Imgormiel/Arcsalin(pryd.net) said:Clearly interpretations of the game should not be in the hands of GOA, but an ombudsman. They are clearly incapable of making decisions that merit their paying customers.
Cartees/Bullettime said:Im one of those that have stopped playing now becourse how the game have come. I have stopper paying my subs now on 3 accounts course of this. Im not saying i wont come back but i really dont like how GOA is reacting in things like this. What i can say is i will go inactive for atleast 4-5 months (wich means allmost never)
James St John said:The only reason it came to this state of affairs is because a small pocket of players were allowed to get away with behaviour not in keeping with the spirit of the game . It is fair enough to pull players on unsuitable names and behaviour towards players if malicious , but the core idea of the battle between the three realms cannot be allowed to be tainted by a drawn out Alarm Clocking of Relics which undermines the community spirit .
Bracken said:There are people both in your section of the community and my section of the community who aren't interested in this, never have been and never will be. It truly cuts both ways. Take the latest incident - it demonstrates it perfectly. Some of those involved in reducing the keep level have a history of acting like twats towards the "zerging" community and did so again in this instance with their responses. Some of those in the "zerging" community have a history of acting like twats to the "fg" community and did so again here. Neither side has any interest in the other. Some of us have tried in the past to get some forms of agreement that suits everyone, but there were always those intent on undermining it on both sides. So let's face it, there's always gonna be hostility because too many on both sides of the fence aren't interested in genuine resolution.
Sharkith said:Where you seem to be getting confused is in assuming that I think it is a representative view of the server as a whole. I never once claimed that. Likewise yopu are equally wrong to claim that it represents the views of the FG community.
Sharkith said:Indeed. I agree what I was pointing out though is just how quickly people like Muly (amongst others) will jump in to contribute to a whine thread and not once post in a thread such as this one which is attempting to reach some understanding of GOA's position and actions.
Sharkith said:When you have people like that being so vocal in a negative sense it means there is really little point in playing on a server with them. We all needed each other despite our differences the lack of tolerance seems to have put paid to server life for a big proportion of us in the end.
Bracken said:I've also already stated why TT weren't acting for "the community" but for the fg section of the community. If you seriously believe otherwise you must be very naive.
Muylaetrix said:TT had done something that is just not done. It looked crystal clear to me from the first min what would be the result. that GOA would act against TT seemed only natural to me tbh. 2 people got a 5 day ban, all normal. but what happened after that skyrocketed and escalated to a level that i hadn`t seen comming tbh.
strangely, those are my exact feelings over the other camp...
in the end everybody lost.
Kagato said:e staying are quitting are people like the Traitorous Twats, then i'd be glad to see the back of the scum.
You i'd of expected better from, but at least your able to see both sides to a degree and show a slight ounce of regret for what you've done to the realm.