Currently on pendagron. Hold your breath!

AngelHeal

Part of the furniture
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
3,757
tbh its very ez to kill a sm nowadays

just /duel challenge him with ur warlock.. :>

edit : ow a tank... hmm i guess a mincer can, just mezz pet, zephyr it away and keel the nice sm
 

Carter

Banned
Joined
Jan 15, 2006
Messages
74
AngelHeal said:
tbh its very ez to kill a sm nowadays

just /duel challenge him with ur warlock.. :>

edit : ow a tank... hmm i guess a mincer can, just mezz pet, zephyr it away and keel the nice sm

so mincers are classified as tanks nowadays, much has changed :m00:
 

Raven

Fuck the Tories!
FH Subscriber
Joined
Dec 27, 2003
Messages
44,966
AngelHeal said:
tbh its very ez to kill a sm nowadays

just /duel challenge him with ur warlock.. :>

edit : ow a tank... hmm i guess a mincer can, just mezz pet, zephyr it away and keel the nice sm
solo SMs are easy pickings as a warlord, most of them are to stupid to try and get away from you, not expecting that the bugged intercept isnt working. they dont notice thier pet has fucked off without them.
 

Flimgoblin

It's my birthday today!
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
8,324
sounds like a bug that unfortunately :(

(i.e. the brittle guard nuking code applying to the SM pets - maybe they'll remove the intercept and give them a nuke instead ;))
 

Isunder

Fledgling Freddie
Joined
Dec 14, 2004
Messages
68
Flimgoblin said:
sounds like a bug that unfortunately :(

(i.e. the brittle guard nuking code applying to the SM pets - maybe they'll remove the intercept and give them a nuke instead ;))

Well yes if pa kills the pet and does full damage to the caster. There is always the slim chance that Mythic finally realised that a pet being able to intercept pa was just a tad overpowered and were trying to make sm pets unable to intercept pa only, erm by just applying brittle code to sm pet, yeah right ;) Didn't read the thread (edit: thought someone posted a vnboards link, guess not), wonder if anyone has tried pa'ing a necro shade.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom