Evade cap vs multiple opponents

A

andyr00barb

Guest
Assuming an assassin uses decent buffs and gets dex over 300 and quick over 200. Will you hit the evade cap vs one opponent with stats like that? Also, does dodger increase chance of evade against multiple opponents (attacking from the front ofc) if you'd otherwise hit the evade cap against a single opponent without it?

Cheers..
 
S

Serdan

Guest
Originally posted by andyr00barb
Assuming an assassin uses decent buffs and gets dex over 300 and quick over 200. Will you hit the evade cap vs one opponent with stats like that? Also, does dodger increase chance of evade against multiple opponents (attacking from the front ofc) if you'd otherwise hit the evade cap against a single opponent without it?

Cheers..

From Herald we know:

Evade formula includes such elements as your level, your target's level, your level of evade, your QUI, your DEX, your buffs to QUI and DEX, the number of people attacking you, your target's weapon level, your target's spec in the weapon he is wielding, the kind of attack (DW, range, etc), attack radius, angle of attack, the style you used most recently, target's offensive RA, debuffs, and a few others. (The type of weapon – large, 1H, etc – doesn’t matter.) So it's entirely situational.
Base chance to evade at Evade 7 is 35% (5% per level). Dodger 5 (3% per level) adds another 15%. But that's just a BASE. Those percentages can be modified by all of the above. The cap is 50% - but after your base is modified, you might not be at 50.

Grab Bag 12/13/02



Exact DEX/QUI modifier for Evade is unknow, but from different estimations it should in range of 3-10(unlikely)%. This means that assasin will not hit the cap without at least dodger2 even fully buffed.
Multiple attackers reduce your chance to evade by some highly secret value, as well as all the stuff listed above.

So you can be at cap against single enemy, but well below one against full group of RR9.
 
A

andyr00barb

Guest
Cheers for that. Think I'm off to get dodger.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom