Sick people in Barnsley
- Thread starter Thadius
- Start date
Morchaoron
Fledgling Freddie
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 2,714
Well its sick but not nearly as sick as the catkiller that was walking around here a few months ago, ill (try to) translate it:
"De weblogs GeenStijl, VKmag en de gruwelsite Ogrish.com hebben met behulp van bezoekers waarschijnlijk de maker van een kattenmoordfilmpje ontmaskerd. Ook degene die het fimpje op internet zette is getraceerd. Beiden zijn woonachtig in België.
Op het filmpje is onder meer te zien dat een jong katje door een man wordt rondgeslingerd. Vervolgens probeert hij het inmiddels duizelige katje te onthoofden met een mes dat niet al te scherp is. Na drie keer hakken en snijden bloedt het jonge poesje al stuiptrekkend dood. Daarna zie je een oudere kat (wellicht de moederkat?) aan het dode bebloede beestje likken."
The weblogs Geenstijl, VKmag and the horrorsite Ogrish.com have with the help of visitors, unmasked the possible maker of a catkilling movie. They also traced the one that put the movie on the internet, both live in Belgium.
In the movie you can see how a young kitten is being spun around in the air. Then he tries to behead the dizzy kitten with a knife that isnt too sharp. After chopping it three times the kitten bleeds to death while still trying to move. After that you see an older cat (the mother?) licking the dead blood drenched animal.
The newssite even put the movie there, and if even ogrish thinks its sick then you can guess what it was like
uke:
"De weblogs GeenStijl, VKmag en de gruwelsite Ogrish.com hebben met behulp van bezoekers waarschijnlijk de maker van een kattenmoordfilmpje ontmaskerd. Ook degene die het fimpje op internet zette is getraceerd. Beiden zijn woonachtig in België.
Op het filmpje is onder meer te zien dat een jong katje door een man wordt rondgeslingerd. Vervolgens probeert hij het inmiddels duizelige katje te onthoofden met een mes dat niet al te scherp is. Na drie keer hakken en snijden bloedt het jonge poesje al stuiptrekkend dood. Daarna zie je een oudere kat (wellicht de moederkat?) aan het dode bebloede beestje likken."
The weblogs Geenstijl, VKmag and the horrorsite Ogrish.com have with the help of visitors, unmasked the possible maker of a catkilling movie. They also traced the one that put the movie on the internet, both live in Belgium.
In the movie you can see how a young kitten is being spun around in the air. Then he tries to behead the dizzy kitten with a knife that isnt too sharp. After chopping it three times the kitten bleeds to death while still trying to move. After that you see an older cat (the mother?) licking the dead blood drenched animal.
The newssite even put the movie there, and if even ogrish thinks its sick then you can guess what it was like
uke:
UndyingAngel
Can't get enough of FH
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2004
- Messages
- 1,957
Ezteq said:
yeah where is my <3
but that is suck :E
haarewin
Fledgling Freddie
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2004
- Messages
- 2,756
Bugz said:
i'm sorry, but no.
animals do not live as long as humans. a kitten would live around 14 years. a human would live ~75 (probably longer for this generation).
the 2 girls that got murdered by Ian Huntley lost (combined) around 130 years of life. therefore, Ian Huntley should never be allowed out of jail.
someone that killed (for example) a 5 year old dairy cow would, by your belief, be imprisoned for life because they killed a cow that could expect to see 18 more months. im not saying they shouldnt be punished, but life imprisonment seems ludicrous.
the life sentence is only like 20 years anyway.
omg Morch that made me want to puke, its the general sadism thats usually found when people kill animals that staggers me i mean wtf could a kitten ever, ever do to make you want to kill it??
On a slightly different angle im not sure of the exact stat's but it has been proven that there is a link between animal cruelty and serious crimes against people, it seems that a lot of violent/sadistic criminals (im not talking your spur of the moment crime of passion people) i.e serial killers start with inflictling harm even killing family pets or pets of people in their neighbourhoods then when this fails to satisfy them they progress upwards to more violent acts and then on to people.
Now i know that you cant imprison people for what they might do but surely people convicted of seriously viscious crimes against animals (im not talking neglect here, its usually the thick, bone idle slobs that are guilty of this) then this should be kept on record, and as far as i know if a child shows signs of psychopathy for example animal abuse or even abuse of other children (but generally that would be too much of a step foward and they start with little things that cant fight back or tell on them) and has sadistic tendancys this can not be kept on record*.
So maybe you would think that if a child has exhibited such tell tale signs as this and it is kept on record then if they ever come under suspicion for a serious crime in their adult life these records can be examined, compairing wound patterns say or method of infliction (which could work for or against the suspect as it is often the case that multiple killers usually stick to a set pattern) admittedly people change while growing but some things may stay the same and it would give the police a hell of a heads up when searching for a violent suspect.
I'm not saying throw everyone guilty of abusing an animal in prison ( as much as i'd like to i realise that with our already overcrowded prison system this is impractical) and if it were up to me personally i'd happily stick them in a cage with a tiger see how they like it, but i do seriously think that the police/social services should take these facts in to consideration and see that animal abuse isn't the petty crime they seem to put it down as and is infact a serious crime in its self (if they don't feel it bad enough that this person is torturing animals maybe when/if they progress to torturing people then they will pay atention).
(*as far as i know in this country a child can not be diagnosed as being psychopathic, which is daft because if they are caught early the treatment they could receive might actually prevent any of the serious symptoms from coming out.... but im not going in to the murky depths of child psychopaths)
On a slightly different angle im not sure of the exact stat's but it has been proven that there is a link between animal cruelty and serious crimes against people, it seems that a lot of violent/sadistic criminals (im not talking your spur of the moment crime of passion people) i.e serial killers start with inflictling harm even killing family pets or pets of people in their neighbourhoods then when this fails to satisfy them they progress upwards to more violent acts and then on to people.
Now i know that you cant imprison people for what they might do but surely people convicted of seriously viscious crimes against animals (im not talking neglect here, its usually the thick, bone idle slobs that are guilty of this) then this should be kept on record, and as far as i know if a child shows signs of psychopathy for example animal abuse or even abuse of other children (but generally that would be too much of a step foward and they start with little things that cant fight back or tell on them) and has sadistic tendancys this can not be kept on record*.
So maybe you would think that if a child has exhibited such tell tale signs as this and it is kept on record then if they ever come under suspicion for a serious crime in their adult life these records can be examined, compairing wound patterns say or method of infliction (which could work for or against the suspect as it is often the case that multiple killers usually stick to a set pattern) admittedly people change while growing but some things may stay the same and it would give the police a hell of a heads up when searching for a violent suspect.
I'm not saying throw everyone guilty of abusing an animal in prison ( as much as i'd like to i realise that with our already overcrowded prison system this is impractical) and if it were up to me personally i'd happily stick them in a cage with a tiger see how they like it, but i do seriously think that the police/social services should take these facts in to consideration and see that animal abuse isn't the petty crime they seem to put it down as and is infact a serious crime in its self (if they don't feel it bad enough that this person is torturing animals maybe when/if they progress to torturing people then they will pay atention).
(*as far as i know in this country a child can not be diagnosed as being psychopathic, which is daft because if they are caught early the treatment they could receive might actually prevent any of the serious symptoms from coming out.... but im not going in to the murky depths of child psychopaths)
Ingafgrinn Macabre
Can't get enough of FH
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2004
- Messages
- 3,155
Sick... Some people really are just plain sick and need to be incarcerated ASAP...
Totally agree, except that a child below the (mental) age of approx. 6~8 yrs in general doesn't have an idea yet of how its actions affect other people or creatures. The brain hasn't evolved / learned enough yet. This is one of the reasons children in general tend to be much crueler then adults.
Ezteq said:
Totally agree, except that a child below the (mental) age of approx. 6~8 yrs in general doesn't have an idea yet of how its actions affect other people or creatures. The brain hasn't evolved / learned enough yet. This is one of the reasons children in general tend to be much crueler then adults.
nakkiel
Fledgling Freddie
- Joined
- May 9, 2004
- Messages
- 330
Its the whole leeds/sheep and general Yorkshire/animal thing.
News from Yorskhire
Extract from the Yorkshire Evening Post:
"A drunk who claimed he had been raped by a dog was yesterday jailed for 12 months by a judge. Martin Hoyle, 45, was arrested by police after a passing motorist and his girlfriend found a Staffordshire bull terrier, called Badger, having sex with him at the side of a road in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire.
Prosecutor Ben Crosland said the couple had stopped to help because they thought Hoyle was being attacked by the animal. But when they got closer they saw that he had his trousers round his ankles, was down on all fours and the dog was straddling him from behind.
"The defendant mumbled something about the dog having taken a liking to him," said Mr Crosland. "The couple were extremely offended and sickened by what they saw." Another passing motorist contacted the police and Hoyle was arrested as he walked with the dog down the road.
Hoyle, of East view, Marsh, Huddersfield, told police "I can't help it if the dog took a liking to me. He tried to rape me."
He repeated the rape allegation at the police station and added "The dog pulled my trousers down." Hoyle, who has had a long-standing alcohol problem, was jailed for 12 months after he admitted committing an act which outraged public decency.
His barrister said Hoyle had no memory of the incident because of his drunken state, but was now very remorseful and incredibly embarrassed.
Jailing him, Judge Alistair McCallum told Hoyle "Never before in my time at the bar or on the bench have I ever had to deal with somebody who voluntarily allowed himself to be buggered by a dog on the public highway. Frankly it is beyond most of our comprehension. It is an absolutely disgusting thing for members of the public to have to witness.
News from Yorskhire
Extract from the Yorkshire Evening Post:
"A drunk who claimed he had been raped by a dog was yesterday jailed for 12 months by a judge. Martin Hoyle, 45, was arrested by police after a passing motorist and his girlfriend found a Staffordshire bull terrier, called Badger, having sex with him at the side of a road in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire.
Prosecutor Ben Crosland said the couple had stopped to help because they thought Hoyle was being attacked by the animal. But when they got closer they saw that he had his trousers round his ankles, was down on all fours and the dog was straddling him from behind.
"The defendant mumbled something about the dog having taken a liking to him," said Mr Crosland. "The couple were extremely offended and sickened by what they saw." Another passing motorist contacted the police and Hoyle was arrested as he walked with the dog down the road.
Hoyle, of East view, Marsh, Huddersfield, told police "I can't help it if the dog took a liking to me. He tried to rape me."
He repeated the rape allegation at the police station and added "The dog pulled my trousers down." Hoyle, who has had a long-standing alcohol problem, was jailed for 12 months after he admitted committing an act which outraged public decency.
His barrister said Hoyle had no memory of the incident because of his drunken state, but was now very remorseful and incredibly embarrassed.
Jailing him, Judge Alistair McCallum told Hoyle "Never before in my time at the bar or on the bench have I ever had to deal with somebody who voluntarily allowed himself to be buggered by a dog on the public highway. Frankly it is beyond most of our comprehension. It is an absolutely disgusting thing for members of the public to have to witness.
Mikah75
Can't get enough of FH
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2004
- Messages
- 3,251
thats dogs btw, cats can live up to a average age of 17ish, my cat lived til 21haarewin said:
and that kitten video sounds fucking sick, would love to watch them being chopped up, not that i would care, poor animals, hate people who abuse animals, especially babies.
Cadiva
Part of the furniture
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 593
nakkiel said:
Yes because Barnsley's next door to Leeds - not.
Funnily enough, neither is Huddersfield.
And given that both Barnsley and Huddersfield are supposedly 'industrial urban areas' I'd be highly surprised at you finding any sheep in close proximity to either place.
Still, I suppose it's easy to refer to the age old cliches when referring to Yorkshire.
Job
The Carl Pilkington of Freddyshouse
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 21,652
It's horrible because we have accepted the Dog as a human friend, I know plenty of people who wan't to kill next doors cat cos it shits on their lawn
Honestly they get so angry, they have screaming rows with the neighbour and fall out, which is so frookin monumentally ridiculous I don't know where to start.
They are so frekin anal about their personal space and 'groomed' lawns that they lose touch with reality, some of the stalk the cat till the early hours with an air pistol and then repeat these stories in work without comprehending how utterly insane it is, these same people want the trees cutting down in their road cos the sap falls on their cars and scream at nieghbours for feeding birds that then crapp on their cars
Fukin suburbia all wankers.
Honestly they get so angry, they have screaming rows with the neighbour and fall out, which is so frookin monumentally ridiculous I don't know where to start.
They are so frekin anal about their personal space and 'groomed' lawns that they lose touch with reality, some of the stalk the cat till the early hours with an air pistol and then repeat these stories in work without comprehending how utterly insane it is, these same people want the trees cutting down in their road cos the sap falls on their cars and scream at nieghbours for feeding birds that then crapp on their cars
Fukin suburbia all wankers.
haarewin said:
Every arguement has more than one context to it though.
The way i see it as: if you take the life of something with intention then you should have your life taken off you.
Let's take your idea into context. Cat has roughly four months to live. Yobs find the cat, torture it and burn in - resulting in murder. The yobs, faced in court, get three months in jail. This could very easily get out of hand. Big Dave wants Little Timmy to kill the dog next door because he hates his neightbours. Little Timmy kills pet, gets rewarded, goes to prison for four weeks because the dog was soon to die anyway and sits on a nice paycheck.