licences to have kids? all male children should be sterelised at birth (which is reversable),

yeah, and let's club baby seals to make shoes, they come back anyway...

Driwen · Jun 29, 2003

unless you kill all the people who are close to retirying(sp?)/are retired then you will have an ecomic problem

. As people who work now pay partially the support for the ones who are not working, now people who are retired get money from their pension funds/goverment. Both might get into problems if there are suddenly WAY less people working and giving money to the pension funds/paying taxes.

Kagato. · Jun 29, 2003

Cutting the population drastically would be a good thing, the world is already to over populated as it is. And theres really no need for couples to be having 3,4 or even more kids in one family, heck 1 kid is to much to put up with at the best of times, how they can cope I don't know.

And whilst I don't agree with the council estate comments (yes some council estates are hell holes, could even go as far as to say most are, but some ARE nice, usually the ones with older people in them admittedly), its not a bad idea in theory, but much like the identity tag ideas that have gone around its unlikely to be implemented, the government is to obsessed with its politically correct bullshit to try it.

o and kill all immigrants imo

I ought to read these off topic forums more often.

Eblessair · Jun 29, 2003

Re: Re: the final solution

Originally posted by Trinilim
yeah, and let's club baby seals to make shoes, they come back anyway...

:chortle:

Karam_gruul · Jun 29, 2003

Originally posted by driwen
unless you kill all the people who are close to retirying(sp?)/are retired then you will have an ecomic problem. As people who work now pay partially the support for the ones who are not working, now people who are retired get money from their pension funds/goverment. Both might get into problems if there are suddenly WAY less people working and giving money to the pension funds/paying taxes.

and THATS where i introduce my policy on putting old people to sleep when they hit 60

-Nuked- · Jun 29, 2003

its a shame really ... hitler could have really used a guy like you around the bunker

Exiled · Jun 29, 2003

so if you dont let ppl like you get born, how would you get born and post the idea to stop others getting born ?

Karam_gruul · Jun 29, 2003

Originally posted by Exiled
so if you dont let ppl like you get born, how would you get born and post the idea to stop others getting born ?

i said nothing about killing off increadibly sexy, intelligent all round great people....

Exiled · Jun 29, 2003

Originally posted by Karam_gruul
the scum on the planet (council estate people) and all the scumbag druggies and theives at the same time!!!!

no you didnt, you said the, ^^

Karam_gruul · Jun 29, 2003

Originally posted by Exiled
no you didnt, you said the, ^^

and.. i dont live on a council estate, and im not a criminal....... your point is being lost me thinks

old.Dillinja · Jun 29, 2003

Sounds a lot like the Nazi's idea about killing off Jews in WW2.

Exiled · Jun 29, 2003

Originally posted by Karam_gruul
and.. i dont live on a council estate, and im not a criminal....... your point is being lost me thinks

you missed druggie or did you do that for a reason ?

-Nuked- · Jun 29, 2003

sounds like someone wants to continue where hitler left of imo

Karam_gruul · Jun 29, 2003

not really, hitler was a bit nutts.. i have a similar attitude to him, in that i think people need to be controlled otherwise everything will be fucked up. but killing people outright like he did was rediculous, especially a race or religion (however u term it) like the jews who hadnt done anything wrong. might be able to understand it if he did it to muslims post 9/11 tho tbh, but for the record so i dont get banned, i aint saying i'd agree with him killing off muslims post 9/11, just saying i might be able to understand why.

humans do need some form of control tho, definatly. we're only animals, and all animals have higher animals controlling them. on a much smaller scale in most cases of course, eg lions in a pride would have an alpha male that'd just pwn any of them if they do something wrong. obviously thats more on a family scale. but looking at something like ants, who have 1 controlling queen of the nest, that they never argue with and always follow. and look how uber they are. they aint sitting around giving 'ant' rights to little ants that go around mugging other little ants. they'd rip its face off.

Karlo · Jun 30, 2003

Originally posted by Karam_gruul
and THATS where i introduce my policy on putting old people to sleep when they hit 60

can we make it 55, before they start to smell.

Repent Reloaded · Jun 30, 2003

licence Karam imo.

chi_ · Jun 30, 2003

Originally posted by Karam_gruul
i've just been on holiday in france, which was nice, but i got talking to my brother while i was out there about britain and the state of it. and i 'think' i may well have come up with the best idea thats ever been thought of by anyone ever..

why dont we make people apply for licences to have kids? all male children should be sterelised at birth (which is reversable), and they should be forced to apply for a license before even thinking of having any kids. things like, how stable the marriage is, how long they've been together, weather either have been involved in drugs, crime or any other scumbag activity. weather either of the parents live on a council estate, weather they make enough to give they're child a good home to grow up in. that way we'd eradicate all the scum on the planet (council estate people) and all the scumbag druggies and theives at the same time!!!! omg its good in so many ways..

crime would drop so much because people would know they'll never have a child if they commit a crime of any description.. people would work harder to make more money for themselves, and benefit the economy at the same time..................... omg..

there is not a SINGLE argument that can be put against this idea, i tried it out on my brothers lefty bird, she's as far left as u can get, and she couldnt come up with a valid argument as to why this isnt the solution to all of man kinds problems.

o and kill all immigrants imo

And bring humans one step closer to being robots?

Nichneven · Jun 30, 2003

Originally posted by Karam_gruul
i've just been on holiday in france, which was nice, but i got talking to my brother while i was out there about britain and the state of it. and i 'think' i may well have come up with the best idea thats ever been thought of by anyone ever..

why dont we make people apply for licences to have kids? all male children should be sterelised at birth (which is reversable), and they should be forced to apply for a license before even thinking of having any kids. things like, how stable the marriage is, how long they've been together, weather either have been involved in drugs, crime or any other scumbag activity. weather either of the parents live on a council estate, weather they make enough to give they're child a good home to grow up in. that way we'd eradicate all the scum on the planet (council estate people) and all the scumbag druggies and theives at the same time!!!! omg its good in so many ways..

crime would drop so much because people would know they'll never have a child if they commit a crime of any description.. people would work harder to make more money for themselves, and benefit the economy at the same time..................... omg..

there is not a SINGLE argument that can be put against this idea, i tried it out on my brothers lefty bird, she's as far left as u can get, and she couldnt come up with a valid argument as to why this isnt the solution to all of man kinds problems.

o and kill all immigrants imo

uhm... what about sperm banks? :uhoh:

k9awya · Jun 30, 2003

every problem is solved if you remove the roids

sigh · Jun 30, 2003

Errmmm you would have increased tax's due to over populated middle age and old fart generation needing pentions, and not enough youthful wippersnappers paying there dues, then the youth would get pissed off at having to surport there elders with whooping huge tax's slapped on here there and evey where and OMG....
Strikes and roits would break out, then they would vote for lib dems or some other pansy loving party! I think it would be the end of the world as we know it tbh.

edit # bah nerf me not reading other peoples posters saying the samething before me =F

villageidiot · Jun 30, 2003

you cant go tinkering with a childs john thomas, there must be a law against it

Trinilim · Jun 30, 2003

Originally posted by villageidiot
you cant go tinkering with a childs john thomas, there must be a law against it

no law against circumsion :great:

But something as far as cutting the poor kid's tube is just plain sick and inhumane.

the final solution

Karam_gruul

Guest

Cloak_

Guest

Karlo

Guest

Karam_gruul

Guest

Cloak_

Guest

Karam_gruul

Guest

Karam_gruul

Guest

old.m0000

Guest

Trinilim

Guest

Driwen

Guest

Kagato.

Guest

Eblessair

Guest

Karam_gruul

Guest

-Nuked-

Guest

Exiled

Guest

Karam_gruul

Guest

Exiled

Guest

Karam_gruul

Guest

old.Dillinja

Guest

Exiled

Guest

-Nuked-

Guest

Karam_gruul

Guest

Karlo

Guest

Repent Reloaded

Guest

chi_

Guest

Nichneven

Guest

k9awya

Guest

sigh

Guest

villageidiot

Guest

Trinilim

Guest

Users who are viewing this thread