Dr Watson usually tells him.Loxleyhood said:Someone inform Sherlock.
There's another place beginning with "S" they haven't checked eitherJonaldo said:Have they checked behind the sofa or in the shed yet?
Jonaldo said:*snip* Things always turn up when you least expect to find them, and often the last place you look. *snip*
Doh_boy said:So says the guy that was looking for them. He's resigned and said there's nothing to find. Also the new guy in charge has said he doesn't think there are either.
So they weren't there. Someone was right.![]()
Actually the majority of them that were catalogued and checked after the first Gulf War were destroyed by the inspectors way back circa 1993. The question is what's happened to the few that we know weren't destroyed by the inspectors, and what's happened to the WMDs that he's alleged to have created since the 1990's that we haven't catalogued. And what Kay is saying is that he didn't make any more in the first place. That still leaves a bit of a shortfall but it is looking like Saddam's WMDs stockpile was greatly exaggerated. But of course, it doesn't matter that the case for war was faulty because - hey - Saddam is no longer in power and will met justice. Hmm, who can't admit they were wrong then...Bob007 said:Question has to asked, Where are they now ? They know he had them, They were cateloged and checked after the kuwait war, You don't just put a match to them and watch them burn away.
OblongChicken said:But of course, it doesn't matter that the case for war was faulty because - hey - Saddam is no longer in power and will met justice. Hmm, who can't admit they were wrong then...
Well, not always. Personally I don't care about WMD, the end justifies the means IMO.Jonaldo said:it's just the way the countries out there have always been run.
I wish he bloody would. He could then install Staz as president. He seeme to be one of the few amongst you who has a clue.Jonaldo said:IIf George Bush now decides that Tony Blair is a 'cnut', does that give him a right to then bombard us and install a new government?
If only you were also one of those who had a clue eh?Bodhi said:I wish he bloody would. He could then install Staz as president. He seeme to be one of the few amongst you who has a clue.
Is that so you can see his breasts bounce around on public TV?I wish he bloody would. He could then install Staz as president. He seeme to be one of the few amongst you who has a clue.
Well seeing as I agree with him, that must mean if Staz has a clue I have a clue aswell! In future make sure the old brain is engaged before putting the mouth into gear eh?Jonaldo said:If only you were also one of those who had a clue eh?![]()
Poor argument. I know that Einstein had a clue about the theory of relativity and brain surgeons have clues how to operate inside peoples heads. However, this doesn't necessarily mean I have a clue about it.Bodhi said:Well seeing as I agree with him, that must mean if Staz has a clue I have a clue aswell! In future make sure the old brain is engaged before putting the mouth into gear eh?
Panda, erm, well. Yes.
![]()
It's called a "pre-emptive strike", and nowday's it's political suicide to do it, as Bush and Blair will find to their cost. Most people prefer conflicts to happen and lots of people to die before collective action is taken against it, even when the signs are so obviously there, it seems like we have to just let it all happen.Jonaldo said:I think the only problem is that if some people start a war just because they don't like another world leader that does kind of set an example for others to follow.
Saddam was the biggest bully of the lot with the biggest stick, taking him down so easily will hopefully bring all the others to heel, already Libya has rolled over and asked for it's tummy to be tickled.Jonaldo said:Admittedly Saddam was a complete bastard but most leaders out in the middle-east are, it's just the way the countries out there have always been run.
That's a pretty poor example. How do you know Einstein had a clue about Relativity if you know nothing about the subject itself? All you are relying on is whoever told you that Einstein has a clue. He could have been flat out wrong for all you know (in fact some parts of the Theory of Relativity have recently come into question).Jonaldo said:Poor argument. I know that Einstein had a clue about the theory of relativity and brain surgeons have clues how to operate inside peoples heads. However, this doesn't necessarily mean I have a clue about it.
Just because you recognise someone knows something doesn't mean that you do. And all he stated was an opinion which is totally out of line how international politics work, which is roughly how we invaded Iraq, totally against all rules that we helped set in place.