Wij
I am a FH squatter
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2003
- Messages
- 18,404
xane said:You can argue that Health and Education of (poorer) working people ultimately benefit the (richer) ones who employ them. It makes sense to have a healthy and smart workforce, if the government did not provide it then the employer probably would.
This is a known phenomena, during the throes of expansion and colonialism, and even more during the industrial revolution, private companies would frequently provide schooling and doctors to their employees, and in even the most capitalist economies today, like America, there is government provided healthcare and education.
Although "the poor" may be the _direct_ consumer of state health and education, it is everyone, and more specifically the industry proprietors and investors, who ultimately benefit. It makes sense because it makes money
In a swift attempt to turn the thread back on course, it is in fact matters such as health and education in America that are more likely to determine Bush's success in the election, not his foreign policy, and there has been a huge health "scandal" over Medicare in recent months.
I never said education didn't benefit the economy as a whole, and therefore indirectly, the rich business folk. It does benefit the direct consumers quite nicely too. Education brings bigger wages people !
Sod the on-topic police.