F
Fafnir
Guest
Wonder what would happen if Mythic reduced the damage on the back position style.
Aye been 2 hit to death to many times by none lvl 50 LW wieldersOriginally posted by Glyph_mid
I wouldnt be beaten shitless fully buffed with my thane vs unbuffed champs
Hibs dont need nerfs, especially enchanter !
Originally posted by Fafnir
Wonder what would happen if Mythic reduced the damage on the back position style.
1h weapon and shield you moffo. But perhaps you dont understand that.Originally posted by chiefbootknocka
fafnir the 1h thane
hahaha
Originally posted by Fafnir
Wonder what would happen if Mythic reduced the damage on the back position style.
Originally posted by Fafnir
Aye been 2 hit to death to many times by none lvl 50 LW wielders
Originally posted by Fafnir
Aye, but at yggdra gates i was 2 hit by a bluecon celt, he hit for 700 first hit, 600 second hit. So wonder what style that was, and it was a stun style. Could not use ip. And i had just killed druid there.
Originally posted by Omniscieous
not anytime, it needs back position
anytime would mean you could use it at 'any' time which is false
Originally posted by old.mattshanes
You must have bad resists.... by the way lw is decent because the lv50 style is infact an anytime style it seems..
(ok, this needs an evade but how many infis and mercs do you know who don't evade like mad).
Originally posted by vermillon
Finaly i want to say that since the other 2 realms have nothing similar i consider this style as an imbalance. At least there souldn't be a stun effect on it, is like having stun effect on Back Slash style or Snowsquall(9 sec stun on Snowsquall geezus ).
Originally posted by old.Lianuchta
And as for lack of stun on it, Slam once, run through, /face, leviathan*2 and dead just about anything.