N
netcode
Guest
Is it only me, or have more and more ppl left midgard?
;( or even dont care about our front
;( or even dont care about our front
Originally posted by netcode
Is it only me, or have more and more ppl left midgard?
;( or even dont care about our front
Originally posted by netcode
We need more ppl to mid tbh!
Originally posted by akula
and is one of the older players on server
Funny to hear that from you.Originally posted by netcode
Is it only me, or have more and more ppl left midgard?
;( or even dont care about our front
guess the thane mentioned could have made 7 other lvls 50's in the time he's been guarding svas gates [/B]
Originally posted by Apathy
FotM classes have RvR, non-FoTM classes have...crafting and PvE.
a.
*
Originally posted by netcode
Is it only me, or have more and more ppl left midgard?
;( or even dont care about our front
Originally posted by harebear
yus fotm groups sucks and so do noobie mids, was sitting at mtk emain talking and i saw rr2 savages getting groups over rr6 zerker... there was some runie lfg for ages and no one would take him either. this is the way rvr on mid has been going for a long time now and it really sucks :|
Originally posted by vintervargen
if only mids would try SM grps more, which opens up a totally new rvr style. but since you might actually DIE when you do that, i except it not to happend.
Originally posted by vintervargen
if only mids would try SM grps more, which opens up a totally new rvr style. but since you might actually DIE when you do that, i except it not to happend.
Originally posted by vintervargen
but since no mid leet rvr guild can take a loss (read jh np atrocity), nor can the individuals in those guilds, you got the "must have uberest leetest grp setup" attitude.
omgOriginally posted by vintervargen
mid rvr is what you make of it
but since no mid leet rvr guild can take a loss (read jh np atrocity), nor can the individuals in those guilds, you got the "must have uberest leetest grp setup" attitude.
big reasons most hibs are pretty satified with life in the magic realm, is that we got many fg setups that do good in rvr.
if only mids would try SM grps more, which opens up a totally new rvr style. but since you might actually DIE when you do that, i except it not to happend.
Originally posted by deadkid
Hibs go as FotM, Albs go as FotM, Mids go as FotM... go as FotM or quit... there is no other way to win in this game... special offer to those who likes to lose tho
Originally posted by vintervargen
big reasons most hibs are pretty satified with life in the magic realm, is that we got many fg setups that do good in rvr.
Originally posted by Kallio
But really, I dont see many champs in RvR really, why dont hibs use them?
baod *cough* *cough*Originally posted by vintervargen
mid rvr is what you make of it
but since no mid leet rvr guild can take a loss (read jh np atrocity), nor can the individuals in those guilds, you got the "must have uberest leetest grp setup" attitude.
big reasons most hibs are pretty satified with life in the magic realm, is that we got many fg setups that do good in rvr.
if only mids would try SM grps more, which opens up a totally new rvr style. but since you might actually DIE when you do that, i except it not to happend.
Originally posted by vintervargen
mid rvr is what you make of it
but since no mid leet rvr guild can take a loss (read jh np atrocity), nor can the individuals in those guilds, you got the "must have uberest leetest grp setup" attitude.
big reasons most hibs are pretty satified with life in the magic realm, is that we got many fg setups that do good in rvr.
if only mids would try SM grps more, which opens up a totally new rvr style. but since you might actually DIE when you do that, i except it not to happend.
Originally posted by Rulke-RM
That anyone can get so bitter and hateful over a game is worrying tbh