GTA VI

[Overdriven]

 

[MYstIC G]

Interesting to see if that's the in game or just cut scenes

 

[Overdriven]

Physical Edition doesn't come with a physical disk... Lol

 

[BloodOmen]

£100 for the ultimate edition, they can fuck off quite frankly. Even the base edition of £80 which has shit missing from it can fuck off.

Greedy cunts. Some U.S Retailers are refusing to stock it as it does not come with physical media and goes against their rules.

 

[Overdriven]

£70 for standard, but still.

Story content locked behind Ultimate is a fucking scam though.

 

[Billargh]

£100 for the ultimate edition, they can fuck off quite frankly. Even the base edition of £80 which has shit missing from it can fuck off.

Greedy cunts. Some U.S Retailers are refusing to stock it as it does not come with physical media and goes against their rules.

Good on them, physical releases that are just a code in a box, or just a disc with a 25Mb installer on shouldn't exist.

 

[BloodOmen]

unconfirmed but rumoured that it doesn't include the online part either, people reckon they're going to sell the online part separate.

 

[MYstIC G]

Yeah, they can get to fuck over paywalled map areas

 

[Overdriven]

Rumours have it that they're releasing physical with disks in December..

Scummy that you can't buy it digitally as a pre-order from R" and then have them send you a physical copy with the actual disc later..

 

[BloodOmen]

It'll not fail but I hope it doesn't hit their goals to teach them a lesson for their greed.

 

[Overdriven]

They're going to smash goals because no one not retarded doesn't give a shit.

(Aka: Everyone outside of Reddit)

 

[Scouse]

Yeah, they can get to fuck over paywalled map areas

That sucks.

But then, we live in a world where people will pay £120/month+ just so they can watch Premier League footie.

 

[Overdriven]

Extended trailer not by a crypto scammer is out tonight/tomorrow on YT remember.

 

[Overdriven]

Looks good. Some DLSS/Render issues in certain scenes they've shown but considering it was 26 min of basically (95%) un-pre-rendered gameplay footage it looks good.

 

[Embattle]

View: https://youtu.be/tJbzMqJGH4k?si=Tupqf1egm3DjCAgf

 

[Embattle]

View: https://youtu.be/rz1B4B2yBZY?si=C_ZhlGLu04Vu9fBV

 

[caLLous]

Rumours that it'll be a Q1 2027 release for the PC version so hopefully not that much time to steadfastly avoid any videos/reviews/etc before being able to play it.

 

[BloodOmen]

Rumours that it'll be a Q1 2027 release for the PC version so hopefully not that much time to steadfastly avoid any videos/reviews/etc before being able to play it.

Given how jail broken the PS5 is atm I wouldn't be surprised if Rockstar rush it out of the door for PC to get sales before people emulate it as the PS5's library is almost 100% playable on PC thanks to AI.

 

[Overdriven]

Given how jail broken the PS5 is atm I wouldn't be surprised if Rockstar rush it out of the door for PC to get sales before people emulate it as the PS5's library is almost 100% playable on PC thanks to AI.

Hopefully those doing the ripping aren't doing it with Claude coz that's now not happening.

I ordered standard edition on the PS5 - £100 PSN credit for £70 thanks to a forgotten about paypal credit and 5% off.

 

[BloodOmen]

LOL

Capped at 30 FPS for all consoles

$100 game... 30 FPS.... get fucked.

 

[Overdriven]

Who cares?

Single player non-competitive game. RDR2 was 30fps.

I'm going to play it and just enjoy it.

 

[Scouse]

Who cares?

I would. It's one of the reasons I've never bought a console - 30fps hurts my eyes.

I booted up a game yesterday and recoiled at the poverty-level 60fps it was set at. Genuine "urgh!" moment before I whacked my refresh rate back to 144hz.

But @BloodOmen is wrong to blame the game - it's console limitations that are the problem.

 

[BloodOmen]

Who cares?

Single player non-competitive game. RDR2 was 30fps.

I'm going to play it and just enjoy it.

If I'm paying $100 for a game I'm sure as hell not going to accept anything less than 60 FPS, don't defend them for giving you less while they want you to pay more.

 

[BloodOmen]

I would. It's one of the reasons I've never bought a console - 30fps hurts my eyes.

I booted up a game yesterday and recoiled at the poverty-level 60fps it was set at. Genuine "urgh!" moment before I whacked my refresh rate back to 144hz.

But @BloodOmen is wrong to blame the game - it's console limitations that are the problem.

Doubtful, they said the same about previous generation games then were proven wrong when people managed to jailbreak the PS4 and uncap the FPS, it ran games perfectly fine above 30FPS.

 

[Scouse]

If I'm paying $100 for a game I'm sure as hell not going to accept anything less than 60 FPS, don't defend them for giving you less while they want you to pay more.

It's a hardware limitation.

Should they make a fugly game? They know that this will be about for at least the next generation of hardware. They also know that they're going to release it on PC - which will be absolutely fine running the fucker at 120fps in 4k.

Look at your console. Realise it's a piece of shit, and hate that...