Lord Of The Rings vs. Harry Potter?

C

crucifiercobain

Guest
Lord Of The Rings all the way in my opinion. What about you guys?
 
S

Sol-

Guest
what blatant post farming. you can reach 10 posts i know it :great:
 
A

**Aligro**

Guest
at skool we had to do coursework writing an essay comparing these 2 :/
 
A

Archeon

Guest
Hmmm.... Pre-pubesent kids.... evil dudes in black hacking shit out of stuff....Qwidetch (or however you spell it).... Helms gate/end whatever in LOTR2..... Hugs and kisses.... death and destruction..... dog with 3 heads.... balrog...... wizards...... gay hobbits......

Hmmmm...... tell you what, put the qwidetch sequences in LoTR3 and you'd have a nice film. But i'd have to say LoTR simply because all that spell casting shit gives me a headache.
 
S

StormriderX

Guest
lotr2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>harry potter
 
C

crucifiercobain

Guest
Originally posted by Sol-
what blatant post farming. you can reach 10 posts i know it :great:

It's off-topic, LoTR is off-topic, What's the problem?
 
J

Jonaldo

Guest
Debbie Does Dallas & Texas Chainsaw Massacre
 
K

Karlo

Guest
Originally posted by Sol-
what blatant post farming. you can reach 10 posts i know it :great:

lol sol, typical of you to join in the fun though :great:
 
O

old.shotgunstow

Guest
Originally posted by Omniscieous
Debbie Does Dallas & Texas Chainsaw Massacre

:ROFLMAO:

I'm still downloading Debbie Does Dallas. Watched the first part as it's on kazaa. Funny storyline ;))

Oh and on the off-topic topic I will say Lord of the Rings pwnz harry potter any day.
 
K

kan-

Guest
oh, like u can judge harry potter and lotr ffs.

harry potter = kids stuff.
 
C

*Coolio*

Guest
The only good that came from Harry Potter was hagrid.
 
F

flue

Guest
to say harry potter was crap is total shit from an idiot who didnt actually watch both films

they really are for 2 different audiences and there both very good

1st LOTR is aimed at the audience 13 + tbh and does its job increadibly well .the film maker peter jackson didnt get the whole book in there but who the hell could ..what he did do was keep the plot tru and moveing at the correct pace ..everyone involved with the filming has stated that the 3rd one will blow the other 2 to bits ..


2nd harry potter is aimed mainly at the childrens market but its very clever film makeing as anyone can actually watch this film and enjoy it even adults truly a family film in all its glory

so in short to say film a is better than film b here imo cant be done as there very different films
 
T

talen_sun

Guest
Harry Potter is a blatant and crap rip-off of Neil Gaimans 'The Books of Magic' graphic novels. (or comics if you prefer).

TBoM dealt a lot more with the darker occult side of magic, and follows the story of a child who finds out he has magic powers and that demons and such like actually exist. He is put under the tutalage of John Constantine, the one person most if not all baddies are scared of due to his repuation.

Harry Potter finds he can use a flying broomstick. Tat and rubbish.

If you are over 15(ish) then go find TBoM, a much better read, and a much better story...
 
K

Karam_gruul

Guest
debbie does dallas is a pwn, but not for its porn factor, coz its actually pretty crap porn (all sylicone babes) (although actually that gym teacher bird is well fit). but it does have a well funny storyline, and its u8z0R dubzored.

novamir was telling me about a film called david does dallas :sex: :whip: :eek2:
 
M

moo_work

Guest
Originally posted by Karam_gruul
debbie does dallas is a pwn, but not for its porn factor, coz its actually pretty crap porn (all sylicone babes) (although actually that gym teacher bird is well fit). but it does have a well funny storyline, and its u8z0R dubzored.

novamir was telling me about a film called david does dallas :sex: :whip: :eek2:

k thats not a farm and actually had some opinion on it so i'll let you go this time
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom