McCartney divorce settlement

[old.Tohtori]

Well EQ, one could ask you the same. Why eat choccies, have a car, not live on rent, eat this, do that, when you could save that money and send it to africa or some such?

Just because someone has more money, they are not obliged to give it away in more amounts.

None if us forum dwelling "commoners" could even make enough money to donate as much as they do, so how about, appreciate that they do in the first place?

 

[Eeben]

i dont see why you have to pay your x wife more money just because your rich ? why should you pay for their expensive things? dont really think thats fair.

 

[old.Tohtori]

i dont see why you have to pay your x wife more money just because your rich ? why should you pay for their expensive things? dont really think thats fair.

That's not the point, he pays his ex-wife money as he would if he weren't rich.

The sum is rather ridiculously small compared to some alimony settlements people get.

First people say "rich/famous get away with everything!" and when they get treated equally, people say "he shouldn't pay that".

Same was on the subway, other people were complaining a while back when they didn't announce in detail what a problem is in the subway holdup. The other day, they complained about hearing in detail what the problem is. F*cking compaliners the lot.

 

[Eeben]

That's not the point, he pays his ex-wife money as he would if he weren't rich.

.

he wouldnt have payed 24 milion £ if he wasnt rich. I just dont see why he has to pay for her expensive life style wich he is now. why should she get more then if some random guy devorces from he's wife?

 

[old.Tohtori]

he wouldnt have payed 24 milion £ if he wasnt rich. I just dont see why he has to pay for her expensive life style wich he is now. why should she get more then if some random guy devorces from he's wife?

Well you have to set the alimony/settlement payment accordingly. You can't have a strict "set in stone" payment for this.

If you have 50 bucks on your account, you can't pay 2 million.
And if you have 2 million, paying 50 bucks isn't really fair either.

Especialyl since there's a-hole husbands.

They were heard and the judge ruled, the payment is pennies compared to his fortune.

 

[Ezteq]

Well EQ, one could ask you the same. Why eat choccies, have a car, not live on rent, eat this, do that, when you could save that money and send it to africa or some such?

Just because someone has more money, they are not obliged to give it away in more amounts.

None if us forum dwelling "commoners" could even make enough money to donate as much as they do, so how about, appreciate that they do in the first place?

actually i do give what i can every month via direct debit to my chosen charities but thats a good point you raised and if i was the one on TV every sodding hour of the day blathering about how desperate they are and how they need the money, then i went and brought a batch of ivory toilet brush holders and cried about only getting 79 million and that i would have to fly less than first class, i think that puts it in to perspective


what i was trying to point out is that they go on about how awful poverty is then they kick up a right old fuss when *shockity shock shock* they have one luxury that might possibly not be paid for by someone else (she actually has plenty of her own money).

i just hate the way "celebrities" waist money, take catherine zita jones and michael "im still hanging in there baby" douglas and their court case against hello, 2 massively wealthy organisations fighting eachother for the ever important More Money.

i also hate wedgies, that itch you get right in the centre of your ear and you can only scratch it by making a weird throat noise, when you make The Perfect Sadwich and then drop it, noisy neighbours and soap operas but theres bugger all i can do about anything aside from moan about it on FHOT.

 

[old.Tohtori]

actually i do give what i can every month via direct debit to my chosen charities but thats a good point you raised and if i was the one on TV every sodding hour of the day blathering about how desperate they are and how they need the money, then i went and brought a batch of ivory toilet brush holders and cried about only getting 79 million and that i would have to fly less than first class, i think that puts it in to perspective


what i was trying to point out is that they go on about how awful poverty is then they kick up a right old fuss when *shockity shock shock* they have one luxury that might possibly not be paid for by someone else (she actually has plenty of her own money).

i just hate the way "celebrities" waist money, take catherine zita jones and michael "im still hanging in there baby" douglas and their court case against hello, 2 massively wealthy organisations fighting eachother for the ever important More Money.

Exactly EQ my lovely redheaded pervert. Put it in perspective, to us, the ivory crapperlids are "expensive", put to them, they are simply crapper lids.

You have to think of everything in % manner, to really see how it relates to wealth. But also take into consideration, that a million is still a million.

Hard to explain.

That woman, by giving to charity, has most likely given more then we ever can. Good thing yes? Be happy about it, don't moan about her having more money to give. As you could always give mroe, and more and mroe, and oops...you're the charity case.

And also i just had to comment on the "not giving away certain level of living for charity", when, you're not giving up your ways either *grin*

 

[Ctuchik]

i dont see why you have to pay your x wife more money just because your rich ? why should you pay for their expensive things? dont really think thats fair.

its a fucked up law in the US and have nothing to do with how much money you have. if u marry someone thats more wealthy then you, get used to the lifestyle that comes with it theres aparently a law that says that u have a right to keep that lifestyle after a divorce.. or something long those lines....

and then it doesen't matter if there BOTH ritch as hell to begin with if i understood it right.


but it doesn't really matter. he could afford 10 times that cash np at all. so its not like she's scraping him clean or something.

 

[Dukat]

i also hate wedgies, that itch you get right in the centre of your ear and you can only scratch it by making a weird throat noise, when you make The Perfect Sadwich and then drop it, noisy neighbours and soap operas but theres bugger all i can do about anything aside from moan about it on FHOT.

1. Go commando!
2. Use a pipe-cleaning brush!
3. Eat it anyway!
4. Kill them!
5. Kill the TV! Then the actors!!

Job done!

 

[Calaen]

Any charity that uses that psycho whore as a patron will stop receiving donations. She is a thieving cow.

Did you see her rant after the case? She wasnt meant to say anything yet she tells us how she is only getting 35k a year for her 4 year old daughter and that because of this her daughter will have to fly economy class instead of first class like her father. She is a fucking leech.

 

[Guest]

All these people making jokes about her, I for one think its just prosthetic

 

[Binky the Bomb]

All these people making jokes about her, I for one think its just prosthetic

Horrible, horrible joke... nice one.

 

[Hawkwind]

Poor Heather because she only got 24.3 mil she can not afford to send her daughter on first class flights anymore. They cost 17k a time and she flys 5 times a year. Paul is such a cold hearted bastard!

That's BS. I've flown First Class on a company ticket to Hong Kong from UK and was only about 8K. Where the fuck is she flying to, the moon?

 

[Binky the Bomb]

That's BS. I've flown First Class on a company ticket to Hong Kong from UK and was only about 8K. Where the fuck is she flying to, the moon?

A magical land, were she's immune to critisism and has some sort of credability. She could get the same effect from therapy and anti-depressants on the NHS.

 

[Sharma]

I hope she dies in a crash or something.

End of fucking story, stupid cow.

 

[old.Tohtori]

I hope she dies in a crash or something.

End of fucking story, stupid cow.

I have to ask this once again. Why?

For being an ex-wife getting cash?

 

[Guest]

she has been slated by the press from the day they separated, thats why, don't believe everything you read, you don't actually know this person, just what you see reported or written about her.

 

[tris-]

can you really trust someone with only one leg?

 

[Sharma]

I have to ask this once again. Why?

For being an ex-wife getting cash?

Not up for debating this one sorry.

I'm not playing up the devils advocate, she's repeatedly fucked over a good man and tried to tarnish his reputation.

I hope you never get caught up in a divorce - otherwise you'd see why I harbour such ire toward gold digging fucks like her.

 

[Sharma]

she has been slated by the press from the day they separated, thats why, don't believe everything you read, you don't actually know this person, just what you see reported or written about her.

Yes and she's been blatently honest in all her TV interviews too.

What a load of fucking crap.

 

[old.Tohtori]

Have to point out, I simply don't know f*ck all about the "fame" of these two.(except for obvious)

If it's "based on press and such", then i'm not up for debating it either. If i don't know the woman or about their relationship, how good a husband(if any) he was etc, i'm not gonna discuss about it.

I don't really trust media, good or bad, when it comes to "judging" someone.

I hope you never get caught up in a divorce - otherwise you'd see why I harbour such ire toward gold digging fucks like her.

Well, wasn't that nice. First off, that sounds like "every divorce has gold diggers in it" and secondly, it sounded like i'm incapable of understanding divorce or golddiggers based on my own experience. If it wasn't meant as such, then no fault, otherwise, up yours.

 

[chipper]

personally i cant believe shes moaning at gettin only 24 mil for HERSELF! what a selfish greedy cow she did nothing to earn she should be happy at whatever she got.

 

[Sharma]

I don't really trust media, good or bad, when it comes to "judging" someone.



Well, wasn't that nice. First off, that sounds like "every divorce has gold diggers in it" and secondly, it sounded like i'm incapable of understanding divorce or golddiggers based on my own experience. If it wasn't meant as such, then no fault, otherwise, up yours.

Check out her interviews - some of which she wasn't even quizzed about Macca at all and she suddenly flies into a rage over him in repeated attempts.

Also I wasn't implying that either, it's just quite large stacked in the womans favour in every single case - The ease of a woman being able to completely turn a mans life upside down with a divorce is relatively easy since for some reason (most likely due to the feminist morons) the womans word is far stronger than the mans, so far I haven't really seen many divorce settlements where the bloke has came out on top (Realistically Macca hasn't either).

Anyone who says "Divorces are always 50%" is living in coocoo fucking lala land and must obviously be on the mega happy pills since divorces simply put - screw the man over and over again.

Generally results in the 50% assets split and the bloke serving up anywhere up to a 3rd of his yearly wage to the woman (some of its for the kids but other part is largely financial support for her) AND the woman most of the time gets near full custody of the kids, my parents one was particularly nasty since my mum was campaigning for 100%, my bro and sis never had a say about who they wanted to go with and I got pretty much told by the court that I didn't either (despite being old enough to make my own mind up LEGALLY).

Granted the cover of this story might not be massive in Finland mate, but if you can't see Heather Mills as anything more than a gold digger then you are very VERY blind to an obvious spinster.


I argued anyway, sue me.

 

[old.Tohtori]

Didn't really argue, well, as such, more sounded like you just generalized and bashed down women in/for divorces.

That's one helluva generalization dude. There are golddiggers, but the rest is there to ensure a good life and financial support for A: woman who is left on nothing. or B: Kids. That's a good thing, otherwise, men could go and hump away and the woman HAD to stay in the relationship. It's been used before, doesn't work.

Not to mention, most divorces are the husbands fault. If you want to generalize, but i do say MOST, not all, most. As in, more then 50%.


About: "Granted the cover of this story might not be massive in Finland mate, but if you can't see Heather Mills as anything more than a gold digger then you are very VERY blind to an obvious spinster."

Again, tempted to say "piss off", or some other form like that, but to me it looks like a 4 year marriage down the drain and a classic settlement/child support thing. As i said, I know NOTHING of this, in the media segment, so don't call on me being blind.


Also, about watching her interviews, what would one interview change? My opinion of her wouldn't change, my opinion on why the marriage failed won't change, as it's not discussed in an unbiased manner and i can't ask the participants really.

 

[Sharma]

Also, about watching her interviews, what would one interview change? My opinion of her wouldn't change, my opinion on why the marriage failed won't change, as it's not discussed in an unbiased manner and i can't ask the participants really.

That's very true.

However, the reason why I said to watch the interview was to watch her mannerisms - Granted I don't know the full story behind all of it but the way she acts and constantly makes out that she's the wronged party and the way she puts her story across shows repeatedly why she's getting such a massive bashing from the press.

All I can see when she's spouting off is lie after lie after lie mixed with crocodile tears which has roped in quite a fair few people into believing she's the one who was wronged by McCartney when the people who have sense can blatently tell she's talking crap!

 

[old.Tohtori]

Well, i can discuss that in a way.

She's a public figure, so tv shows about it is a must really. This is nothing new.

She's telling her side of the story, could be lies, ofcourse, could not be also.

She couldnt' very well come on TV and say "Yes, he's a wonderful man and i wish i had done things differently." 'cause well, she wouldn't get anything like that. Ofcourse, she might also just be so pissed off at the marriage ending, that it's the reason for bashing.

Ofcourse civilized "he was simply putting his dingdong in other women, but that's men i guess" would be more civilized, but that's dependent on the person and their mood.

Not really sure, it could be either way, but as i said, i really don't like discussing who someone might be, by press/media. It's never so clear.

Also, i can see why you might hold this view, and it's not that it's wrong, heck, you might be 100% right, was just curious on the reason for "death wish" and why so many people hate her.

NS

 

[Raven]

She is some stupid one legged ex prostitute who married someone for money alone, she deserves fuck all.

 

[Sharma]

Sir Paul McCartney And Heather Mills Divorce: Judgement Key Points |Sky News|UK News

Pretty much states why I think she's an idiot.

 

[Binky the Bomb]

She's telling her side of the story, could be lies, ofcourse, could not be also.

Actually, the court transcripts have come out, as well as the summing up.

Its long and boring, but i'll give you the basic sum up of what the judge said about heather mils.

"Her evidence was scetchy at best, both written and oral, and that her statements wer less than candid." I.E. lying to a court.

 

[Calaen]

She lives in a fantasy world.