Global Warming strikes again!

Jeros

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
1,983
I would argue its a soft science much like economics or psychology - the reason I would link the three is because they all deal with complex subjects which can never be reduced to single factors and are thus not great for traditional experimentation.

What you tend to get are correlations - often quite weak ones that people have jumped to big conclusions from.

Psychology is tough because the human mind really is complex and you can never really isolate behaviour down to one cause.

Economics again is a set of massively complex factors - if an economists prediction ever comes true its generally a fluke :p

You have absolutely no idea of the subject then.

I am doing Geology myself which is an earth science. It consists of mathematics, chemistry, physics, geophysics and biology. The social impacts are secondary to the hard science.

I dare you to go up to a maths, chem, physics or bio student or professor and say they are part of a soft science

I DARE you!
 

rynnor

Rockhound
Moderator
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
9,353
Its also filled to the brim of very average scientists on an easy grant, all they need to do is agree that its happening and they get money thrown at them, its human nature.

I dont think its that bad but it became clear that linking your work to Global Warming lead to a much better chance of being published in decent journals (which is pretty much the aim of all scientists) and that would naturally tend to skew things.

Humans are prone to fashions in all things and Science is no exception.
 

rynnor

Rockhound
Moderator
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
9,353
You have absolutely no idea of the subject then.

I am doing Geology myself which is an earth science. It consists of mathematics, chemistry, physics, geophysics and biology. The social impacts are secondary to the hard science.

So what - the claims all come from trying to stretch principles established in proper sciences so as to fit a climate theory.

Pretty much everything we ever do has a grounding in Physics since it attempts to explain the material universe :p

It still all comes down to trying to apply a finding from classical physics (the greenhouse effect) to a massively complex system like the climate.
 

Jeros

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
1,983
So what - the claims all come from trying to stretch principles established in proper sciences so as to fit a climate theory.

Thats amazingly insulting to anyone learning or working in Geosciences, like you know, the nice people who explain how to make buildings resistant to earthquakes or why its a bad idea to drink from certain waters. But whatever, believe what you want to believe.

Pretty much everything we ever do has a grounding in Physics since it attempts to explain the material universe :p

It still all comes down to trying to apply a finding from classical physics (the greenhouse effect) to a massively complex system like the climate.

Yes it is massively complex, and we will never have all the answers, however what we CAN do is look at the evidence, look at the earths past through Geology, and see that something is amiss.

People don't seem to grasp who fragile the system is, hell if enough volcanoes went off at once we could be wiped out. The records are all there, in the rocks below, frozen in time, from long before we were around.

But as has already been stated in this thread, we are fucked anyway, we are just speeding things up.
 

rynnor

Rockhound
Moderator
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
9,353
Thats amazingly insulting to anyone learning or working in Geosciences, like you know, the nice people who explain how to make buildings resistant to earthquakes or why its a bad idea to drink from certain waters. But whatever, believe what you want to believe.

Lol - if you want to tar all the earth sciences with the brush of climatology failure be my guest but its a big stretch from my comments but you seem determined to be a martyr :p
 

Jeros

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
1,983
Lol - if you want to tar all the earth sciences with the brush of climatology failure be my guest but its a big stretch from my comments but you seem determined to be a martyr :p

Well that was the impression you gave, i did ask you in regards to "Earth Science"
 

Jail Bait

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
May 5, 2010
Messages
163
Co2 is not bad because plants grow better when Co2 is higher (greenhouses add Co2)

It can get much warmer before I start complaining

It is the sun...... Stupid
 

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
45,217
The problem is we are destroying the CO2>O2 power houses, the rainforests and the greenland to make room for low carbon fuel and "sustainable" housing. Its a crock of shit. Governments are making it worse by pandering to privately funded science that tells them to clear more land, build more houses and plant more expensive and virtually energy useless plants. Biofuels are causing food shortages and forcing food prices up, they decimate the natural habitat of a huge variety of plants and animals. There is a lot of things unknown about most plants in the forests, new drugs and cures are often found but we are flushing it all away in the hope of reversing something that may or may not be caused by us.

The one and only way we will halt humanities affect on global warming is to control our population, that's not going to happen.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,442
I wouldn't listen to rynnor, Jeros. He's not done a seconds worth of science in his life.

Well, maybe some gh3y "combined science" course at GCSE, but that's about it :)
 

Jail Bait

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
May 5, 2010
Messages
163
The problem is we are destroying the CO2>O2 power houses, the rainforests and the greenland to make room for low carbon fuel and "sustainable" housing. Its a crock of shit. Governments are making it worse by pandering to privately funded science that tells them to clear more land, build more houses and plant more expensive and virtually energy useless plants. Biofuels are causing food shortages and forcing food prices up, they decimate the natural habitat of a huge variety of plants and animals. There is a lot of things unknown about most plants in the forests, new drugs and cures are often found but we are flushing it all away in the hope of reversing something that may or may not be caused by us.
You live in the city don't you ..... you Tree hugger

The one and only way we will halt humanities affect on global warming is to control our population, that's not going to happen.
Begin the cull with yourself
 

Jeros

Part of the furniture
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
1,983
Co2 is not bad because plants grow better when Co2 is higher (greenhouses add Co2)

It can get much warmer before I start complaining

It is the sun...... Stupid

However plants give OFF Co2 when under temperature or water based strain.

I cant remember the reason off hand tho.
 

rynnor

Rockhound
Moderator
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
9,353
I wouldn't listen to rynnor, Jeros. He's not done a seconds worth of science in his life.

Well, maybe some gh3y "combined science" course at GCSE, but that's about it :)

Ah - where have you been all my life Mr Ad Hominem attacker :p

Cheap as usual mr scouse - pretty much as I've come to expect.
 

Talyn

Can't get enough of FH
Joined
Dec 31, 2003
Messages
608
Looks like Brian Cox annoyed a few people -

Apparently, if you say climate change skeptics are nobbers, you get loads of angry tweets :)

From his Twitter feed...
 

Bodhi

Once agreed with Scouse and a LibDem at same time
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
9,381
Looks like Brian Cox annoyed a few people -



From his Twitter feed...


But that sounds quite plausible. If you act as sanctimoniously as your typical Climate Change Fanboy, most normal people will get upset and start calling you an AIDS ridden faggot. Especially if the personal crusade the sanctimoniuos one gets very rich from makes the rest of us poor cost we have to pay 1.20 a litre for something we need TO GET TO FUCKING WORK.

Cox, Monbiot etc, all ***** of the highest order. Spending the next 40 years of their lives getting buttraped by Ronaldus Jerimius in prison then the rest of eternity with Satan doing the same thing would be too good for them. Socialist *****.
 

Scouse

Giant Thundercunt
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2003
Messages
37,442
Lol. You intellectually agree with the balance of science, the evidence of which says climate change is real, and you are labelled a socalist *somethingbad* by Bodhi!

Religious objection much? You 'nobber' :p

;)
 

Assi

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
May 5, 2010
Messages
21
If only there was a way to cap those nasty volcanoes. They really hate the planet.

Perhaps we could convince a certain group of people to jump in and fill these evil unnatural craters of lava.

I don't know who would possibly be gullable to kill themselves for something like saving the Earth, but if we said every person who jumped into a volcano got 72 virgins......
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom