E
eneq
Guest
WEll roaming emain could b lots of fun when avoiding the hot spots.
You would encounter many 1 FG and have fun battles.
I remember one time we killed 1 fg after 10 secs next FG was inc.
Nowdays wherever you go there is at least 2 fgs. Seems no-one dare to go emain in 1 fg....
NP started the RvR 2 fg guild groups and owned in emain.
Then FC jumped the bandwagon with 2 fgs roaming between Crim and aileene. And lately LA joined the 2 fgs bandwagon.
Mythic/GOA cant make a zone where only 1 fg v 1 fg but maybe we can make a arrangment that to, lets say, Hadrians wall we only go 1 fg and no more?
I know that we cant control the Zergs but the zerg when coming in 2 FG is easy to kill sometimes.
BTW i dont say its wrong to go 2 fg. But maybe lets get back the old Hib (well we had it ) mentality that NEVER go with more then 8.
We had it back in the Cuth/Novamir days. (If you a hib you know what i mean)
You would encounter many 1 FG and have fun battles.
I remember one time we killed 1 fg after 10 secs next FG was inc.
Nowdays wherever you go there is at least 2 fgs. Seems no-one dare to go emain in 1 fg....
NP started the RvR 2 fg guild groups and owned in emain.
Then FC jumped the bandwagon with 2 fgs roaming between Crim and aileene. And lately LA joined the 2 fgs bandwagon.
Mythic/GOA cant make a zone where only 1 fg v 1 fg but maybe we can make a arrangment that to, lets say, Hadrians wall we only go 1 fg and no more?
I know that we cant control the Zergs but the zerg when coming in 2 FG is easy to kill sometimes.
BTW i dont say its wrong to go 2 fg. But maybe lets get back the old Hib (well we had it ) mentality that NEVER go with more then 8.
We had it back in the Cuth/Novamir days. (If you a hib you know what i mean)
