O
old.giriam
Guest
- Thread starter
- #61
Originally posted by Lessurl
3. Comparing the void eld to fire wiz is what makes me laugh most. Perhaps fire wiz is what void should have been, being the damage spec in the magic realm. But saying we should get a spec dd aswell as a more powerful bolt, lol, how overpowered do you want hib?!? Void elds have far more utility than fire wizzies if both spec for final bolt. We get stun, (and if we go light) range debuff and mez.
The stun now lasts for about 1 second longer than it takes to cast it at most, wizards get a 76 second (thats baseline, and its cold damage so in effect its a lot shorter) root. I would trade away the aoe mez (50% drop off at edges, coldbased, short duration to begin with) and the stun any day of the week for their basedamage and root.
All the crowdcontrol in the world wont help you if you dont deal damage, thats why you dont see bards running around soloing in rvr.
and if you like hanging around amg with a zerg and getting a few bolt kills in then by all means continue to do so, im just saying that void deals *significantly* less damage than other pure casters (mind you i dont know the midgard numbers by heart) and the CC it gets to "make up for it" is laughably bad.
If void is your primary speccline then you get bad damage AND bad cc, i would prefer it if it did one of the things good and forget the other.
G