Helstrom said:sojourner for eld imo. xD stun, nuke nuke nuke, fz, nuke nuke nuke nuke nuke rps. \o Might have added a few too many nukes.x<
Not if 3 svsg comes in with assist train and stuns uVoid959 said:I think warlord is preferable to banelord for most solo meleers, but every single grouper who can get banelord will do so, the first 60 sec of a fight will just turn into an interruptfest before any damage actually starts being done![]()
Danord_durin said:With ur dmg output, yeah u might have added a few to much![]()
Xxcalibur said:lots stealthers might quit if that happensjust imagine the amount of global dmg
![]()
ayeManisch Depressiv said:If a 3rd ML line per class comes into game it will prolly screw things up :/.
Banelord to heavy tanks or more hybrids could mean the end of of light tanks.
Can u see any chars in his sig that can stun and nuke eccept his eld?Zapsi said:Depends who.
-Hayfever- said:what 'bout mid casters?
Lorfo said:sojo to clerics, battlemaster to heretics
banelord to vw:s, banelord to bards,
banelord to thanes, warlord to zerks
One can only hope .. this darkage of castalot is fucking boring :<Phake said:anyways guess its back to tankalot ..![]()
So trueMeril said:One can only hope .. this darkage of castalot is fucking boring :<
Skaven said:I really don't see why they have to introduce a third line for people. imo it's fine as it is atm.
Meril said:One can only hope .. this darkage of castalot is fucking boring :<
Astoundingly true.Meril said:One can only hope .. this darkage of castalot is fucking boring :<
nah banelord for rm and sm me thinksThadius said:warlord for all 3, stormlord for bd