Ladys and Gentlemen. I am going to astound and amaze you!

[hint]

Get this into your THICK WORTHLES WINGING HEADS!

Albs Zerg.
Hibs Zerg.
Mids Zerg.

Alb stealthers Zerg.
Hibs stealthers Zerg.
Mids stealthers Zerg.

Albs Camp mg's
Hibs camp mg's
Mids camp mg's

Alb stealthers camp the route from tk to mg.
Hibs stealthers camp the route from tk to mg.
Mids stealthers camp the route from tk to mg

Albs do keep and relic raids at rediculas times in the morning.
Hibs do keep and relic raids at rediculas times in the morning.
Mids do keep and relic raids at rediculas times in the morning.

You got owned
He got owned
I get owned
We all get owned now and then. yes even Alpha.

The level and RR of your char does not indicate your knowledge and experiance with the game. neither does it indicate your intelegence. Even a retarded goat can pl a tank and then zerg round emain and get a few RR's in the space of a month.


Hibs have an overpowered class
Mids have an overpowered class
Albs...... well soon as necros LoS is fixed i don't think albs can claim one but i am willing to be proven wrong.

Did you notice that. i an willing to be proven wrong. i am allso willing to accept that my own realm is responsible for doing things that may or may not anoy me when i am on the receiving end of them from the other realms. Pehaps you should consider this option.

Now i know that there are some members of this forum that seem to have at least a basic understanding of this but a vast majority need to take their heads out of their arses (or in some casses other peoples arses) and see the world for the way it realy is.

 

[Novamir]

Finley level 44 Friar

no offence, but is this your first/lowest level char? please don't come preaching to RR5+s about RvR.

ps. it's an old topic done to death, we all know this, and no you won't stop people whining about it when they want to.

 

[Cronn]

If no one here whined about zergs and overpowered classes this board would be pretty fucking dull.

 

[Novamir]

yea and imagine if we didn't have Cronn.

 

[hint]

ah that old chestnut. I have a level 50 you don't so i don't care what you say.

I have still been playing this game for near a year now. i have still managed enough RvR with my level 44 friar to get RR2l7 (oh i know its not RR5 is it? so freekin what for a level 44 class that can barely last 5 seconds against a red con its not bad.)

it would apear i forgot to ad one thing to my post above please excuse my ignorance i shall edit it accordingly.

 

[Vengeful]

I am astounded and amazededededed...


kthx

 

[hint]

good good. i was woried i might get done for false advertising for a while

 

[Arnor]

yes we HAVE all done that shit, but ffs mids stopped camping the fucking milegate in 1.48 or 1.52 or sumt. your retarded zerglings still sit on mmg for hours on end, just making rvr in emain crappy.
And I wish everyone that does that on a regular basis burn in hell, that special hell reserved for child molesters and milegate-campers, oh and george w. bush and saddam

 

[hint]

just because they don't do it when you are there doesn't meen they don't do it at all.

only a few nights back albs were forced into odins by the fact that a mid zerg wasn't even letting any albs get as far as the mg.

so no they wern't exactly camping the mg.


and no im not whineing. i dont like it when people do that. (tho i do like a good mg fight now and then just not all night long) and yes albs do it aswell im sure. and Hibs did do it and will do it when they finish exploreing SI

 

[Danya]

Blue con alb warder (warder-zerg member #138) preaches to us all about RvR.
Did we all know everything posted already? Yes, most of us did.
Does anyone care? I doubt it.

"i have still managed enough RvR with my level 44 friar to get RR2l7"
Hmm, 37k RPs, so you RvRed for an evening and think you know all? k

 

[Vengeful]

arnor - I agree, George W bush and Saddam are pea's of a pod... on that note here are some intersting facts.... I got this today in a chain emain and some of this stuff really shocked me


1. Q: What percentage of the world's population does the U.S. have?
>
>A: 6%
>
>2. Q: What percentage of the world's wealth does the U.S. have?
>
>A: 50%
>
>3. Q: Which country has the largest oil reserves?
>
>A: Saudi Arabia
>
>4. Q: Which country has the second largest oil reserves?
>
>A: Iraq
>
>5. Q: How much is spent on military budgets a year worldwide?
>
>A: $900+ billion
>
>6. Q: How much of this is spent by the U.S.?
>
>A: 50%
>
>7. Q: What percent of US military spending would ensure the essentials of life to everyone in the world, according the UN?
>
>A: 10% (that's about$40 billion, the amount of funding initially requested to fund our retaliatory attack on Afghanistan).
>
>8. Q: How many people have died in wars since World War II?
>
>A: 86 million
>
>9. Q: How long has Iraq had chemical and biological weapons?
>
>A: Since the early 1980's.
>
>10. Q: Did Iraq develop these chemical & biological weapons on their own?
>
>A: No, the materials and technology were supplied by the US government, along with Britain and private corporations.
>
>11. Q: Did the US government condemn the Iraqi use of gas warfare against Iran?
>
>A: No
>
>12. Q: How many people did Saddam Hussein kill using gas in the Kurdish town of Halabja in 1988?
>
>A: 5,000
>
>13. Q: How many western countries condemned this action at the time?
>
>A: 0
>
>14. Q: How many gallons of agent Orange did America use in Vietnam?
>
>A: 17million.
>
>15. Q: Are there any proven links between Iraq and September 11th terrorist attack?
>
>A: No
>
>16. Q: What is the estimated number of civilian casualties in the Gulf War?
>
>A: 35,000
>
>17. Q: How many casualties did the Iraqi military inflict on the western forces during the Gulf War ?
>
>A: 0
>
>18. Q: How many retreating Iraqi soldiers were buried alive by U.S. tanks with ploughs mounted on the front?
>
>A: 6,000
>
>19. Q: How many tons of depleted uranium were left in Iraq and Kuwait after the Gulf War?
>
>A: 40 tons
>
>20. Q: What according to the UN was the increase in cancer rates in Iraq between 1991 and 1994?
>
>A: 700%
>
>21. Q: How much of Iraq's military capacity did America claim it had destroyed in 1991?
>
>A: 80%
>
>22. Q: Is there any proof that Iraq plans to use its weapons for anything other than deterrence and self defense?
>
>A: No
>
>23. Q: Does Iraq present more of a threat to world peace now than 10 years ago?
>
>A: No
>
>24. Q: How many civilian deaths has the Pentagon predicted in the event of an attack on Iraq in 2002/3?
>
>A: 10,000
>
>25. Q: What percentage of these will be children?
>
>A:Over 50%
>
>26. Q: How many years has the U.S. engaged in air strikes on Iraq?
>
>A: 11 years
>
>27. Q: Were the U.S and the UK at war with Iraq between December 1998 and September 1999?
>
>A: No
>
>28. Q: How many pounds of explosives were dropped on Iraq between December 1998 and September 1999?
>
>A: 20 million
>
>29. Q: How many years ago was UN Resolution 661 introduced, imposing strict sanctions on Iraq's imports and exports?
>
>A: 12 years
>
>30. Q: What was the child death rate in Iraq in 1989 (per 1,000 births)?
>
>A: 38
>
>31. Q: What was the estimated child death rate in Iraq in 1999 (per 1,000 births)?
>
>A: 131 (that's an increase of 345%)
>
>32. Q: How many Iraqis are estimated to have died by October 1999 as a result of UN sanctions?
>
>A: 1.5 million
>
>33. Q: How many Iraqi children are estimated to have died due to sanctions since 1997?
>
>A: 750,000
>
>34. Q: Did Saddam order the inspectors out of Iraq?
>
>A: No
>
>35. Q: How many inspections were there in November and December 1998?
>
>A: 300
>
>36. Q: How many of these inspections had problems?
>
>A: 5
>
>37. Q: Were the weapons inspectors allowed entry to the Ba'ath Party HQ?
>
>A: Yes
>
>38. Q: Who said that by December 1998, "Iraq had in fact, been disarmed to a level unprecedented in modern history."
>
>A: Scott Ritter, UNSCOM chief.
>
>39. Q: In 1998 how much of Iraq's post 1991 capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction did the UN weapons inspectors claim to have discovered and dismantled?
>
>A: 90%
>
>40. Q: Is Iraq willing to allow the weapons inspectors back in ?
>
>A: Yes
>
>41. Q: How many UN resolutions did Israel violate by 1992?
>
>A: Over 65
>
>42. Q: How many UN resolutions on Israel did America veto between 1972 and 1990?
>
>A: 30+
>
>44. Q: How many countries are known to have nuclear weapons?
>
>A: 8
>
>45. Q: How many nuclear warheads has Iraq got?
>
>A: 0
>
>46. Q: How many nuclear warheads has US got?
>
>A: Over 10,000
>
>47. Q: Which is the only country to use nuclear weapons?
>
>A: The US
>
>48. Q: How many nuclear warheads does Israel have?
>
>A: Over 400
>
>50. Q: Who said, "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter"?
>
>A: Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr
>
>Charles Sheketoff, Executive Director Oregon Center for Public Policy PO Box 7, Silverton, OR 97381

 

[katt!]

Originally posted by Arnor2
yes we HAVE all done that shit, but ffs mids stopped camping the fucking milegate in 1.48 or 1.52 or sumt.

no.

 

[-Shaz-]

Originally posted by hint
intelegence

...

 

[hint]

Originally posted by Danyan
Blue con alb warder (warder-zerg member #138) preaches to us all about RvR.
Did we all know everything posted already? Yes, most of us did.
Does anyone care? I doubt it.

"i have still managed enough RvR with my level 44 friar to get RR2l7"
Hmm, 37k RPs, so you RvRed for an evening and think you know all? k

here we go again.

perhaps 37k rps is one eavening for a level 50 rr5 zerging in emain but its not so easy to get with a friar that spends a large amount of time avoiding emain.

i would allso like to point out i am not teaching you how to RvR.
I am not saying i know all about RvR.

and once again your ability in and knowledge of RvR is only losely related to what level, con or rr you are. a green con rr1l1 with a few brains can grasp most of what they need to know in a few short nights and work the rest out for them selve soon after. whereas a level 50 RR10l9 may know jack shit and just spend countless hours running round emain in a zerg spamming the F8, stick and F6 buttons.

 

[hint]

Re: Re: Ladys and Gentlemen. I am going to astound and amaze you!

Originally posted by -Shaz-
...

im sorry did i spell it wrong?

oh well the down side to being dyslexic and too lazy to proof read.

 

[-Shaz-]

There are many typos, I just thought that was ironic.

As for the statement...

There is no statement.

People know this.

While I'm here I might aswell go on my crusade to prove DAoC does not involve skill. People who think it does need to be publically taunted.

Anyway...sleep

 

[hint]

some people know this but it seems a significat portion of the posts in this forum (60% 70%? more?) seem to neglect these facts.

 

[Danya]

Originally posted by hint
perhaps 37k rps is one eavening for a level 50 rr5 zerging in emain but its not so easy to get with a friar that spends a large amount of time avoiding emain.

I'm not RR5. Nor do I "zerg" emain, a large amount of my RPs are made in odin's and almost all my RPs have been made in 1-2 fg groups, not zergs.

Originally posted by hint
i would allso like to point out i am not teaching you how to RvR.
I am not saying i know all about RvR.

That's not the impression you give.

Originally posted by hint
and once again your ability in and knowledge of RvR is only losely related to what level, con or rr you are. a green con rr1l1 with a few brains can grasp most of what they need to know in a few short nights and work the rest out for them selve soon after. whereas a level 50 RR10l9 may know jack shit and just spend countless hours running round emain in a zerg spamming the F8, stick and F6 buttons.

A large part of being "good" at RvR is knowing how to react. That comes from experience. RPs are a fairly good measure of time spent RvRing and thus a measure of experience. Yes some people will always be crap, but generally most people can pick up what they need to know with a bit of time. Also RvR <50 is different to RvR at 50, hence people saying you being level 44 makes a difference.

 

[old.Tzeentch]

Originally posted by hint
here we go again.

perhaps 37k rps is one eavening for a level 50 rr5 zerging in emain but its not so easy to get with a friar that spends a large amount of time avoiding emain.

i would allso like to point out i am not teaching you how to RvR.
I am not saying i know all about RvR.

and once again your ability in and knowledge of RvR is only losely related to what level, con or rr you are. a green con rr1l1 with a few brains can grasp most of what they need to know in a few short nights and work the rest out for them selve soon after. whereas a level 50 RR10l9 may know jack shit and just spend countless hours running round emain in a zerg spamming the F8, stick and F6 buttons.

lol

i'd be pretty amazed if any bard could learn what has taken me months, in a few nights of 'zerging emain'

learn this - emain is not only zerging, it's you anti-rvr carebears who feed this shit excuse

it can be a pretty amazing experience ingame, when you meet an organised zerg, and you organise one yourself to combat it, some of the best battles can occur in this situation

but, what people whine about, is people zerging when there is no need to zerg.. aka, RG camping amg 4am in the morning, with 5fg.

 

[katt!]

Originally posted by hint
some people know this but it seems a significat portion of the posts in this forum (60% 70%? more?) seem to neglect these facts.

thats because pointing that out pisses people off. and pissing people off is fun.

 

[hint]

Originally posted by Danyan

That's not the impression you give.

not once did i tell people how to rvr or how not to. not once did i say anything about my own prowess or lack there off i can't see anywhere in my post you could get this impresion.

 

[hint]

Originally posted by old.Tzeentch
lol

i'd be pretty amazed if any bard could learn what has taken me months, in a few nights of 'zerging emain'

learn this - emain is not only zerging, it's you anti-rvr carebears who feed this shit excuse

it can be a pretty amazing experience ingame, when you meet an organised zerg, and you organise one yourself to combat it, some of the best battles can occur in this situation

but, what people whine about, is people zerging when there is no need to zerg.. aka, RG camping amg 4am in the morning, with 5fg.

Yes i know emain can be great. i have had some great battles there. i do find however that the fun encounters come in a much higher ratio if you avoid emain. perhaps its down to us albs not being abble to organise a piss up in a brothel. or is it score in a brewery? ah well no matter.

and yes there are some things it takes a while to learn and some classes are more complex than others. but you can learn enough to be a good RvR player in a verry short time. Becoming great at it however may be an entierly diferent chalenge

 

[hint]

Originally posted by Danyan

A large part of being "good" at RvR is knowing how to react. That comes from experience. RPs are a fairly good measure of time spent RvRing and thus a measure of experience. Yes some people will always be crap, but generally most people can pick up what they need to know with a bit of time. Also RvR <50 is different to RvR at 50, hence people saying you being level 44 makes a difference.

sorry for the repeated posts i keep missing bits

im not so sure about this. a lack of RP's does not nesesaraly relate to a lack of experiance really. yes it meens you have spent less time in RvR but its all about how quickly you learn.
and yes i know RvR at 44 is verry diferent to 50. its why i don't spend more time in RvR. its extreemly diferent for me. i spend most of my time healing because i don't stand a chance trying to tank a red con player. at level 50 this will change.

to be honist the only reason im not level 50 is i hate the xp slog. i really hate it. :/

 

[Danya]

Originally posted by hint
not once did i tell people how to rvr or how not to. not once did i say anything about my own prowess or lack there off i can't see anywhere in my post you could get this impresion.

It's the tone of your psot not the actual words.

Originally posted by hint
im not so sure about this. a lack of RP's does not nesesaraly relate to a lack of experiance really. yes it meens you have spent less time in RvR but its all about how quickly you learn

RPs = time spent.
Experience = time spent.
You work it out.

 

[hint]

sorry if i implyed that. the tone of my post was not due to me thinking i know it all about rvr. it was down to me getting pissed off at another post saying "our stealthers don't zerg yours do" straw that brock the camels mind realy.


as for the rvr experiance time bit i think you will find i said that in the verry quote you used. my point was that some people learn quicker than others and can gain one hell of allot of experiance from a short time. again you wont learn asmuch from 5 weaks running round in a zerg as you will from a few days spent Zerging, taking and defending keeps with small and large forces, soloing, running round in 1fg of tanks, runing round in 1fg of casters, running round in a balanced fg etc etc.......

 

[Eleasias]

Originally posted by hint

Albs...... well soon as necros LoS is fixed i don't think albs can claim one but i am willing to be proven wrong.

Finley level 44 Friar

 

[noaim]

Re: Re: Ladys and Gentlemen. I am going to astound and amaze you!

Originally posted by Eleasias

Damn you beat me to it...with over an hour...bah

 

[tankster]

Finley should be the king of alb !

 

[Adralend]

Originally posted by Novamir
no offence, but is this your first/lowest level char? please don't come preaching to RR5+s about RvR.

ps. it's an old topic done to death, we all know this, and no you won't stop people whining about it when they want to.

You are the living proof that you can have a 50 char and still be a n00b.

Have a nice day!

 

[old.BJ|Bored]

lies albs dont zerg! only hibs mids do ffs










...........i cant resist im weak