Outlaw's GRP

[Claudius]

If the alb zerg only occured "sometimes" aswell, i dont think it would be half the bitching of what it is now tbh.

Then all that will be left on FH will be albs whining over overpowered hibs and mids! Make FH more interesting, make more alb zergs!

 

[Bracken]

The Hib Zerg is the Result of the Alb Zerg. Hibs dont Zerg if there is no need to do so.

ROFLMFAO absolutely beautiful. Lost count of the number of times we've set out as 1fg and been met by 4fg+ hibs at amg, even in Odin's when there have only been 1 or 2fg albs in total. Amazing that you keep repeating this as if it's true, just like you actually believe the majority of albs want to leave atk with unbalanced groups. Even funnier when people who try take some sort of 1fg high moral ground like yourself wipe our fg with over 2fg. But guess it was the albs who made you do it, right?

 

[Bracken]

If the alb zerg only occured "sometimes" aswell, i dont think it would be half the bitching of what it is now tbh.
....+ Albs seem to count 3 fg hibs as a zerg, while hibs count 3-4 fg albs as a small zerg.

So define "sometimes". Come on, enlighten us. How many times, in your esteemed opinion, is it acceptable to zerg? Perhaps all the people who choose to go rvr in emain each night could have a rota, so that they can't be accused of zerging more than "sometimes"? Or maybe after 40 people have ported to emain all the rest should log, because they might be put on the zergers blacklist? And as for the definition of zerg or small zerg, it just gets better and better. So 3fg hibs is acceptable, particularly if everyone else is running as fg (hi Odins hibs)? Running over a soloer as a fg isnt zerging them? Not only are you the judge for defining the amount of zerging allowed, you also grace us with your definition of a zerg. Perhaps you could provide us with a full written guide on all your definitions, so that we remain socially acceptable as we rvr? Or maybe, just maybe, you should stop crying like a baby and just play?

 

[Chronictank]

Sounds like a fun project tbh. but maybe best suited for Odins ?
If you get the odds on your side i think you can be w (very?) hard to meet
edited for spelling

We normally have a fg in odins be nice to duel u fg v fg so long as the 10fg adds dont follow
wont be there all this week tho jacinas xp grps and ml's

btw i steamroll soloers cus i havent yet met one that doesnt add on a fg vs fg fight, they day i do i will use realm lore and leave them alone

 

[Neo]

So define "sometimes". Come on, enlighten us. How many times, in your esteemed opinion, is it acceptable to zerg? Perhaps all the people who choose to go rvr in emain each night could have a rota, so that they can't be accused of zerging more than "sometimes"? Or maybe after 40 people have ported to emain all the rest should log, because they might be put on the zergers blacklist? And as for the definition of zerg or small zerg, it just gets better and better. So 3fg hibs is acceptable, particularly if everyone else is running as fg (hi Odins hibs)? Running over a soloer as a fg isnt zerging them? Not only are you the judge for defining the amount of zerging allowed, you also grace us with your definition of a zerg. Perhaps you could provide us with a full written guide on all your definitions, so that we remain socially acceptable as we rvr? Or maybe, just maybe, you should stop crying like a baby and just play?

Read my post once again... slooooow.. I said there would be less bitching if albs didnt "zerg" as often as they do. As of the fgs bit, i was refering to yesterday when 3 fgs hibs where attacking the zerg and albs called that a zerg. And in hib 3-4 albs are acually called a "small zerg"...... as far as i remember i didnt cry/set any rules/or say how many grp u were allowed to run.

 

[Clipse]

If anyone knows how to define a Zerg, TD would deffo be the experts.

NEo what do u think of these definitions,

we are Reactive Zergers - Zerg for revenge of being zerged.
you are Proactive zergers - you zerg coz u sook.

 

[Neo]

If anyone knows how to define a Zerg, TD would deffo be the experts.

Cant comment on that since ive only been in TD for 3 weeks, but during this time, we have only runned 2 fgs once. And that was yesterday, "cuz of" the alb zerg. Otherwise i havent seen any "Zerg tendences" in TD so far. just a nice bunch of PvE Happy guys

we are Reactive Zergers - Zerg for revenge of being zerged.you are Proactive zergers - you zerg coz u sook.

Sounds good imo (as long as "you are" aint refereing to hibs)

 

[Novamir]

we are Reactive Zergers - Zerg for revenge of being zerged.
you are Proactive zergers - you zerg coz u sook.

roooooofl

you die to 1fg, then you come back with 2fg. seen it sooo many times since the beginning of excal Zoy, dont even try to deny it.

 

[Clipse]

wtf is this double post! !!

 

[Clipse]

Nouv You honestly think we r as shallow as that ?

Name me one time we lost to you as a fg vs fg, then came back as 2fg .....

It's no biggie, but the last meeting I recollect, we beat you fg vs fg. Tbh everytime we met u this past weak, we beat u fg vs fg.

 

[Clipse]

I don't wanna discuss this anymore with u guys, its a no-win situation. DO what you gotto do to survive.

Zoy out.

 

[Gregorian]

why exactly u bother zoy?
u cant be that bored

aliorm is right, icenoober is right and of c krane the almighty is right.
u on the other hand, u just suck - stop livin in denial man :wub:

 

[Edaemos]

Cant comment on that since ive only been in TD for 3 weeks, but during this time, we have only runned 2 fgs once. And that was yesterday, "cuz of" the alb zerg. Otherwise i havent seen any "Zerg tendences" in TD so far. just a nice bunch of PvE Happy guys



Sounds good imo (as long as "you are" aint refereing to hibs)

Last week saw TD running 2fg for several hours 2 nights in a row, they were continously running amg<>atk. Eventually albs got bored of dying and zerged them, until then i only saw 1fg's of albs leaving atk, but i guess after a few deaths to 2fg outside your own portal keep people get frustrated.

 

[Asty]

If anyone knows how to define a Zerg, TD would deffo be the experts.

lol.. TD's zerg is pretty rare tbh, and its like 3fgs whereas YOU zerg every single day with 5-6fg so STFU please.

we are Reactive Zergers - Zerg for revenge of being zerged.
you are Proactive zergers - you zerg coz u sook.

lol again, you maybe try to move as 1fg once per day but as you suck so much you get owned by a fg fast and then the usual evening zerg starts.

 

[Clipse]

Black Company

 

[Asty]

Black Company

Point being?

 

[Tootz]

Haha, this made me laugh So to albs, the definition of "fun" is wtfpwn 1fg or 2fg's with 6fg?

Wow, you've managed to get completely the wrong idea from what I said, its quite impressive. If you actually read my post closely, something that can be tricky for some people on here I know, you'll see that all I said was some people prefer to head out into emain with whatever group setup they can get, and not wait around the TK for ages trying to put together that "perfect group". How this gets translated into playing as a 6fg zerg is only known to you.

More priceless stuff, hm where to begin... oh yeah: "every realm zergs"... this is only true if the definition of "zergs" is "have sometimes/does sometimes zerg". If the definition is "zergs on a common basis" it is true only of Albion on this server, and you know it.

That stuff you're shovelling really is starting to smell. How you can honestly say, with your hand on your heart, that Albion is the ONLY realm that zergs on a regular basis? Either you're playing on a different server, or you play with your hands over your eyes all the time.

And isn't it funny how people interpret (and uses to their zerg defence) the term "Massively Multiplayer Online RPG"?

- Random mid/hib: "hey, you albs zerg way too much!"
- Random alb: "wtf you on about, it's a zerg vs zerg game, look, they even called it a Massively Multiplayer game, that means that all people who are logged on in one realm should make one Full Group and go Emain, ffs!"

Like it or not, this IS a MMORPG. Its not Counter-Strike with just 8 vs 8 people, something you're probably used to. Its a game for 1000s of players to interact with each other, whether its by questing, exping, or RvRing - hell it even says so on the box. This is what Mythic envisaged when they made this game. They did not make it just so you could go around in your fotm gank group and farm RPs from low RR albs as they filter out of the ATK in twos and threes.

Then why do u go emain if u aint wanna "wtfpwn" anything ? Isnt winning fun ?

If I only played this game to win, I'd have re-rolled Mid or Hib years ago As it stands, I win some, and I lose some - but the fun for me is in the fighting, not what my RP bar says at the end of the night.

 

[Novamir]

zoy thats crap, the only 8 vs. 8 fight i've had with u recently was yesterday (2pm ish, Levian Ridge- herbal will remember t coz we tallked in irc) - which we won. ive lost to you as 16 vs. 8 many times since the start, but i wont resort to running in 2fg (unless theres 100 albs in emain) because it feels crap when u roll over 1fg in 2fg, and its harder to organise, harder to know whats going on etc.

im not denying ive been in a grp thats lost to u 8v8 before (tho i cant remember it), but ive been rolled over by your 2fg+ in 1fg SOO many times since the start of excal.

 

[Clipse]

oO yesterday, grannies, 5:30 ish, fg vs fg, that was us m8

 

[Clipse]

Point being?

U tell me.......

Anyway im gone, bye.

 

[Ghaladriel]

 

[ShivaW]

lol.. TD's zerg is pretty rare tbh, and its like 3fgs whereas YOU zerg every single day with 5-6fg so STFU please.



lol again, you maybe try to move as 1fg once per day but as you suck so much you get owned by a fg fast and then the usual evening zerg starts.

hahaha, BC didnt run 2 fg in emain last week all the night........ uke:

 

[ShivaW]

oh sorry, wasnt only last week

 

[Bracken]

Read my post once again... slooooow.. I said there would be less bitching if albs didnt "zerg" as often as they do. .

Um yep... So again...how often is it acceptable to zerg, in your humble opinion? We already have that its acceptable to zerg "sometimes" (love that one), so in order for us to have "less bitching" what's the zerg quota? Somehow I dont think that old chestnut would ever stop...

As of the fgs bit, i was refering to yesterday when 3 fgs hibs where attacking the zerg and albs called that a zerg. And in hib 3-4 albs are acually called a "small zerg"...... as far as i remember i didnt cry/set any rules/or say how many grp u were allowed to run.

Ah right, so on one night some albs accused you of zerging when you were 3fg... Well if they met you when they were 1fg in Odins I'd pretty much agree with them. So its about definitions.

And your "bitching" as you call it in this thread just seems like crying to me.

/shrug

 

[Asty]

hahaha, BC didnt run 2 fg in emain last week all the night........ uke:

I've played every night last week and we have had 2 groups out yes, but we dont run together.

Even IF we ran as 2fg you still wouldn't have anything to say mr. 6fg noob.

 

[Aliorm]

I think i can say i never lossed fg vs fg with GoL, only times when they running with 2-3 wizards and they used VP.

Yesterday we killed GoL at Tower and amg, then we came back to emain, and near to bolg we found 2 fg's GoL at wall, where around 4 wizzards in, and they used VP ofc....

Shivaw: ofc i always leech, but with brain. I dont go mode crazy to do pbaoe just from behind debuffing and DDing I remember a day when my bard used Egg at amg, my grp was dead but bard and Zoyster came using MoC trying to kill us, he doesnt know we have inmunite time and stun?

 

[Clipse]

dont speak to a lady like that

 

[Clipse]

I think i can say i never lossed fg vs fg with GoL, only times when they running with 2-3 wizards and they used VP.

Yesterday we killed GoL at Tower and amg, then we came back to emain, and near to bolg we found 2 fg's GoL at wall, where around 4 wizzards in, and they used VP ofc....

Shivaw: ofc i always leech, but with brain. I dont go mode crazy to do pbaoe just from behind debuffing and DDing I remember a day when my bard used Egg at amg, my grp was dead but bard and Zoyster came using MoC trying to kill us, he doesnt know we have inmunite time and stun?

We never got beat by Gol, unles they use VP rofl.

btw Egg ress gives no immunity...

 

[ShivaW]

I've played every night last week and we have had 2 groups out yes, but we dont run together.

Even IF we ran as 2fg you still wouldn't have anything to say mr. 6fg noob.

so why you QQ about our 2 fg? isnt our problem if other alb decide follow we

after all if you want say we are 6fg noob, you are 6fg noob too, when other mid follow you

dont QQ about zerg, if you maked zerg too

 

[ShivaW]

he doesnt know we have inmunite time and stun?

uhm.......