Tom
I am a FH squatter
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2003
- Messages
- 17,493
I was wondering.
Currently, insurance companies discriminate against policyholders based on their sex - generally speaking, women get cheaper insurance quotes than men.
This seems to be wholly accepted, and doesn't raise any real argument.
So what if a company used the same statistical calculations, but based upon race or religion rather than sex? Would this be a) socially acceptable, and b) a valid business proposal?
What if it could be demonstrated, statistically, that certain races/religions tended to cost the insurance company more or less money over the terms of policies?
Currently, insurance companies discriminate against policyholders based on their sex - generally speaking, women get cheaper insurance quotes than men.
This seems to be wholly accepted, and doesn't raise any real argument.
So what if a company used the same statistical calculations, but based upon race or religion rather than sex? Would this be a) socially acceptable, and b) a valid business proposal?
What if it could be demonstrated, statistically, that certain races/religions tended to cost the insurance company more or less money over the terms of policies?