Vladamir said:Noticed quite a few of these recently and i'm feeling a little uneducated as to why. Can anyone explain please?
Thanks :]
Blackjack said:It's because of the drawings published in the danish paper.
People have Denmark avatar. Not to support Denmark as such. But Free speech in general.
People support Denmark, not because the necessarily agree with the publishing of those images but because they feel we had a right to do so. And that islamic countries shouldn't go nuts in an attempt to censor a paper published half way around the globe.
We have become a "symbol" of the freedom of speech vs censorship battle that sprung up as a result of the drawings.
Blackjack said:It's because of the drawings published in the danish paper.
People have Denmark avatars. Not to support Denmark as such. But Free speech in general.
People support Denmark, not because they necessarily agree with the publishing of those images but because they feel we had a right to do so. And that islamic countries shouldn't go nuts in an attempt to censor a paper published half way around the globe.
We have become a "symbol" of the freedom of speech vs censorship battle that sprung up as a result of the drawings.
Blackjack said:We have become a "symbol" of the freedom of speech vs censorship battle that sprung up as a result of the drawings.
old.Tohtori said:Quoting it, but not commenting on it because...we allready have a thread about this. Might say something nasty right now.
But also stating...*cough*...
...BULLSHIT!
Bahumat said:the funny thing is we (uk) never showed it on tv nor in the papers iirc yet we will get the most riots etc, is their many muslims in denmark? cant imagine you got many ppl QQ'ing in Denmark?
There is a difference between what a large news paper publishes to provoke muslims and what some random people draws for a riot in jakarta.Ashala said:its true, we dont really feel it that much here in denmark, but pictures like this, really makes me wonder why we should apologize about what some dane drew
![]()
imagion what would happen if it was a muhammed being kicked and asked to "go to hell"
but i guess this is ok....
not to mention all the building that were destroyed by enraged muslims, recon we should apologize for that aswell then
It is perfectly legal to brun the danish flag in denmark as a part of freedom of speech...Thadius said:Funny thing is, they whine about Muhammed being used this way
Wait a minute, isnt the Danish flag a cross? And doesnt a cross on a flag mean that it was a Christian country back in the Dark Age of Crusadalot?
Ps, why have just an avatar?
http://www.bnp.org.uk/shopping/merchandise/item.php?id=589
Chap said:There is a difference between what a large news paper publishes to provoke muslims and what some random people draws for a riot in jakarta.
Like 80% of FH generalize towards muslims, but I guess thats ok...
![]()
This is from the war that we in Denmark are apart of in coalition with american and english troops.
Dont think we need to apologize as the poor kid will prolly die, but I guess thats ok...
It's perfectly legal to draw the cartoons too...Chap said:It is perfectly legal to brun the danish flag in denmark as a part of freedom of speech...
That is were you maybe wrong. We have a racism paragraf which sounds like this:Tasslehoff said:It's perfectly legal to draw the cartoons too...
And imo if you draw muhammed with a bomb in his turban its a degradation to all muslims in general and to Islam, so hopefully this will protect any further unnecessary provokations.Straffeloven § 266b said:Den, der offentligt eller med forsæt til udbredelse i en videre kreds fremsætter udtalelse eller anden meddelelse, ved hvilken en gruppe af personer trues, forhånes eller nedværdiges på grund af sin race, hudfarve, nationale eller etniske oprindelse, tro eller seksuelle orientering, straffes med bøde eller fængsel indtil 2 år.
So you say that the aggression in muslim countries has absolutely nothing to with the war in Iraq. That is abit naive imo.Ashala said:im not saying that is ok, but your not staying on the subject, this is about the cartoon and the things that followed because of that....NOT the war in iraq or any other war for that matter, so go make a FH thread about that if you wonna discuss it, but leave it out of this thread
Chap said:And imo if you draw muhammed with a bomb in his turban its a degradation to all muslims in general and to Islam, so hopefully this will protect any further unnecessary provokations.
Yeah I agree, but the whole point is we dont see these pictures in the western medias because it has violent content and thats when we forget what is happening.eggy said:Chap there is no need to post direct pictures like that on here. At least give a link and a disclaimer saying it's graphic violent content.
Chap said:we dont see these pictures in the western medias
Chap said:So you say that the aggression in muslim countries has absolutely nothing to with the war in Iraq. That is abit naive imo.
Chap said:So you say that the aggression in muslim countries has absolutely nothing to with the war in Iraq. That is abit naive imo.
Good, I'm glad we don't.
Blackjack said:Interesting, you are in a combative mood today Toh, lets hear it then.
What do you find to be bullshit?![]()
Yes burning embassies is EXACTLY what freedom of speech is all about, thank you Teh Seel for clarifying that.old.Tohtori said:Oh i am. Tired of taking crap really
I find, to be bullshit, the premantioned line of "supporters for freedom of speach" to be an ironic, even hypocrite, way of thinking as in supporting denmark, you are saying that muslims should not riot over this, ergo, using their freedom of speach.
So...
*cough*
Bullshiet.