Jimmi said:You really are clueless aren't you? All albs on ml rush atm.
not ashamed of being an gol?Knolan said:lol makes me ashamed of being an alb... its not like we didnt have this comming, how dare you all whine about it.

Novac said:tbh cant say i like losing relics neither can i say i liked the ML rush. 240 albs was just too laggy for me and chain ld'ing. bg full 99% of time etc.. tho was nice to see what fancy dresses people had ! nice timing for RR mids. maybe albs take em back with true skillz !
Flimgoblin said:well it's quite sensible really![]()
but just as "lame" as taking a relic from guards at 5am - if there's no defenders there's no defenders.
The main difference here being the albs on the raid did have the option of suiciding out there, compared to the option of staying up late. (since the 5am raids were done by 2-3fg it wouldn't have taken too many mids staying up to push them back - any numbers on how many mids today?)
Both very different from 100 people logging in at 7am and steamrolling relics - since noone in the defending realm would know to login then and the few that would be online anyway wouldn't stand much chance.
Kagato said:Nicely pve'd
uke:

noaim said:I hope this doesnt mean that the nice stream of alb fg´s will fade tho.
Loonatik said:It's very easy to say Albs had the choice to come defend, but getting a new ML rush scheduled would probably mean weeks, or even months.
I'm pretty sure most Mids would have stayed with a ML raid in the same situation, and we would have the same complaints from them if Alb or Hib took he opportunity.
Anyways, grats Mids!
Mastade said:Albs dont deserve a single relic.. not now and especially not after cluster.. i'd rather see mids with 6 relics than albs... go pve more retard albs
Mastade said:Albs dont deserve a single relic.. not now and especially not after cluster.. i'd rather see mids with 6 relics than albs... go pve more retard albs

Jimmi said:You really are clueless aren't you? All albs on ml rush atm.