Thadius
Part of the furniture
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2004
- Messages
- 8,824
Profion said:Nha you have never killed me, the savage is on a closed acount that never seen the light in the RVR zoones. And yes it is a overpowered class u are using that kind of class you make when you cant play a normal char.....
Old.Ilum said:clustering is good for random roleplayers too
Redfern said:imo - vote NO
RvR will end up a grey zone where you play 2 realms in the same frontier. Where does your loyalty belong ??? Take "enemy" relics in the morning and take them back later - this will kill the game for sure. Clustering is ok where there are many servers, but we have only 2. I am pretty sure the vast majority will quit the game if it happends. Many players left US when they clustered there, even the fact they had like 14 servers clustered - again I say - we have only the two - let us keep them as they are.
Chronictank said:voted yes, people camping toa on all servers would suck
but good outweighs the bad, more gg's to fight, more people for mls etc
Ctuchik said:yeah, and imagine when pryd + excal albs wanna do a RR against pryd + excal hibs or mids or other way around or whatever.... if u think its lagging when just ONE server does it. just imagine what will happend when TWO servers does it.
Phuzzy said:ToA perfed RvRs artery & NF finished the job. Clustering may reinvigorate RvR for a month or three, but if you want DAoC RvR to have any kind of medium to long-term future you have to give new characters some kind of incentive to get out of the PvE zones & into the frontiers. Right now there's no point. Clustering won't fix that. DAoC=PvE MMORPG IMO.
Phuzzy said:TBH introducing clustering to heal RvR is like putting a plaster on a perforated artery.
bla bla bla~~
There's no DAoC=PvE MMORPG IMO.
Gamah said:You mean like a new daoc based expantion based on DF..so towers become impotant if you want to do the PVE...
xD