Ormorof
FH is my second home
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 9,887
SilverHood said:Gorr would probably kill me for saying this, but I wouldn't trust my life to a Shaman healer
ah yes but youre a priest, so you would have biased views
SilverHood said:Gorr would probably kill me for saying this, but I wouldn't trust my life to a Shaman healer
Could possibly be because most of the Druid spells are "Over Time" spells. That includes most of the heals, since the druid is a bit more active.Vantros of the Delerium said:could heal for 1k - 1.5k at lvl 35 very often, not seen druid of that lvl manage that..
BTW whos testing and where??
Abel said:I read it on a Pro vs Con priest description on www.worldofwarcraft.net, which embarrasingly enough seems to be gone now from the site ...
If I remember it correctly it said not that druids could outheal priests in raw number of hitpoints/time, but rather hitpoints/used mana. In other words : druids are supposed to heal slightly more economically, when they use up all their mana they'll have healed more then a priest, albeit over a longer period of time.
People who have played a healer char in previous games will know that not only raw healing power matters, but also the ability to sustain healing over time.
Anyhow, anyone who has played both classes to high lvl and can compare both their healing capabilities ?
Phusion said:that is not totally true, a druid has far LESS mana then a priest. they might heal a bit more economical, but priests can do far more heals with the mana they and thus heal more Oo