Matmardigan said:Fuckin movie makers tryin to suggest that 1 fuckin fg albs can kill 403595397538973789375693759375397653756 fgm.
Matmardigan said:My point is. The movie could be done much better if the producers would take some aspects from pc games like daoc.
just think about it how the movie could be if there where fight scenes like we have in the game.
Matmardigan said:the whole mystical part of Arthurs legend was missing. And that its whats make the Arthur Legend intresting imo. Wasnt Merlin a Wizard? they made him an rumpus maker with green dye in his face. No magic, no visualeffects, nothing.
i mean what i wrote
Just talkin about from the visualeffects point of view
an simple pc game have more visualeffects than an realy expansive made Hollywood movie.
Imagine an big fight at bowl, alot of albs,mids, hibs everybody against everybody with all this abilitiy effects which mythic gave the chars. Magical visualeffects like from mana spect eldritch, an firewizard or any other classes.
After lotr i expected more than that from the movie.
They just made Merlin more realistic.Matmardigan said:the whole mystical part of Arthurs legend was missing. And that its whats make the Arthur Legend intresting imo. Wasnt Merlin a Wizard? they made him an rumpus maker with green dye in his face. No magic, no visualeffects, nothing.
Matmardigan said:My point is. The movie could be done much better if the producers would take some aspects from pc games like daoc.
just think about it how the movie could be if there where fight scenes like we have in the game.
Bang on m8, was very intresting. Not all films has to have visual effects galore to make it good.Belomar said:I liked the movie, it was an alternate way of looking at the legend of Arthur.
Belomar said:Reading this thread, the original poster is a 13 year-old who likes to swear a lot, enjoys lots of "kewl" visual effects, wants DAoC in every aspect of his life ("like, wtf, wouldn't it be c00l if you had to stealth to school every morning m8s?"), and considers Die Hard 2 to be "too intellectual" for his taste.
I liked the movie, it was an alternate way of looking at the legend of Arthur.
Belomar said:Reading this thread, the original poster is a 13 year-old who likes to swear a lot, enjoys lots of "kewl" visual effects, wants DAoC in every aspect of his life ("like, wtf, wouldn't it be c00l if you had to stealth to school every morning m8s?"), and considers Die Hard 2 to be "too intellectual" for his taste.
I liked the movie, it was an alternate way of looking at the legend of Arthur.
watch the film again.. arthur wasnt a russian slave, though the nights were in a way although I saw them as more like indentured servants.Matmardigan said:bullshit.
Arthur an russian slave with his nagin friends fightin 4 an regime which shits on them.
thats an bad alternate way of lookin at the Arthus Legend.
Xplo said:Lancelot dies at the end of the movie, arthur marries guinevere and gets crowned king. The End.
btw that fg albs owning those 200 mids was hilarious xD