Crysis: Realistic Graphics vs Real Life :)

[Joor]

What is reality and what are graphics? :worthy:

 

[Nate]

Looks pretty good 2nd ones the worst imo.

 

[Overdriven]

Right - Left - Left = IRL, I think

 

[Jeros]

Wow, we have come so far since the days i was moving a square with a arrow (the arrow was teh sword!) around a maze on my old atari

 

[Solo]

Right - Left - Left = IRL, I think

You are joking right?

 

[Ctuchik]

What is reality and what are graphics? :worthy:

all the left ones are the photos i think. the others doesent look right for some reason... then again, the pictures are so small theres no real chance to actually compare the 2...

 

[Joor]

All pictures to the left are from real life...its just amazing how well they made this crysis gfx engine.

 

[Ctuchik]

All pictures to the left are from real life...its just amazing how well they made this crysis gfx engine.

aye. actually had me fooled for a few minutes until i really started to look at them.... its just really really small things that i was able to tell them aparty with, and even then i was never 100% certain.

 

[Overdriven]

Not my fault I thought the twig on the first photo looked a little drawn =(


Though on a closer look aye, all left are IRL.

 

[old.Tohtori]

Middle one is not too good, but the others, dang.

Stills are rather easy fools though, hopefully it's the same in motion

the problem with the middle is that it lacks the clouds and the tree at the end is not in a good place. Also, too sharp edges, but that's just a lack of blur.

 

[fl3a]

thats the deal with game graphics, it doesnt look that good in motion, but crysis engine has depth of field and a great motion blur sistem, which will help keep that feeling of photorealism even in moton

 

[Coldbeard]

Impressive!

 

[Vodkai]

Give me good gameplay over graphics any day..

 

[kirennia]

Give me good gameplay over graphics any day..

Good gameplay with good graphics >>>> Good gameplay with bad graphics though.

Graphical improvements are always a step in the right direction so long as it doesn't add time to production of games. Otherwise companies wouldn't favour it over something easy to make a quick buck on. EA for example are the worst for doing this. When did they, the biggest current games creators last make anything revolutionary This year, 26 titles announced, of which, 25 are sequels...lol

This is why I'd favour crysis over EA anyday of the week, so long as they don't end up being bought up by them like some other money grabbing companies which watched their games go down the pan did...

 

[DocWolfe]

Good gameplay with good graphics >>>> Good gameplay with bad graphics though.

Graphical improvements are always a step in the right direction so long as it doesn't add time to production of games. Otherwise companies wouldn't favour it over something easy to make a quick buck on. EA for example are the worst for doing this. When did they, the biggest current games creators last make anything revolutionary This year, 26 titles announced, of which, 25 are sequels...lol

This is why I'd favour crysis over EA anyday of the week, so long as they don't end up being bought up by them like some other money grabbing companies which watched their games go down the pan did...

Hate to break it to you mate...

http://www.electronicarts.co.uk/games/8456/

lol.... since 2004

 

[Succi]

Right - Left - Left = IRL, I think

lol, take a trip to the opticians

 

[Ctuchik]

Hate to break it to you mate...

http://www.electronicarts.co.uk/games/8456/

lol.... since 2004

i so wanted to say anything other then "pwnt" but i cant

 

[Ctuchik]

lol, take a trip to the opticians

easy to say that when the answer is already there and he only had 1 wrong. thats really nothing to complain about.

 

[kirennia]

Hate to break it to you mate...

http://www.electronicarts.co.uk/games/8456/

lol.... since 2004

Heh, I never knew, oh well . Farcry when bought out was one of the best revolutions in AI in this type of game I'd seen in a while. I really hope that EA having taken over since*, wont make it worse then it looks because it looks very promising. If the AI which was their best bit hasn't been built on, I'll be mighty disappointed

On a side note, will this mean we'll be seeing crysisart2 revolutions or something in a few months after the release EA style to suck more money from it?!

* - Actually had to check this otherwise I would of had to say EA created something original! hehe. They didn't actually take over Crytek until 2006 although they had a development deal back in 2004 apparently.

http://uk.gamespot.com/news/6156629.html

 

[Overdriven]

lol, take a trip to the opticians

Read what I posted aftwards, fucktard.

 

[MaCaBr3]

If you can't see the difference between a videogame and real life, then you need to go out more.

 

[Vladamir]

If you can't see the difference between a videogame and real life, then you need to go out more.

I thought they blurred into one

 

[Gamah]

If you can't see the difference between a videogame and real life, then you need to go out more.

Fucknut.