DAoC Origins - How to

[old.Tohtori]

tohtori discussion, cba to read - even though it includes bugz

Actually, i've been very nice this year

Aaand another thread turned into crap by yours truly... (yeah, you!) I know its "Off Topic" forum, but get a fuuucking clue. You argue like 13 y/o chavs on Vent..

To be honest we did stop it after it got into too much OT, the thread was answered as such(so why make another) and we had a proper discussion and not a slugfest.

Unless you mean someone else

 

[Zebolt]

Hmm.. givf

 

[old.Tohtori]

To be fair, you have no idea if that's true or not :>

To a debatable ratio, it is

 

[Zebolt]

To a debatable ratio, it is

Well how can anyone ever know if they have a limit? If you eat only meat and nothing else til the day you die, perhaps someday your taste will change. You don't know and will never know :>

 

[old.Tohtori]

Well how can anyone ever know if they have a limit? If you eat only meat and nothing else til the day you die, perhaps someday your taste will change. You don't know and will never know :>

Yeah i agree on the impossibility of that, but that's semantics really.

You can't prove anything to a definition of eternal.

 

[Zebolt]

Indeed.

Anyway, I wanna go back to 2003 or something and play

 

[pikeh]

a Toht/Bugz Argue thread wouldn't be the same without Toht using the word 'Semantics'

 

[old.Tohtori]

Who's arguing!

Only people ruining it is you lot

We had a nice discussion, polite and all and then people come with...bah!

*storms off*

 

[WiZe^]

Talk to a GM on daoc-origins, there betatesting the server atm, but eta was 2-3 weeks, kinda cool server, only pre SI classes, old RA's, 75 cap etc! rly old school stuff