Should I....

Trem

Not as old as he claims to be!
Moderator
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,293
Seriously considering an Audi RS4(2001 shape).

I haven't read many bad reviews about them apart from the sloppy gear change.

Any of you guys have any views on them?
 

Tom

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
17,687
I had a 2001 TT and the quality was woeful. It put me right off the marque.

Whats your budget? There are a great many alternatives that would blow the RS4 away.

I'm biased, but just take a sniff around the TVR Cerbera. Not much would get past that, ever.
 

Trem

Not as old as he claims to be!
Moderator
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,293
I'm quite sure the RS4 is quicker than the TVR. RS4 is 380 bhp standard with twin turbos and the 0-60 is around 4.5 seconds iirc.

I have always wanted one, well my dad always said he would get me an RS2 when he won the lottery but that never happened and the RS4 is the newer version of them. Its all a bit romantic for my dad tbh, still wouldn't mind an RS2 but they look dated now.

Budget is around the MY2001 RS4 money mark, not sure I can say it out loud :eek6:

I want a turbo car though, not an Evo or Impreza, gone off them and I think the spoilers look a bit sad now. God I'm getting old.

Don't forget I have 2 dogs and a son, my mate suggested a 350z but it isn't practical.
 

Tom

I am a FH squatter
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
17,687
Not a chance of the RS4 being quicker mate. Not a chance in hell, except perhaps in tight corners. Theres a race on the internet somewhere, some Clarkson video that begins with a 5 litre Griffith. Anyhow they put the Cerbera up against a Ferrari, Esprit, 911, Caterham, and a couple of other cars, and it utterly destroys them on a straight line.

Have an ask here:

http://www.pistonheads.co.uk/gassing/forum.asp?f=6&h=0
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,445
The RS4 is supposedly OK, fast but not a particularly inspiring drive, and is kinda prone to bending wheel rims. My suggestion would be a Lotus Carlton. Same price, bit older but SO much cooler.
 

Trem

Not as old as he claims to be!
Moderator
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,293
Bodhi said:
The RS4 is supposedly OK, fast but not a particularly inspiring drive, and is kinda prone to bending wheel rims. My suggestion would be a Lotus Carlton. Same price, bit older but SO much cooler.

Find me a good one and I would be mega interested.

OR

A Ferrari Lancia.

*fap*
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,445
I found a couple of Auto Trader earlier, both around the same price as an RS4. Only problem was I could only find em on a Nationwide search, so you might have to travel to look at them. Totally worth it tho.
 

Frizz

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
1,684
Ugh, those look like a cross between an old Merc and a Sierra. :/

TVR Sagaris, if you can. :)
 

Trem

Not as old as he claims to be!
Moderator
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,293
I can't have a TVR ginga cameramen have them :(














*wub Tom*
 

Frizz

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
1,684
The Power Laps list (From Top Gear :)) is pretty useful for performance, if that's what you really want.
Power Laps

The Stig driving a Pagani Zonda-FIn the Power Laps segment, the Stig completes a lap around the Top Gear test track to gauge the performance of various cars.

The car raced by the Stig is usually a car that was reviewed by one of the presenters that episode, but sometimes it is a car reviewed from a previous programme. There are two separate lists, one for production cars and one for non-production cars.

There is a separate unofficial board of times for non-production car times. The qualifications for the normal Power Lap Board is that the car being tested must be a road-worthy car.[17][Quote from source requested on talk page to verify interpretation of source] For example, the Ariel Atom managed to squeak by onto the Power Lap board only because it could get over a speed bump.[18] The four times include:

0:31.2 – BAE Sea Harrier
0:59.0 – Renault R24 Formula 1 Car
1:08.6 – Aston Martin DBR9
1.19.0 – Radical
Note: The following laps were clocked with the tested vehicle configured for maximum performance. That is to say, all adjustable suspensions were set at their most efficient, all gear shift maps were at their most aggressive, and driving aids such as traction control were deactivated. These lap times do not offer entirely reliable comparisons between the cars - the conditions are far from controlled.

1:17.6 – Koenigsegg CCX (w/TG wing)
1:18.4 – Pagani Zonda F
1:18.9 – Maserati MC12
1.19.0 – Ferrari Enzo Ferrari
1:19.5 – Ariel Atom 2 300
1:19.8 – Porsche Carrera GT
1:20.4 – Koenigsegg CCX (Original)5
1:20.7 – Ascari KZ1
1:20.9 – Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren
1:21.9 – Ford GT
1:22.3 – Ferrari 360 CS
1:22.3 – Porsche 911 GT3 RS
1:22.4 – Chevrolet Corvette Z06
1:22.5 – Noble M15
1:22.6 – Westfield XTR25
1:22.9 – Ferrari F430 F1
1:23.2 – Ferrari F430 Spider F1
1:23.7 – Lamborghini Murciélago
1:23.8 – Pagani Zonda C12 S 7.31
1:23.9 – Koenigsegg CC8S
1:24.3 – Prodrive P2
1:24.6 – TVR Sagaris
1:24.8 – Mitsubishi Evo VIII MR FQ-400
1:24.8 – TVR Tuscan Mk.II
1:25.0 – Noble M12 GTO-3R
1:25.1 – Lotus Exige S
1:25.7 – Lamborghini Gallardo Spyder
1:25.8 – Lamborghini Gallardo2
1:25.9 – Morgan Aero 8 GTN
1:26.0 – BMW Z4 M Roadster
1:26.0 – Mitsubishi Evo VIII MR FQ-320
1:26.2 – BMW M5
1:26.4 – Lotus Exige1
1:26.7 – Porsche Cayman S
1:26.8 – Chevrolet Corvette
1:26.8 – Ferrari 575M Maranello HGTC
1:26.9 – Mercedes-Benz CLS55 AMG
1:27.1 – Aston Martin Vanquish S
1:27.1 – Aston Martin DB9
1:27.2 – Porsche 911 GT32
1:27.3 – Spyker C8 Spyder
1:27.5 – TVR T350c
1:27.9 – Wiesmann MF 3
1:28.0 – BMW M3 CSL2
1:28.2 – Marcos TSO GT2
1:28.5 – Dodge Viper SRT-102
1:28.6 – MG XPower SV
1:28.7 – Porsche Boxster S
1:28.9 – Porsche 911 Carrera S3
1:28.9 – Mitsubishi Lancer Evo VIII5
1:29.0 – Mercedes-Benz CL65 AMG
1:29.0 – Alpina V8 Roadster2
1:29.0 – Lamborghini Murciélago1, 5
1:29.4 – Subaru Impreza WRX STi WR-1
1:30.0 – Alfa Romeo 147 GTA 3.7
1:30.1 – Subaru Impreza WRX STi5
1:30.1 – Vauxhall Monaro VXR
1:30.4 – Aston Martin DB7 GT
1:30.4 – Volkswagen Golf R32
1:30.9 – Audi S4 quattro 4.2
1:31.0 – Porsche 911 Turbo2
1:31.3 – Vauxhall VX220 Turbo
1:31.6 – Honda NSX Type-R2
1:31.8 – BMW M3
1:31.8 – BMW 535d
1:31.8 – Nissan 350Z
1:31.8 – Mazda RX-8
1:31.9 – BMW 130i
1:32.2 – Ford Focus RS
1:32.2 – Mazda6 MPS
1:32.5 – Lotus Esprit V8
1:32.5 – Renaultsport Mégane 225 Cup
1:32.7 – Audi TT quattro 3.2
1:32.8 – Modernized Jaguar E-Type
1:32.9 – Mercedes-Benz SLK350
1:33.0 – Mercedes-Benz SL55 AMG2
1:33.0 – Vauxhall Astra VXR
1:33.1 – Noble M12 GTO2
1:33.3 – Volkswagen Golf R32
1:33.3 – Cadillac CTS-V2
1:33.7 – MG ZT 260
1:33.8 – Renaultsport Clio 182 Cup
1:33.9 – Holden Monaro2
1:34.5 – Ford Mondeo ST220
1:34.9 – Ford Focus ST4
1:35.0 – Volvo S60 R
1:35.1 – Volkswagen Golf GTI
1:35.2 – Ferrari 575M Maranello3,5
1:35.3 – Vauxhall Vectra VXR
1:35.6 – Alfa Romeo 147 GTA
1:35.6 – Lotus Elise2
1:36.2 – Aston Martin V12 Vanquish3,5
1:36.2 – Renaultsport Clio V63
1:36.5 – Honda Civic Type-R
1.37.0 – Porsche Boxster2
1.37.3 – BMW Z4 3.0i2
1.37.4 – Honda S20002
1:37.9 – Saab 9-5 HOT Aero
1:38.0 – Maserati 3200 GT2
1:39.4 – Bowler Wildcat
1:40.8 – Bentley Arnage T2
1:44.0 – Overfinch 580 S2
1:46.0 – Aston Martin DB5

1 (Mildly) moist track (the presenters claim this negatively affects track times by around 2 seconds
2 Wet track (the presenters claim this negatively affects track times by around 4 seconds)
3 Very wet track (the presenters claim this negatively affects track times by around 6 seconds)
4 Foggy conditions
5 Removed from board.
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,445
Based on that I suggest you buy a Koenigsegg CCX.

Although there do seem to be good condition Thema 8.32's around for 5-6k. That's not a lot of money for a lot of Ferrari engine.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom