Shovel
Can't get enough of FH
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 1,350
A competition I just invented. Nominate a maximum of two sites that you rate highly for their overall design. There's no restriction on them being business sites or personal sites, just need to be something special.
There's nothing official about this, but here's the criteria I considered when making my choice:
And all that Malarkey
I've never, ever seen a design like it. It's a personal site, but visually inspired by print magazine design. The entire site is in valid XHTML and CSS and pretty much by implication is extremely accessible on all counts.
Better yet, it pushes the limits of CSS support in modern web browsers. To view the site in full-colour glory you need to use Firefox, Opera, Safari or any other current, standards compliant browser. If you visit using IE6 or below, however, you actually get a completely different (and technically simpler) design.
The design doesn't get altered using script or browser sniffing, it all happens using advanced CSS selectors to apply different styles to newer supporting browsers, and using some known bugs to apply different styles only to IE. It's seamless.
So, for producing two aesthetically awesome designs using web standards and experimenting with some truely bleeding edge techniques for graceful degredation, I would give an award to And all that Malarkey.
I should stress that you can learn a huge, huge, huge amount by reading around that site, too. He's a clever guy and all.
Right then, your turn.
There's nothing official about this, but here's the criteria I considered when making my choice:
- Unique appearance
- Web Standards compliance
- Accessibility (with regards to disabled net users and preferential keyboard navigation)
- Pushing of the envelope
And all that Malarkey
I've never, ever seen a design like it. It's a personal site, but visually inspired by print magazine design. The entire site is in valid XHTML and CSS and pretty much by implication is extremely accessible on all counts.
Better yet, it pushes the limits of CSS support in modern web browsers. To view the site in full-colour glory you need to use Firefox, Opera, Safari or any other current, standards compliant browser. If you visit using IE6 or below, however, you actually get a completely different (and technically simpler) design.
The design doesn't get altered using script or browser sniffing, it all happens using advanced CSS selectors to apply different styles to newer supporting browsers, and using some known bugs to apply different styles only to IE. It's seamless.
So, for producing two aesthetically awesome designs using web standards and experimenting with some truely bleeding edge techniques for graceful degredation, I would give an award to And all that Malarkey.
I should stress that you can learn a huge, huge, huge amount by reading around that site, too. He's a clever guy and all.
Right then, your turn.