cHodAX said:Anyone else played the demo yet? Had about 30 mins on it so far and pretty impressed, the graphics are decent and the story seems solid enough, might actually be a game worth buying
nath said:Fps on consoles = bleh :\
TdC said:I dunno mate, I've seen (and played) FPS on consoles, and tbh every single one was extremely slowed down to give the players a chance against the bots / other players. Unless things have changed very much in recent times I don't think a console player would stand a chance against a pc player in a match.
Yaka said:quake4 runs shit on x360 as well, game is fun but levles/maps have the doom3/quake4 look to em
mank said:prey multiplayer gives me motion sickness :|
Nope, I'm quite comfortable using the pad for fps games, I just think it's lame.Aada said:Why? is it because you suck with the control pad? thats why most PC gamers hate console FPS, because they can't aim for shit with the control pad.
I adapted and now i don't suck with the control pad.. i remember first playing PDZ i couldn't hit the broad side of a fucking barn lmao.
JBP| said:Single player was quite enjoyable i thought, I'm not quite sure about multiplay though it seems something is missing but i don't know what.
KevinUK said:I think HL2 is far better, from where I got in the demo before quitting in boredom it was just aliens running at me in corridors. The map design in HL2 was far more interesting.
That and HL2 looks nicer and gives a much better frame rate.
TdC said:I run both maxed, and tbh the layout and textures of HL2 seem cleaner. Ofc the environments are totally different, but the prey demo seemed a little smudged and chaotic if such terms can be applied to it