P
LMAO - class.The Mirror reports Hansen was asked which match was next up and replied: "It's the f***ing Krauts."
Originally posted by camazotz
The debate will go on about that Ronaldinho's goal, its obvious from the way he took it it was just a fluffed kick in, not aimed at all. It was like that super-flukey Carlos goal some time back when he crossed the ball from right on the baseline and it curled round and went in.
Originally posted by Perplex
Let me take a wild guess - had Beckham scored that goal, it would have been hailed as the goal of the decade, and praises would be sung to his amazing set piece abilities. Ronaldinho claims he intended it (and let's face it - he saw no wall had formed, and he saw Seaman 6+ yards off his line - a player of that ability would have a pot shot) and frankly as Ian Wright said, the whole manner of the shot (his approach, his stance, his contact) indicated that in fact he was aiming for goal.
He may have been a bit fortunate at just how top-corner it ended up being, but I have no doubt he was trying to catch out the dazed and confused Seaman wandering around the penalty area like a fool
I think he meant it - posted by Sar (BW Member) on Fri 21 June 2002 19:54:02
He saw England still sorting themselves out, Seaman off his line etc.
His body shape was all wrong if it was meant to be a cross, I definitely think he intended it as a shot. As said above if it had been Beckham then it'd be hailed as Goal of the Century or somesuch.
Seamans fault though - stupid bugger should've been more alert.
That is a bullshit attitude.I blame Seaman. If he is honest with himself he would blame Seaman too (if you understand my meaning). Cost us the fucking world cup.
Originally posted by Durzel
That is a bullshit attitude.
Saying Seaman "cost us the World Cup" is a pretty arrogant thing to say. Try to remember that before you hang someone out to dry for making one mistake.
Originally posted by Bodhi
Ronaldinhio's goal was intentional. He has said that himself.
Originally posted by FatBusinessman
However, he would have said that even if it was a fluke. Because then he looks like a skilled player rather than a jammy cunt.
Originally posted by Perplex
Granted - but the fact remains that he is a skillful player? Easily more 'skillful' than any of the pitiful offerings England has to offer. He is easily in the top 10 players of the world
And imho, the Brazillians dominate the 'top 10 players of the world'
Originally posted by Ono
As for the *bastard ladyboy son of Jar Jar Bink's*