Fao: Rambo

[lissandra]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fao: Rambo

Originally posted by Puppetmistress
Hahaahahahaha, I quit reading here.

Well u should read the rest then, if im owerpowered then we really should start with nerfing paladins, mercs etc aswell as me since i have no chance against a merc (considered hes good enough to press that DT button , nah they do very nice damage with almost impossible defence to hit through) and paladins are a pain in the ass to hit at all But all high defensive tanks are hard for h2h, like hrodelbert that i lost to when i was buffed and he was not, i admit he used ip and i didnt have it up but any class that can beat a buffed char with only using like 120% health is very good against the buffed char.

 

[Flesh]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fao: Rambo

Originally posted by Puppetmistress
Hahaahahahaha, I quit reading here.

Does that mean you'll quit posting to?
If so..BYE!

 

[Puppetmistress]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fao: Rambo

Originally posted by lissandra
Well u should read the rest then, if im owerpowered then we really should start with nerfing paladins, mercs etc aswell as me since i have no chance against a merc (considered hes good enough to press that DT button , nah they do very nice damage with almost impossible defence to hit through) and paladins are a pain in the ass to hit at all But all high defensive tanks are hard for h2h, like hrodelbert that i lost to when i was buffed and he was not, i admit he used ip and i didnt have it up but any class that can beat a buffed char with only using like 120% health is very good against the buffed char.

Hmmm. I guess you dont understand why alot of complaints are being fired towards the savage and why we call it overpowered.

Duels have nothing to do with it.

It is the immense offensive power/dmg-output unleeched on our supportclasses killing them in a few seconds.

A normal tank takes abit more time to kill a supportclass and can be easily slammed.

A savage has an incredible offensive and an incredible defense. That is wrong with it.

Ofcourse you do not do good in duels versus highly defensive shield-tanks when you have to rely on positionals. LOL.


CLASS BALANCE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH DUELS OR HOW GOOD YOU CAN KILL TANKS.

 

[lissandra]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fao: Rambo

Originally posted by Puppetmistress
Ofcourse you do not do good in duels versus highly defensive shield-tanks when you have to rely on positionals. LOL.

Guess you dont know so much about savages, the h2h ones have very nice reactionaries, parry chain and evade chain and the back style with 4 sec stun is easy to get in in a 1on1. I dont rely on positionals in 1on1, its the evadechain that really does damage. But you are right, duels dont mean squat.

 

[Ithurts]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Fao: Rambo

Originally posted by Puppetmistress
Hmmm. I guess you dont understand why alot of complaints are being fired towards the savage and why we call it overpowered.

Duels have nothing to do with it.

It is the immense offensive power/dmg-output unleeched on our supportclasses killing them in a few seconds.

A normal tank takes abit more time to kill a supportclass and can be easily slammed.

A savage has an incredible offensive and an incredible defense. That is wrong with it.

Ofcourse you do not do good in duels versus highly defensive shield-tanks when you have to rely on positionals. LOL.


CLASS BALANCE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH DUELS OR HOW GOOD YOU CAN KILL TANKS.

Don't listen to him, he's a liar