Gwadien
Uneducated Northern Cretin
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2006
- Messages
- 19,842
Aye but he had a long life. Tbh its not a shame if you get over 90 and used it well.Damn shame
Oh. I dunno. He saved kids. And we've got lots of them.A proper hero.
Oh. I dunno. He saved kids. And we've got lots of them.
Global warming and overpopulation and all, y'know...
Yes of course, but he was privileged and millions died forgotten in muddy fields fighting fascism.
It hardly compares does it.
I saved some Jewish kids because I'm nice.
I risked my life everyday, living knee deep in shit, away from my loved ones and eventually got shot in the face.
Nope, not in the same ballpark.
Nah mate, you're a cock.Oh lordy, stop believing the hype, well connected priviliged man saves a few hundred kids...very commendable, but to call that a greater personal act of heroism than someone who goes over to fight in the battlefield is a prime example of our simplistic reward system for emotions, making a good story trumps 50 million lives.
As Stalin should have said one feel good story is fantastic, a million deaths is statistics.
Through his entire act of bravery he never went short of tea and biscuits at elevens's.
The same reason we praise goal scorers more than defenders..it's called grabbing the limelight and we have a part in our brain that burys the reality under the carpet to make way for a hero.
Gwadian is full of teenage angst.
Job has a point, it's just not in any way relevant to the thread.
Not single handedly. He used a lot of other people. But he did instigate itNah, Job just thinks that because he wasn't using a gun, he doesn't deserve recognition.
Fact is, he single handledly saved those lives - you hear about many stories of soldiers, and there's so many events to remember them and to appreciate them.
I'm not dismissing his brave efforts, I'm just saying leaving your loved ones to risk your life on a daily basis in dreadful conditions is braver than what he did..far..far braver, but the anoniminity of the death of grunts doesn't make such a good story.
The guy refused to go to war at first, whatever the validity of his reasons, he let other people go to fight, the war hadn't even started when he arranged trains to rescue the kids.
it's just that fighting and dying is a bazillion times more heroic and the guys on the ground saved far more, but it's easier to praise one containable effort.
Aye its just following orders. To be slaughtered. The brain washing has happened before to make you think its a good thing.It was obviously more useful to be in the position he was in, to be able to help the amount of people he did. No? People love to hear a story of an underdog, but still, he made more use than if he'd played a martyr I'd say.
You need to see the whole picture, be objective about it to reach your objectives imo. Your way of thinking is more childish. No offence.
I don't agree, and think your childishness and naivety shines through here. There's nothing heroic about killing or being killed.