T
throdgrain
Guest
- Thread starter
- #61
Indeed, the off button is generally the only censor required .
It's not unusual however to see bodies, body parts, etc when reporting on war scenes/suicide bombers. News programmes in the UK, particularly with war stories, have pretty much given up trying to completely sanitise these events - in most cases such scenes would be impossible to film otherwise (i.e. there would be no shots available that were on topic that didn't contain blood n' guts)Originally posted by throdgrain
Durzel, fair point you have made, though I dont believe its usual on the news to show the bodies of crime victims or whatever.
Indeed. One might argue that in not giving scenes of carnage more than x minutes air time, they're trivialising the lives of those that died. To put a different slant on it.there is a slight difference between the news and a full blown documentary though.
Originally posted by Durzel
Indeed. One might argue that in not giving scenes of carnage more than x minutes air time, they're trivialising the lives of those that died. To put a different slant on it.
Originally posted by granny
Did you see the Sopranos on E4 lastnight? Wanna bet on how many more episodes Ralphy's got before someone clips him?![]()
Originally posted by old.Kez
throd: No, I'm quite happy being an anonymous twat. There are a couple here who've seen my photograph, and they'd be sure to vouch for my immaturity or rancid features - whichever - as thats clearly what you're fishing for. I'm not entirely sure it comes into play here, though.
"Although the subject matter and content of the programme approached the limits of what is allowed by the programme code, those limits were not exceeded," the Independent Television Commission (ITC) ruled.