Horrible (No) Support History and What to check in yer laptop

Gahn

Resident Freddy
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
5,056
As a support person, your first priority is to protect your end users and help them do their job with the tools they’re given. The story of what happened to Michael Fiola is a cautionary tale that all support personnel should take to heart.

——————————————————————————————————————-

Michael Fiola is a decent guy just doing his job with the tools he has been given by his (now former) employer, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. They issued him a Dell Latitude laptop to facilitate him writing reports in the field; he used it for that purpose. Fiola, a former investigator with the Massachusetts Department of Industrial Accidents, faced two and a half years in prison after being charged with possession of child pornography.

According to Tami Loehrs, a forensic investigator hired by the defense team, the laptop that Fiola was issued by his employer was a “ticking time bomb.”

From PC World:

The Microsoft Systems Management Server software on the laptop was misconfigured and was not receiving critical software updates, and the laptop’s Symantec antivirus software was either misconfigured or not working properly, she said.

State IT staff examined Fiola’s laptop in March 2007 after they noticed that his Verizon broadband wireless usage was four times above normal. He was fired the same month, after the pornography was discovered.
Fiola, a former firefighter with no criminal record, was ostracized by his community after being criminally charged in August 2007, [attorney, Timothy] Bradl said. “His life has been destroyed,” he said. “His friends ran for the hills; his family mostly ran from him.”

Since his wife, Robin, was at one point hospitalized for a stress-related illness, Fiola is now facing health insurance payments in excess of his monthly mortgage. But he is unlikely to take his old job back, even if the DIA were to offer it, Bradl said. “I would think that theoretically he’d be entitled to his job back with back-pay, however he would never want to go back to work with such buffoons,” he said.

——————————————————————————————————————-

While CNET’s Matt Asay saw a Windows vs *nix/Mac issue, I see something different. I see a clear case of what can horribly happen when the workday gets so crowded that we stop thinking critically about what we are doing.

The support side of the house gets crammed with activities, some of which have little to do with what our job is supposed to be — providing user support. I can look at this tragic situation and pretty much know what happened.

A work order was sent to the Support team who pulled a laptop out of stores that may or may not have been re-imaged. Maybe it was imaged when it came in and the image was out-dated. Maybe it got a fresh image but was flawed. It got onto a bench where someone checked to make sure that the necessary software was in place but it is highly unlikely that anyone had the time to check that each program ran properly. And then it was issued to the user.

In an interview with IDGNS (the parent of PC World), Fiola admits that he is not a tech savvy end user. His whole computing experience is limited to being able to get on to the network, use his e-mail, and use the applications that facilitate his job. He doesn’t browse, doesn’t game, doesn’t chat. He just does his job. That means that if his AV isn’t working, he wouldn’t necessarily know to alert the Support team that something is wrong.

Michael Fiola is the face of most of our end users. In the course of my career, I have had to paint the power button with red nail polish for a user who could never find it on her PC — not to humiliate her — she loved being able to see the thing. But that experience was a wake up call to me that my end users might not know the first thing about the tools that they needed to do their jobs and made me more aware of what I needed to do to protect them.

What is truly sad in this is that Fiola’s life will never be the same. I can only imagine that the Support team that issued him the laptop in the first place is sick about that. I am certain that they never intended something like this and I strongly doubt that the oversight that caused the situation was in any way targeted to Fiola. But it happened.

As support people, our responsibility is to keep both our networks and our end users safe. This cautionary tale reminds us that that is our first responsibility, no matter how insane the work day gets.

How do you avoid a problem like this? What check lists do you run when issuing a computer to an end user? Or can you see a place where your procedures could use some re-checking?

More information:

IT Business Edge — What you don’t know can hurt you — when it’s on your laptop
 

Kryten

Old Cow.
Moderator
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
3,351
I've heard of more than one occurance of this exact type, but being British, there was no problem caused for the user.

Americans are too brash, and dare I say it, far too stupid to worry about end consequences.

Basically telling your entire country that "This guy is a paedophile" before actually investigating anything is a very good example of this. At least here (in most cases, it has happened The American Way) investigations occur first before saying anything to anyone in the public eye.

Then of course you look at different circumstances. Gary Glitter for one :)
 

Gahn

Resident Freddy
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
5,056
I've heard of more than one occurance of this exact type, but being British, there was no problem caused for the user.

Americans are too brash, and dare I say it, far too stupid to worry about end consequences.

Basically telling your entire country that "This guy is a paedophile" before actually investigating anything is a very good example of this. At least here (in most cases, it has happened The American Way) investigations occur first before saying anything to anyone in the public eye.

Then of course you look at different circumstances. Gary Glitter for one :)

Typical not only of the American Culture to throw some1 in newspaper 1st page with a big "The Monster" title under his face.
Then when they find him innocent they write it in the low corner of the 10th page -.-
 

Kryten

Old Cow.
Moderator
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
3,351
Yes, nail on the head. No respect whatsoever for the innocent people they've basically made guilty. Lives ruined, but that's not important enough to worry about to the media.
 

Chilly

Balls of steel
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,047
The police here (in Blighty) made a royal fuckup with a similar thing involving arresting and publishing the names of credit card owners whos card was used on one of a list of kiddie pron sites. No one stopped to think that it was extremely likely that child pornographers are one of the top buyers for stolen CC information to protect their identities from the pigs.

As far as I remember, some guy killed himself because his entire family and all his friends believed the accusation (why wouldnt you? If the police say it, it's got to be fairly credible....surely?) and turned his life to shit.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom