haarewin
Fledgling Freddie
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2004
- Messages
- 2,756
Trem said:This may just be me, but, am I the only one thinking this has something to do with us getting the Olympics?
not just you. my brother instantly blamed the french.
Trem said:This may just be me, but, am I the only one thinking this has something to do with us getting the Olympics?
Deadmanwalking said:Hardly, if they wanted anything to do with the Olympics, yesterday would have been it.
Trafalgar square anyone?
Stratford?
No, this was planned months ago. G8.
Trem said:This may just be me, but, am I the only one thinking this has something to do with us getting the Olympics?
Paradroid said:I'll admit that this could well be a handful of UK born (or immigrant) radical nutjobs, who foolishly believe that they can make a difference - or, more probably, it's an act of revenge. But, ffs, anyone with two brain cells to rub together can see it's only hampered their collective efforts - are "terrorists" that stupid?
Kind RegardsProfessor Conor Gearty said:The attacks today are as expected as they are deplorable. The wanton destruction of human life has no rational purpose. It is an expression of anger not of political ambition, a demand that Londoners suffer merely because others suffer, or are assumed to be suffering. The violation of human rights is all the more complete because innocent people are being used as instruments of another person's rage - the ultimate abuse of human rights is to turn people into objects and this is what those responsible for this violence have done, both literally and metaphorically.
The rage of those responsible for these acts is also a rage of impotence, a scream for attention which functions as a bloody substitute for action. Difficult though it is at this moment, we must remember that these violent deeds are the actions of very weak people: weak morally, weak personally but also weak politically. Far from being frightening because they are strong, the perpetrators of these acts are frightening precisely because they are weak. We must remember this and not give them the victory their violence craves: the victory of a changed London, one in which freedom of movements is inhibited, unnecessary surveillance is rife and civil liberties and human rights are further truncated. That would be their victory. To deny them it we need now to keep our heads […]
Britain has suffered sever levels of subversive violence in the past and come through unscathed. It will take more than irrational anger of weak killers to disconcert the tolerant, diverse, hard-working multi-cultural community that makes London not only an Olympic city but also the greatest urban metropolis on earth.
I don't mean to piss on your campfire here, but the attacks were recoverd from so quickly because they were pretty minor in comparison to something like the september 11th attacks on New York, which took considerably longer to clear up.PLightstar said:Mind you, I was very impressed in the way the services dealt with the after effects, I think it was one of the most efficient things this country has ever done. At least it shows these 'terriosts' that we can't be stopped and will be able to deal with anything they chuck at us. London is pretty much back up to running speed again. (execpt for the crime scenes)

Chilly said:London's hospitals can absorb that many casualties without TOO much bother, though. But throw 10,000 injured/dead/whatever at the london hospital system and it would definately feel the strain and people would lose their lives due to lack of resources.
Tom said:Chilly is correct, hospitals have a maximum capacity - exceed that capacity and people will die.
Zill said:I thought the Queen made a very moving, dignified speech as she visited the wounded in a hospital. Cant believe the ole girl's 80 years old.