Hooter's

old.Tohtori

FH is my second home
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
45,210
Tacky, down right insulting if you happen to be a feminist, demeaning also on that line too.

Just have to comment, it's tacky, for certain, but insulting to feminists is silly(i know women say "objectifying!" at everything), since no woman has ever demanded an advertisement by CK or a half naked man to cover up.

Go figure, it's only objectifying if it's a woman? Please.

Anyhoo-ters, wish i could go some time. I've heard the food is quite good.
 

Imgormiel

Part of the furniture
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
4,372
Just have to comment, it's tacky, for certain, but insulting to feminists is silly(i know women say "objectifying!" at everything), since no woman has ever demanded an advertisement by CK or a half naked man to cover up.

Go figure, it's only objectifying if it's a woman? Please.

Anyhoo-ters, wish i could go some time. I've heard the food is quite good.

Food is nice and yes you should go!!!

But man, when you get to my age and you learn anything about women's prerogative is this, you will always lose if you are a bloke. It's just one of nature's bitching ways >(
 

old.Tohtori

FH is my second home
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
45,210
Food is nice and yes you should go!!!

But man, when you get to my age and you learn anything about women's prerogative is this, you will always lose if you are a bloke. It's just one of nature's bitching ways >(

Your age? How old are you exactly, 'cause i'm 28 and i think i'm more then enough educated on the prerogative issue, but i'm here to tell, it's bull, you DON'T have to lose.
 

Imgormiel

Part of the furniture
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
4,372
Your age? How old are you exactly, 'cause i'm 28 and i think i'm more then enough educated on the prerogative issue, but i'm here to tell, it's bull, you DON'T have to lose.

My age is 37, i'd guess i'd know about it a bit better than you :)
 

Imgormiel

Part of the furniture
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
4,372
Your age? How old are you exactly, 'cause i'm 28 and i think i'm more then enough educated on the prerogative issue, but i'm here to tell, it's bull, you DON'T have to lose.

And may be you don't but life does get a little easier if you give and take, or at least make them think they are winning :)
 

old.Tohtori

FH is my second home
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
45,210
My age is 37, i'd guess i'd know about it a bit better than you :)

And may be you don't but life does get a little easier if you give and take, or at least make them think they are winning :)

The knowledge depends on many issues(like you're a different agegroup, different culture, different women, different ways to spend youth, different "tabos", etc etc), but, i claim it bull from what i've talked with women about the issue and how ridicilous it is when thought about.

I've met my fair share of this also, and i've yet to meet a woman/argument to win my view. Almost every woman has had to acknowledge that i'm right in the facts that there's no equal rights, for men and that objectification is a woman thing and mostly due to jealousy *nod*

About giving and taking, sure, everything works like that, but in this case it's just a matter of illusions of grandture on womens behalf. Which, have to admit, is mostly because of "just p*ssy" chasing men.

Anyway! This is about puppies not about womens bullrights, we should move it back to puppies.
 

Rookiescot

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
816
Guy in my work said a true thing about women.
"If they didnt have fannies we would throw rocks at them. How can you trust something that bleeds for a week but doesnt die?"
 

Mojo

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Feb 27, 2004
Messages
1,940
Hooters would be better if the birds took off their tops and sucked cock while you were eating buffalo wings. Seen more skin down at the beach and I'm sure the feminist's bitch cos they is ugly, ever seen a hot feminist? I haven't.
 

Imgormiel

Part of the furniture
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
4,372
The knowledge depends on many issues(like you're a different agegroup, different culture, different women, different ways to spend youth, different "tabos", etc etc), but, i claim it bull from what i've talked with women about the issue and how ridicilous it is when thought about.

I've met my fair share of this also, and i've yet to meet a woman/argument to win my view. Almost every woman has had to acknowledge that i'm right in the facts that there's no equal rights, for men and that objectification is a woman thing and mostly due to jealousy *nod*

About giving and taking, sure, everything works like that, but in this case it's just a matter of illusions of grandture on womens behalf. Which, have to admit, is mostly because of "just p*ssy" chasing men.

Anyway! This is about puppies not about womens bullrights, we should move it back to puppies.


Heh, I note that from the puppies thang that you know something about women ;)
 

Sharma

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
4,678
Indeed.

Fuck the feminists, if they want to show their tits off then bloody well let them!

Demeaning my fucking arse, they chose to work there so I can look at their rack while they lean over and serve me my food!

I have a seething hatred for feminists, on the same level as chavs tbh - they're meat headed pointless group of people and they all look FUGLY. :D
 

Imgormiel

Part of the furniture
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
4,372
Indeed.

Fuck the feminists, if they want to show their tits off then bloody well let them!

Demeaning my fucking arse, they chose to work there so I can look at their rack while they lean over and serve me my food!

I have a seething hatred for feminists, on the same level as chavs tbh - they're meat headed pointless group of people and they all look FUGLY. :D

And usually not getting any because they are so opinionated etc. Btw Sharma, i saw some parmo items on Hooter's menu ;)
 

Imgormiel

Part of the furniture
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
4,372
take away their vote!! that'll teach em

Funny thing is, women in Chicago were really friendly not fiendly like they are here in the UK. You look at them and they stare back at you - you speak and you almost won because they love English guys.

Things are much different there, thus I want to be there (and for a whole host of other reasons) instead of being fucked around by prick teasers here in this country who think they god's gift to the earth and all else aint worth shit. I'd say American girls understand the whole process of pro-creation and it's need alot better than girls in the UK. The cities are much bigger and that doesn't necessarily mean that there is more opportunity for either sex.

It means that relationships must become more open if things are to stand a chance because of all that space and ethnicity if you want to throw that in for the bargain too. White people (sorry about this but this is QED and thus inarguable) are becoming increasingly rare in the US and will be a minority in the US by 2050, with the US estimated at getting a population of mixed ethinicity close to 600 million people (currently at 250 million) which is reported to be hinting at a large and dominant Hispanic population.

With this in mind that means that all White people in the US have to be more flexible in their approach to relationships or face being wiped off the US. I read somewhere that this trend will also happen here in the UK. I am not a racist, I believe these statements to be true. I like the idea of mixed race marriage and it's going to be part of the norm in just a decade or so. Race is still a very big issue in the US and they did ask about that subject and how the feelings are about it in the UK. Obviously I told them it was as I feel it is, race isn't an issue here, we are becoming more integrated and see each other as people that want to get along and that barrier as it were isn't an issue here. This view was taken as a refreshing change and I am glad I did that.

Thus why you find women to be more friendly in the US, (that is opinion and observation and not a statement of fact) there is a whole host of conflicting and dominating factors that are so different including lifestyles - unless you live in some rural part of the US which still manages to maintain some of the English traits of how relationships are perceived - but very few. Thus life in general is more competitive. You have to be more aggressive over there, if not then you sink without trait in minutes. Indeed, it's taken as the norm to be aggressive. Hmm did any of you know that it's possible to get pissed off and angry with peeps right in their face without punching their lights out and having it accepted that you are just pissed off? :p

I am sure there would be a moral issue presented here by some stiff upper lip women, but sorry girls. You don't play and yet you make all else pay. Fucked up logic imo and it's becoming more increasing NSFL(ife) - thus I am off at the soonest opportunity :flame:
 

Ezteq

Queen of OT
Joined
Jan 4, 2004
Messages
13,457
lol eating at hooters wouldnt fuss me, however if it was blokes serving food in skin tight pants i dont think i could face eating :sick: i mean imagine trying to scoff your chips with some dude waving his wang over them, ergh no ta...and i'd be dubious about ordering mayo tbh
 

Sharma

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
4,678
And usually not getting any because they are so opinionated etc. Btw Sharma, i saw some parmo items on Hooter's menu ;)

Wouldn't have been a parmo, would have been a Parma, similar thing but largely different. ;)
 

Rubric

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
2,145
lol eating at hooters wouldnt fuss me, however if it was blokes serving food in skin tight pants i dont think i could face eating :sick: i mean imagine trying to scoff your chips with some dude waving his wang over them, ergh no ta...and i'd be dubious about ordering mayo tbh


Would you like some mayo on your hooters ez?
 

Ezteq

Queen of OT
Joined
Jan 4, 2004
Messages
13,457
yeah and while your at it can you squirt some special sauce over my buns too please

Oh Matron!!!
 

Huntingtons

Resident Freddy
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
10,770
Go figure, it's only objectifying if it's a woman? Please.

who ever said that?

people dont find male nakedness an issue because we have alot of good benefits besides being smacking sexy. the problem for a feminist is that women often have to use their body solely to get through in society and thats why they find halfnakedness as a marketing stunt objectifying.

(that said i DO sincerely feel repelled by feminist - even tho, yes, i've seen hot ones!)
 

old.Tohtori

FH is my second home
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
45,210
who ever said that?

people dont find male nakedness an issue because we have alot of good benefits besides being smacking sexy. the problem for a feminist is that women often have to use their body solely to get through in society and thats why they find halfnakedness as a marketing stunt objectifying.

It was a continuation of my question towards women and their lack of discontent towards male nudity.

Victorias catalogue, sexism! Objectification! Owned by a woma...no wait....let's not say that.

But take a thing like, err, hunks? Well, any guy strip thing, and suddenly it's a-ok to flaunt that stuff about.

Those women who "have to" use their body to get through in society, are doing it because they are one, f*cking, thing:

Lazy.

I, actually, don't think feminism is an issue, or a problem, or feel one way or other about it, it's ANY woman, or MAN these days, preaching about sexism, equal rights and such, when infact it's the men who are usually getting the shaft. And not in that nice FH gay way.
 

Huntingtons

Resident Freddy
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
10,770
how exactly are we getting the shaft?
the only reason why a woman is using her body to get forth is because men allow it. and no - many women are forced to use their body as a mean of earing to their daily bread (not prostitution ). and what has a woman owning a catalogue to do with any sexism? all women care?
in denmark more sexual harassment at the work is happening, why? because sex is used as marketing and men feel confident that all females want to get groped all day long.
 

old.Tohtori

FH is my second home
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
45,210
how exactly are we getting the shaft?
the only reason why a woman is using her body to get forth is because men allow it. and no - many women are forced to use their body as a mean of earing to their daily bread (not prostitution ). and what has a woman owning a catalogue to do with any sexism? all women care?
in denmark more sexual harassment at the work is happening, why? because sex is used as marketing and men feel confident that all females want to get groped all day long.

That's exactly the kind of bull i'm talking about.

Men are getting the shaft, because, while women get more equal rights(some are good), we are still expected to behave and act towards women as we always did(disregarding the obvious). You need to be a gentleman, open doors, give seats, just as an example, and in no issue, have the mens position in this world been upped or "equalised". If you can give an example, i'm open to ehar one.

So a woman shags her boss to get a raise because his boss lets him? Right, that's a shift of blame if i ever saw one. Those who f*ck around to get ahead, dress like plumtarts to be noticed, do it for themselves because it's EASY, not because they can. If a man could whip out his dong and get a raise, there'd be plenty of d*ckwhippers out there, but still also those people who WORK for those same things.

The point about a omwan owning a catalogue, is that if women talk "this is sexist, men cr*p, men are pigs" and so forth, when the #1 catalogue drooled on is owned by a woman, means that women have f*ck all to complain about objectification, when their "own kind" is exploiting it to the fullest.

The men who think women like to be groped by men all the time, are NOT marketing victims, they are just sexstarving cavemen. Put the same guy, clone if you will, in a cave and one in a living room with sex on telly, and when you take 'em out a week later, and show a half-naked womans a**(which the WOMAN dressed in by FREE will), they'll both jump on it(if they are as sexhungry to begin with) at equal force. TV and media have nothing to blame for this. It's like blaming games for shootings, when infact the problem is elsewhere.

How about this. Don't dress up in high heels, push-up bras, short skirts, fishnet stockings and with a ton of make-up and THEN ocmplain when someone acts like that dress tells them to do.

Sure, women dress mostly for other women, mostly for themselves, but for the love of all that is puppies, if you expect to run around baretittied in the middle of the street without any men noticing, you're more dilusional then an open can of fosters saturday morning.

Don't get me wrong, equal rights, fine. No sexual harasment, fine. Women dressing up as they want, fine. But...big BUT and i cannot lie...don't expect to dress like the catalogue shows, and then expect the men not to notice.
 

Huntingtons

Resident Freddy
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
10,770
you talk as if you want no difference in the sex - while it is obvious there is, there is no need for worse treatment of a sex because we can. Yes it is the media which covers females as groping objects. men get twisted by that. if those men you are refering to were told from birth that females should be treated equally, they would have been but society (where they grew up) decided that it wasnt nescessary. its not genetic or evolutionary, its simple enviromental influences.
about females being forced to use their body. im not talking sexing the boss but rather females being forced to dress a certain way to erouse the male audience. some females enjoy it, fair enough but getting it tossed in your head daily on every corner (extreme examples) is not pleasing, myself i dislike it. Saw a Cult Shaker commercial in .DK where they used an ornamented breast and the product as ad. i do get repauls (sp?) me to see - this is partly what im talking about. even though some females chose it themselves doesnt mean we should accept it.

(are you saying that if a female dresses slutty she should be treated slutty?) (the exapmle with the magazine is really bad - men abuses human rights and torture molest so we shouldnt be complaining about it? somebody will always "exploit" things)
 

Mey

Part of the furniture
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Messages
4,252
ashley_judd-feminist.jpg


It's on a t-shirt must be a fact! FACT!
 

old.Tohtori

FH is my second home
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
45,210
1:you talk as if you want no difference in the sex - while it is obvious there is, there is no need for worse treatment of a sex because we can.

2: Yes it is the media which covers females as groping objects. men get twisted by that. if those men you are refering to were told from birth that females should be treated equally, they would have been but society (where they grew up) decided that it wasnt nescessary. its not genetic or evolutionary, its simple enviromental influences.

3: about females being forced to use their body. im not talking sexing the boss but rather females being forced to dress a certain way to erouse the male audience.

4: some females enjoy it, fair enough but getting it tossed in your head daily on every corner (extreme examples) is not pleasing, myself i dislike it. Saw a Cult Shaker commercial in .DK where they used an ornamented breast and the product as ad. i do get repauls (sp?) me to see - this is partly what im talking about. even though some females chose it themselves doesnt mean we should accept it.

5: (are you saying that if a female dresses slutty she should be treated slutty?) (the exapmle with the magazine is really bad - men abuses human rights and torture molest so we shouldnt be complaining about it? somebody will always "exploit" things)

1: I'm not saying we need complete equilibrium, i'm saying that while women get more and mroe, men have gotten NOTHING in equal rights. Semantic or judicial rights. My points had, in no way, any implication that other sex should be treated worse. Also, saying "women need to shut up about things or treat things equally as they ask us to do", doesn't mean "all should be/dress/act same"

2: I wasn't told from birth that women should be respected. I grew up in the same world as you and any sex offender. We had the same TV commercials, same women prancing about, same dressing ways and same things all around. Then how come, it can be, that it's the media that makes men grope a womans a**? True, it has a thing to do with where and how you grew up, but it can't, by any means, be blamed on the media.

3: Are you talking about TV? Are you talking about catalogues? Because in any working enviroment, or in any job at all, women aren't forced to dress in any way(unless it's a business place, then there's suits all around forced on people). That's the point. If you say "women need to dress this way to get ahead" and talk about TV shows, commercials, billboards, we're on a completely different matter altogether.

4: Fine, YOU don't like nudie commercials, or some other stuff like that, what has that got to do with this issue?

5: You completely undercut and misunderstood my point. No, women shouldn't be treated slutty if they dress slutty, but if a woman dresses slutty they should also realise that, those who DO act like the "cavemen", as in, those men who are grown as sexist pigs, WILL act more "aggressive" towards them. Like i said, it's not right, and yes, some men are complete pigs, but abusing women and molesting(fyi, what?!) has nothing to do with this discussion and ofcourse noone is for it or saying "we should let them".
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom