cHodAX
I am a FH squatter
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2004
- Messages
- 19,742

i learnt no to listen to people on here about movies, they are the most critical people on the planet. Iron man 1 was brilliant and this one looks great too
Sherlock bad? Iron man bad?
What is this, the anally suppressed club?
Ironman 2 looks great, has some nice enough characters in it too.

I never understood why it's ok for action films to be crap ?!?
(haven't seen Iron Man and prolly never will)
i didnt like the first one because it followed the same formula that half the other superman films follow without bringing anything new. add the fact that the main character went through what would kill anyone else in world about 8 times yet came out unscathed everytime.
what's the point in watching a film like this when the main character is invincible? and that's without his suit on
i didnt like the first one because it followed the same formula that half the other superman films follow without bringing anything new. add the fact that the main character went through what would kill anyone else in world about 8 times yet came out unscathed everytime.
what's the point in watching a film like this when the main character is invincible? and that's without his suit on
Quite enjoyed the first film. Always liked Iron Man, think I prefer the character as he's just a man with a suit, rather than a mutant. Very vulnerable without the suit on, whereas someone like wolverine for example is never going to get taken by surprise.
unless he drops the soap in the shower and collossus gets woo...I mean metal.
I bet that'd surprise the hell outta him tbh.
I dont know, you might be right since i dislike the comic book movies more often than like![]()
Scarlett Johansson with red hair in leatherrrrrr...![]()
I never understood why it's ok for action films to be crap ?!?
(haven't seen Iron Man and prolly never will)

I never understood why it's ok for action films to be crap ?!?
(haven't seen Iron Man and prolly never will)