Poll : Best rvr guild?

K

kr0n

Guest
No Blixt, it was mid tactic which was flawed. Exp fast so you get a nice advantage at start, then die to boredom when albs quit the game when youre too powerfull.
 
K

Krillin.

Guest
Originally posted by kr0n
No Blixt, it was mid tactic which was flawed. Exp fast so you get a nice advantage at start, then die to boredom when albs quit the game when youre too powerfull.

:clap: :clap: :clap:

kr0n is totally correct. Most albs wouldn't go near the amg in emain for being stomped by purple con middies.
 
B

Blixt Gordon

Guest
Nice tactic from the mids yes, exp. Albs should have tryed it. If it wasnt a tactic from sotl's and all albs side to exp so lol slow, then... lol again. But i truly belive it was, sotl is good players.

Takes no more then 10 days to reach level 50 from scratch. Just watch when pvsp opens for a example. What did it take the us players to reach 50? One week?
 
O

old.Chavez

Guest
You have got to be kidding.

Lvl'ing in Albion on patch 1.37 was a joke. There were only a few moderately good places and they were crowded.


/laugh
 
D

Danya

Guest
Somewhat easiler to level with spindel drops, in 1.36 we were all in grey/green equipment. :rolleyes:
 
B

Blixt Gordon

Guest
Ok. How can one alb ding 50 like a month before everyone else? Did he cheat? Did he haxx his way to Spindel? Or was he just better then the rest?

And yes, in MMORPG, and all games when you think of it, better also include playing more.
 
O

old.Chavez

Guest
No he didnt cheat, just online 24/7 :)

Lvling in albion and hibernia in the early days was still lame no matter wtf you say, really...
 
K

Krillin.

Guest
rar at only having mithra/keltoi and barrows itemized :p

can you say crowded in keltoi as well back then. Lucky if you found a mob to kill :)
 
K

kr0n

Guest
No Blixt, Soulfly had the same /played as the rest of us when we dinged 50. He just played lost and lost more, grped with the "best" and soloed alot.

Popular answer would be "Some of us have a life" but I aint using that. I just didnt see any need to be L50 as fast as possible and get bored earlier :/
 
O

old.Revz

Guest
Originally posted by Blixt Gordon
And btw, best rvsr guild by far is sotl. They must have the best tactic ever.

They exp and level so incredible slow that all good players in mid gets bored and leave server, then they ding 50 and starts to rvsr.

Now thats a real good tactic. :)

Pfft if only you knew :)
 
D

Derric

Guest
Servants of the Lake 15,472,885
63 active members


Warders of the 7th Sigil 8,825,429
75 active members

<waves to Blixt> :p
 
K

klavrynd

Guest
you don't need "uber"skills to get to 50
you only need time time time and nerves of steel

ps : did i mention you need alot of time?
 
J

Jenna.

Guest
Whats the definition on a active player? one that logon each month?
 
D

Danya

Guest
Good question, cos we sure as hell don't have 63. :p
 
O

old.XanateA

Guest
i hear SoTL suxx tho...
NP sux aswell, goddamnm noob guilds..
:|~~
 
B

Blixt Gordon

Guest
SOTL have 3 times as many active players as warder have tho. Those numbers is just alts and real members little brothers who plays with us as level 12 skalds and so on becasue we are kind enough to let them.

I have even seen screens of 6+ full groups sotl only. Warders have NEVER been more then 2 full groups online. Kinda enough said i think. :)

[And like stated, if sotl and the rest of the albs wouldnt have exped so.. normal.. 90% of the original warders(the true no life scumbag powergamer nerds from hell) would not have left the server and had been farmig their asses off then and atm instead :) ]
 
O

old.Pyrotechnix

Guest
Hmmm not bothering joining in this 'debate' just a little clarification for Blixt. SotL have NEVER had 48 people online at any time, i can guarantee you that. The average is about 20-25 at peak time rising to 35'ish if we have a special event planned.

Don't try to revive the old xp'ing debate, it was a fact that early on it was tougher to xp in Albion as compared to Midgard (no itemised dungeons blah blah blah). Like as has been said previously, if your early powergamers ruined the game for themselves then that was their problem ;) Take Sinister for example, he used to post how he'd never been beaten 1v1 and tried to come across as some highly skilled player. Once Albs actually got within 5 xp levels of him he started to look decidedly normal. After he came back from his break when albs were actually the same level he looked...ermm...well...dead mostly :p

Of the SotL online, we have a few hardcore 'emain'ers' who rack us up a lot of the guild rp's. I know you are trying to paint a picture of sotl being many times bigger than Warders but...sorry, not true. Enough said i think, :)

Regards,

Pyrotechnix
 
K

kr0n

Guest
Prolly aye. SotL average is over 20 so basically most are at work etc. Not saying I am tho :)
 
J

Jenna.

Guest
With active players he mean people who rvr alot :)
theres like 20 SotL in emain every evening :)
 
O

old.Revz

Guest
Originally posted by Blixt Gordon
SOTL have 3 times as many active players as warder have tho. Those numbers is just alts and real members little brothers who plays with us as level 12 skalds and so on becasue we are kind enough to let them.

You think you are the only guild with members who have more than one account and hence count twice even though they can never properly be played at the same time? You think you are the only guild with members who are friends that don't play a great deal?

The statistics don't lie regardless of how you try to portray it, Warders have more active accounts than SotL : 75 to 64 as of the most recent update. Pretty weak to blame your little brothers for bumping up the numbers.

Originally posted by Blixt Gordon
I have even seen screens of 6+ full groups sotl only.

Show me those screenshots then because you are either lying or can't count. I personally took the screenshot of the most SotL online and in one place. Unless you think you know more about our guild than the me who has been GM since beta you might want to think again.

It is a bit of a shame we are having to look to Excalibur for a RP challenge worth beating. I don't see Nolby Pride's total and try to belittle it by saying our members have gone inactive, quit out of boredom or simply not been there and we have got where we are with fewer than we did.

As for the exp thing, maybe our method worked better than yours?
 
S

SoulFly Amarok

Guest
Originally posted by kr0n
No Blixt, Soulfly had the same /played as the rest of us when we dinged 50. He just played lost and lost more, grped with the "best" and soloed alot.

Popular answer would be "Some of us have a life" but I aint using that. I just didnt see any need to be L50 as fast as possible and get bored earlier :/

I started the game 4 days after when the european servers opened. I took my computer to eleasias' place, and made a highlander fighter. That's where the story of soulfly, the first level 50 character on pryd/alb begins.

I played loads and loads. Met loads of new people and got many new friends (many of them have quit..).

I was around 43~ish when I joined SotL, as they were reforming, so I tried my luck, and here I am, PvE'ing :uhoh:

You really do not want to know how much time I spent online getting some equipment and exp. The people who were around those days remember :e

My played was lots when I made that 50 :| 30+ days.

What comes to "having a life?" No, I don't have one :whip:
and play the game for PvE, not pvp..as you can see from my rp's..
:mad:

Trying to replace pve with pvp, but doesn't look that good.

-tincantankitamkthx.
 
J

Jenna.

Guest
yeah, you and your little guild are so uber revz! :sleeping: :)

75 acc. vs 64 acc.

Warders have 48 lvl 45+ characters
SotL have 67 lvl 45+ characters

SotL have 77 chars between 44 and 1
Warders have 104 chars between 44 and 1

Checking your homepage...

"This evening Servants of the Lake and Lords of England took 4 groups each of their finest warriors and did battle with Legion in the depths of Darkness Falls."

Warders have ~1 team at legionraids.

Checking some SS on your page also. Can count 20+ SotL on serveral SS.

About its a shame youre the top RP-holder. Why is that a shame? Has there ever been any guild that has been close to you? Maybe EoO but they are like 2325353 members. FYI, Warders has been one of the smallest (in numbers) guilds in Midgard until we realised that we were gonna self-die unless we did some merging. During the summer we had maybe 5 guildies max online on the evenings. It wasnt a rare sight that /gc who showed no matches at all. But its a real shame, yeah... I agree...

xxx sends, are you a spy?
 
W

walkerb

Guest
Originally posted by Jenna.
yeah, you and your little guild are so uber revz! :sleeping: :)

75 acc. vs 64 acc.

Warders have 48 lvl 45+ characters
SotL have 67 lvl 45+ characters

SotL have 77 chars between 44 and 1
Warders have 104 chars between 44 and 1

Checking your homepage...

"This evening Servants of the Lake and Lords of England took 4 groups each of their finest warriors and did battle with Legion in the depths of Darkness Falls."

Warders have ~1 team at legionraids.

Checking some SS on your page also. Can count 20+ SotL on serveral SS.

About its a shame youre the top RP-holder. Why is that a shame? Has there ever been any guild that has been close to you? Maybe EoO but they are like 2325353 members. FYI, Warders has been one of the smallest (in numbers) guilds in Midgard until we realised that we were gonna self-die unless we did some merging. During the summer we had maybe 5 guildies max online on the evenings. It wasnt a rare sight that /gc who showed no matches at all. But its a real shame, yeah... I agree...

xxx sends, are you a spy?

pre planned PVE events we can get those amounts of ppl online
but rarly more than 1-2group rvring
 
O

old.Revz

Guest
Originally posted by Jenna.
yeah, you and your little guild are so uber revz! :sleeping: :)

And don't you know it.

Originally posted by Jenna.
Stuff about members and RP...

I await the screens of 6+ full groups of SotL as Blixt promised.

Other than that we can say whatever we want about members, their levels and how active they are but the stat people see is the "active members" number on the Herald.
 
B

Blixt Gordon

Guest
Ok. 6 groups was just my estimation of the numbers. Lucky enough you all was extremly offended by this horrible misstake and notified me that 6 groups was incredible way off.

There was in fact -only- 5 full groups. Thats 3 more groups then warders ever had, even if a event is planned for weeks, but still sotl have -only- 5 full groups when they raid. Im so very sorry for saying sotl have 6 groups when its -only- 5 groups. Please forgive me.

http://www.servantsofthelake.org/images/fullpics/news/sotlteam.jpg

All guilds have the same numbers of alts or people who are members just for fun? All guilds have rules as for example, max 1 alt per member? Ok.

I seriously thought sotl could take me little comment before with a wink in the eye, or something. But the subject seems to be very thouchy still, or there is simply a lack of humor. And yes, the "powergamers" in warders and all of mid destroyed the game by playing it to well, that sounds about right.

Take care and exp well.
 
O

old.Revz

Guest
Stop making out we suck, our ego's are fragile :mad:
 
I

ivan_tribbiani

Guest
Blixt ---> Lighten up matey :)

Gideon ---> Being a little more selfcentered can help you with your ego problems ;)

Jenna ---> You have earned the right to see my AK :)

Sickofit ---> you cant see my AK :m00:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom