Prydwen 4tehwin!

[Artemls]

We not calling your sorc a FotM, just a realm hopper

 

[old.Atrox]

Originally posted by Artemls
Please not that nasty story again Xorta, we know you played with horses and got arrested.

FYI It was the Horses that played with me, not the otherway around.

 

[belth]

Oh the drama!

F'ing funny, jeje.

 

[klavrynd]

Originally posted by Xeanor
And fun how mids with their savages call me (an Alb, SORCERER) a fotm especially klavrynd, eh, mr. retired zerker-and-now-a-savage ?

played zerk from day one (clueless noobs can hardly be fotm)
and the savage was 36 before 1.61 was even on the drawing board

 

[eynar]

 

[Aussie-]

Originally posted by klavrynd
the savage was 36 before 1.61 was even on the drawing board

wow grats, you can read vn boards too ?

 

[klavrynd]

i can , yay me! :hat:

vnboards are such a realistic view on rvr, get an greycon animist to staffkill a tank and they make 70 nerfposts about it

 

[Qte Eth]

find it funny that excal albs think that pryd mids suck if they arent pwning albs every single fight wo chanses
Oo

mayb its smth with excal albs as 99% ppl say?

 

[Aussie-]

you're right Qte, having 1 r9 (thane) as highest rank after 1,5y daoc doesnt mean they suck

 

[Aussie-]

plz switch mid/pryd with mid/excal ?

 

[old.anubis]

what's wrong with thanes btw?

 

[Aussie-]

Originally posted by old.anubis
what's wrong with thanes btw?

no idea sir, have you checked your guild for r5 thanes?

 

[Qte Eth]

well mayb u did notice that prydwen has almost half RP then excalibur ~~ so rp isnt a good way to find out skill here sadly

or ur idea is since albs excal got shitloads of rp that makes em all suddenly good?~~ :lol:

 

[klavrynd]

rr = time spent, and nowadays hardly skill, sorry to burst your bubble

 

[)nick(]

Belgium :mgwhore: :kissit: :lol: :wall: :moon:

 

[Jenna.]

Originally posted by Aussie-
you're right Qte, having 1 r9 (thane) as highest rank after 1,5y daoc doesnt mean they suck

clues... clues... clues...

 

[old.Morchaoron]

Originally posted by Aussie-
you're right Qte, having 1 r9 (thane) as highest rank after 1,5y daoc doesnt mean they suck

somehow that sounds funny

 

[Mid_Blejsarus]

tbh a good mid group > all

And in rvr its more mids then albs yes, but infact most mids do run 1fg just its to little to kill most of the times and almost no hibbis thats why ppl roam mainly apk-amg. and with 3-4 groups doing like this its often hard not to get add, but many guilds do try avoid adding in fights.
With all realms all ras up, i would still say middi is the best.
Thats my opinion atleast.

Alb/Pryd got PE,FL, thats highly active in rvr thats good.
And also walkers new guild and sotl are oki just not as good as they use to be. Hibbi have Eclipse/NP thats both semi active.

Mid have thats active, BO,Warders,MM
And i would guess that abit lower ranked atleast in my view is
Forsete Circle,Maelstrom. But FC/Mael abit on hib/exc atm.

Fact remains its alot more active rvr ppl from mid/pryd the any of the other realms. And about RP, its like Qteeth said,
Compare the total amount of excal with prydwen. And then guess if prydwen ppl should have as high as some excal ppl have..

 

[Falcon]

Sorcs may not be uber still but claiming they're not, or at least weren't fotm is a bit silly. When I was playing my chanter (omfg fotm nerf lame!!!1111) I bumped into about 20 new Inconnu sorcs I'd never even heard of before in the space of a week - one of which was you Teador before I knew it was you, then there was like Shike's sorc, some sorc that ran with PE, another that ran with Pbuck and co. Was also Walker's sorc. Then plenty more random inconnu sorcs. FOTM? Yes, when you rolled yours Teador they sure as hell were, Uber now? No, people have realised they aint all that.

To be fair, not many seem to have stuck with the class though, so not really as fotm as they were about a month or two back.

 

[Xeanor]

Originally posted by Falcon
Sorcs may not be uber still but claiming they're not, or at least weren't fotm is a bit silly. When I was playing my chanter (omfg fotm nerf lame!!!1111) I bumped into about 20 new Inconnu sorcs I'd never even heard of before in the space of a week - one of which was you Teador before I knew it was you, then there was like Shike's sorc, some sorc that ran with PE, another that ran with Pbuck and co. Was also Walker's sorc. Then plenty more random inconnu sorcs. FOTM? Yes, when you rolled yours Teador they sure as hell were, Uber now? No, people have realised they aint all that.

To be fair, not many seem to have stuck with the class though, so not really as fotm as they were about a month or two back.

Nothing has changed to sorcs since then, everyone wanted to try as the class became a little bit more attractive (that's what the changes were for), but noone liked the changes and abandoned the char.

And there's 12 lvl 50 inconnu sorcerers on prydwen.

 

[kalgarn]

http://www.duskwave.com/daoc/characterrank.php?server=Prydwen&realm=&order=lastweek
lastweeks rp's top 10 all mid,such noobness imo

 

[Xeanor]

Originally posted by kalgarn
http://www.duskwave.com/daoc/characterrank.php?server=Prydwen&realm=&order=lastweek
lastweeks rp's top 10 all mid,such noobness imo

because albs usually don't have more than 2 sperate fg's in emain and mids have like 4-6 groups with a load of healers, makes life too hard.

if there were a lot of hibs they would have a load of em in the top 10, as the other realm makes less rps then (more hibs = more dead albs/mids)

 

[Medde]

savages needs r9 to pwn imo

 

[kalgarn]

so mids are getting 200k rp's a week from killing 2fg's of albs over and over with 6 fg's?stlong

 

[Xeanor]

Originally posted by kalgarn
so mids are getting 200k rp's a week from killing 2fg's of albs over and over with 6 fg's?stlong

not just 2fg, i'm just talking about the decent groups.

you know what i mean, but you don't want to agree.

 

[kalgarn]

Originally posted by Xeanor
not just 2fg, i'm just talking about the decent groups.

so you're saying that there are only 2 fg's of good playing albs and the rest are zerging noobs while mid has alot more skilled players?

Originally posted by Xeanor
you know what i mean, but you don't want to agree.

lies!!!11

 

[Xeanor]

Originally posted by kalgarn
so you're saying that there are only 2 fg's of good playing albs and the rest are zerging noobs while mid has alot more skilled players?

I'm saying there's only 2fg's of albs who are bothered to go emain and beat all the groups with savages

a random mids group is easy for a decent alb group, a mid group with 2-3 healers and savages is too hard for any random alb group, just because of the classes

 

[kalgarn]

pfft,now don't start from a post where you want to show that mid/pryd are noobs to a whine about how overpowered they are.

 

[Xeanor]

Originally posted by kalgarn
pfft,now don't start from a post where you want to show that mid/pryd are noobs to a whine about how overpowered they are.

rofl ?

 

[kalgarn]

:wub: