+1:kissit:Gear said:If we have no stealth days I won't get QQ threads*![]()
*locked ones
+1:kissit:Gear said:If we have no stealth days I won't get QQ threads*![]()
Vodkafairy said:you're one to talk with your playstyle, putting dd traps at brynja with aggro ml9 convoker bd pet.
/shrug. stealthers give good fights, animists that spam shrooms don't. give more stealthers.
charmangle said:I understand the fun in playing stealther vs stealther but for low defence classes the invisability + high damage just destroy the game. Best way to deal with this now would probably be to remove the ability for stealthers to actually attack from stealth mode..
Gilbride said:Or get a group! No wait, sorry, terrible idea, that visible classes would actually group.. that would require.. people.. and stuff.
Gilbride said:I'm not saying only stealthers should solo, I'm saying if you can't hack it solo as a visi-class, then realize your limitations, and either start pushing at them or go do something you might be better at. As my flatmate would say, "why play an MMORPG if you're out there to play by yourself?".. But then, I don't entirely agree with his point of view on this, so rather.. see above answer.
Oh and please, 80% of the people who care to solo are not visible classes ;o Most actually enjoy the group-game in one way or another. Leave stealthers be IMO, it's not like they're gonna disappear from DAoC anyway.
charmangle said:They will always ruin the game for the majority to please the minority...
Gilbride said:actually, simply pointing out that stealthers are(or atleast were, pre-stealthzerg) the majority of the consistently soloing crowd. furthermore, alot of players have a stealther of some sort, a large part of them even lvl 50 alt-stealthers, or mains. it would pretty much be impossible for Mythic to remove stealth.
here however.. you see, since stealthers are the majority of the consistently soloing crowd, they're not ruining the game for the majority, but rather the minority of people who don't want to group, yet want to play visible classes. and on top of that, they have to not be good enough to hack it vs stealthers. this is obviously accounting for RAs, MLs and whatever other abilities you can come to think of, so not being good enough is certainly not all about someone being a poor player.
charmangle said:The majority of players are in my opinion random players that go out when it fits them. They dont play for more than a couple of hours and dont think its worth the effort to try and find others to group with to much. These are the players that mostly show up when its Irvr and serg or siege etc. Now in my opinion they make up a huge majority of the daoc-account crowd. And its mainly from their perspecitive Im arguing atm.
charmangle said:Hmm...so you are saying that the only class in the game that should solo is classes with stealth ?
Why not just remove stealth so that ALL could solo if they wanted to ?
Point here beeing that stealth makes you able to choose your time to attack visable classes, this allows you a horrible advantage that can only be negated with huuuge drawbacks in damage etc.
So with your argument...remove stealth from the 20% of the players that play stealthers so that 80% of the players that play all other classes can actually have fun solo too...
/Charmangle
Farbaute2 said:a "no nuke" day would be more politically correct