tris-
Failed Geordie and Parmothief
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2004
- Messages
- 15,260
A warning would have sufficed and you are entitled to such before instant dismissal ><
not always and especially if something is classed as gross misconduct youre fucked.
A warning would have sufficed and you are entitled to such before instant dismissal ><
not always and especially if something is classed as gross misconduct youre fucked.
She said the proper procedure would have been to offer to poor the glass out again after he said i slightly overpoured it.
I was like 'Bitch who would want their glass repoured if they got slightly more than they payed for!?' Then i falcon punched her in the ovaries and burned down the restaurant.
(the second bit may or may not have happened)
oh and btw i've been through unfair dismissal so i know the UK law on this subject immaculately![]()
then i have to wonder why you give incorrect information.
you are not required to be given a notice for dismissal if youre in what is commonly accepted as a probationary period, which will be stated in the contract.
then i have to wonder why you give incorrect information.
you are not required to be given a notice for dismissal if youre in what is commonly accepted as a probationary period, which will be stated in the contract.
Actually Tris in the employee handbook it states you have to give notice regardless of status as a trainee, mines in the post apparently.
Errr, 1mm of wine and a friendly comment is hardly gross misconduct, nor was it insubordination, oh and btw i've been through unfair dismissal so i know the UK law on this subject immaculately![]()