milou
Part of the furniture
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 628
You wouldn't do the Moon landings the same way though; you'd build facilities with robots first and try to go for a sustainable colony, so you can't really look at the costs of the 1960s as a template.
Exactly. Also NASA is pushing to get a lot of their services from small private space corporations these days and you can't compare the costs involved with those business to that of a government funded monolithic entity. I wouldn't be surprised if the next person to walk on the moon isn't actually part of a government funded space agency.
I'm surprised he hung up. The nuts I've heard who still believe it today despite that annoying thing called "logic" (mirrors? bah!) say it was obviously only the first moon landing that was faked in case it went wrong on live TV.
I didn't go to Sunday School, but I don't think the Jewish-Christian bibles go large on extra-terrestrial life...
They were discussing this on the radio this afternoon. There are roughly 300 billion stars in our galaxy alone. There are billions of galaxies. There are billions of planets. And we're supposed to be the only intelligent life in the universe? Crazy.
And beside the Chinese could do moon landings it for the fraction of the cost
Apparently, a repeat of the moon landing missions* would cost ~$750bn in todays money. So, a lot lot less than it's taken to bail out the banks.
The reason we're not going is political choice. And a poor one at that IMO.
*i.e. repeated landings and retrievals.
The stupid thing is that humans still think with money. It's as silly as religion to you, even if evidence shows that working together would benefit all of us.